A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP based multi criteria decision making approach for personnel selection

Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing

Volumn 20, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 571-593

  Kabak, Mehmet ^a  

^a TURKISH MILITARY ACADEMY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy ANP; Fuzzy DEMATEL; Fuzzy logic; Multi criteria decision making; Personnel Selection

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX PROBLEMS; DECISION MAKERS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; FUZZY ANP; FUZZY DEMATEL; INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCE; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA;

FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY SET THEORY; PERSONNEL SELECTION;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84877284532     PISSN: 15423980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Dursun M. and Karsak E.E. (2009). A Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Personnel Selection. Expert Systems With Applications 39(3), 3516-3525.
2. Canos L., Liern V. (2008). Soft Computing-Based Aggregation Methods for Human Resource Management. European Journal of Operational Research 189, 669-681. (Pubitemid 351400543)
3. Lin, H.T. (2010). Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 937-944.
4. Robertson, I.T., Smith, M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 441-472.
5. Chien, C.F., Chen, L.F. (2008). Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: A case study in high-technology industry. Expert Systemswith Applications, 34, 280-290.
6. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
7. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications 39(3), 3000-3011.
8. Güngör, Z., Serhadlioǧlu, G., and Kesen, S.E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection. Applied Soft Computing, 9, 641-646.
9. Kelemenis, A., Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4999-5008.
10. Chen, L.S., Cheng, C.H. (2005). Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method. European Journal of Operational Research, 160, 803-820.
11. Gibney, R., Shang, J. (2007). Decision-making in academia: A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 1030-1040. (Pubitemid 47302236)
12. Wang, D. (2009). Extension of TOPSIS method for R & D personnel selection problem with interval grey number. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE IEEM.
13. Ayub, M., Kabir, J., Alam, G.R. (2009). Personnel Selection method using analytic network process (ANP) and fuzzy concept. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE IEEM, 373-377.
14. Daǧdeviren, M. (2010). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personel selection in manufacturing systems. J Intell Manuf. 21, 451-460.
15. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
16. Chen, J.K., Chen, I.S., 2010. Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Systems with Applications 37(3), 1981-1990.
17. Yang, J.L., Tzeng, G.H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMA-TEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications 38(3), 1417-1424.
18. Wu, W.W., (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 828-835.
19. Tsai, W.H., Chou, W.C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 1444-1458.
20. Chen, F.H., Hsu, T.S., Tzeng, G.H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30(4), 908-932.
21. Hori, S., Shimizu, Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Engineering Practice, 7(11), 1413-1419.
22. Tamura, M., Nagata, H., Akazawa, K. (2002). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models. In 41st SICE annual conference, Osaka, Japan.
23. Lin, C. J., Wu, W. W., 2008. A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 205-213.
24. Chiu, Y. J., Chen, H. C., Tzeng, G. H., Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV. International Journal and Decision Making, 7(2/3), 143-165. (Pubitemid 43559413)
25. Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., Chang, H. C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a novel hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 243-249. (Pubitemid 46852351)
26. Hung, S.J., 2011. Activity-based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL-ANP fuzzy goal programming approach. Expert Systems with Applications 38(8), 9053-9062.
27. Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
28. Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, innovative methods. Report no. 2 structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 67-69.
29. Li, C.W., Tzeng, G.H. (2009). Identifcation of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to fnd critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 9891-9898.
30. Tsai, W.H., Chou, W.C., Hsu, W. (2008). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: An effective MCDM model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60, 1396-1410.
31. Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., Carrillo, P. M. (2002). A CLEVER approach to selecting a knowledge management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 205-211. (Pubitemid 34068101)
32. Wu, W. W., Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507.
33. Shieh, J.I., Wu, H.H., Huang, K.K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282
34. Mokhtarian, M.N. (2011). A note on "Developing global manager's competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method". Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 9050-9051.
35. Lin, Y.T., Yang, Y.H., Kang, J.S., Yu, H.C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262-6268.
36. Chang, B., Chang, C.W., Wu, C.H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858
37. Salehi, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2008). Project selection by using a fuzzy TOPSIS technique. Engineering and Technology, 30, 85-90.
38. Kabak, M., Burmaoǧlu, S., Kazançoǧlu, Y. (2012). A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3516-3525.
39. Tooli, F.H., Omidian, A., Fathi, M.R. (2011). Applying Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR to Research Supervisor Selection: A Case Study. American Journal of Scientifc Research, 30, 19-27.
40. Chen, S., Fan, J. (2011). Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility Based on a Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. I.J. Computer Network and Information Security, 5, 13-22.
41. Jassbi, J., Mohamadnejad, F., Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2011). A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 5967-5973.
42. Onut, S., Kara, S.S., Isik, E. (2009). Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3887-3895.
43. Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., Asgharpour, M. J. (2005). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91(8), 872-881.
44. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. (1998). Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Operations Research, 46(4), 491-502. (Pubitemid 128665759)
45. Yüksel, I., Daǧdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - A case study for a textile frm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382. (Pubitemid 46823979)
46. Ramik, J. (2006). A decision system using ANP and fuzzy inputs. In 12th international conference on the foundations and applications of utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Roma.
47. Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., Torlak, G., Turkyilmaz, A., Delen, D. (2012). Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 14-24.
48. Initial Entry Training Soldier's Handbook. (2008). TRADOC Pam 600-4. United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia, 23651-1047.