A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 4999-5008

  Kelemenis, Alecos ^a   Askounis, Dimitrios ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multi criteria decision making; Personnel selection; Veto threshold

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; DECISION CRITERIONS; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; FUZZY TECHNIQUES; FUZZY TOPSIS; HUMAN RESOURCES; IDEAL SOLUTIONS; KEY SUCCESS FACTORS; MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; NEW CONCEPT; OUTRANKING METHODS; REAL-LIFE APPLICATIONS; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS;

DECISION MAKING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL;

PERSONNEL SELECTION;

EID: 77950188198     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbasbandy S., and Asady B. Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Information Sciences 176 16 (2006) 2405-2416
2. Abdelaziz F.B. Multiple objective programming and goal programming: New trends and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 177 3 (2007) 1520-1522
3. Benítez J.M., Martín J.C., and Román C. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tourism Management 28 2 (2007) 544-555
4. Bharadwaj A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24 1 (2000) 169-196
5. Bharadwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1998). IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. In R. Hirschheim, M. Newman, J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international conference on information systems, Helsinki.
6. Bottani E., and Rizzi A. A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11 4 (2006) 294-308
7. Canós L., and Liern V. Soft computing-based aggregation methods for human resource management. European Journal of Operational Research 189 3 (2008) 669-681
8. Carr N.G. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review 5 (2003) 41-49
9. Chen C.T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 1 (2000) 1-9
10. Chen C.T., Lin C.T., and Huang S.F. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics 102 2 (2006) 289-301
11. Chen L.S., and Cheng C.H. Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method. European Journal of Operational Research 160 3 (2005) 803-820
12. Cheng C.H. A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 95 3 (1998) 307-317
13. Chien C.F., and Chen L.F. Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: A case study in high-technology industry. Expert Systems with Applications 34 1 (2008) 280-290
14. Chu T.C., and Tsao C.T. Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 43 1 (2002) 111-117
15. Dhillon G. Organizational competence for harnessing IT: A case study. Information and Management 45 5 (2008) 297-303
16. Earl M.J., and Feeny D.F. Is your CIO adding value. Sloan Management Review 35 3 (1994) 11-20
17. Enns H.G., Huff S.L., and Golden B.R. CIO influence behaviors: The impact of technical background. Information and Management 40 5 (2003) 467-485
18. Ertuǧrul I., and Karakaşoǧlu N. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 39 7/8 (2008) 783-795
19. Ertuǧrul I., and Karakaşoǧlu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 (2009) 702-715
20. Figueira J., Greco S., and Ehrgott M. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys series (2005), Springer, Boston, MA
21. Forman E.H., and Selly M.A. Decision by objectives: How to convince others that you are right (2001), World Scientific Publishing, New Jersey, NJ
22. Güngöra Z., Serhadlioǧlub G., and Kesen S.E. A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing 9 2 (2009) 641-646
23. Hsu T.K., Tsai Y.F., and Wu H.H. The preference analysis for tourist choice of destination: A case study of Taiwan. Tourism Management 30 2 (2009) 288-297
24. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications (1981), Springer, Berlin
25. Jacquet-Lagreze E., and Siskos J. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10 2 (1982) 151-164
26. Jereb E., Rajkovic U., and Rajkovic V. A hierarchical multi-attribute system approach to personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 13 3 (2005) 198-205
27. Kahraman C., Ates N.Y., Cevik S., Gulbay M., and Erdogan S.A. Hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS model for selection among logistics information technologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 20 2 (2007) 143-168
28. Kahraman C., Büyüközkan G., and Ateş N.Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences 177 7 (2007) 1567-1582
29. Kahraman C., Çevik S., Ates N.Y., and Gülbay M. Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering 52 4 (2007) 414-433
30. Kangas A., Kangas J., and Pykäläinen J. Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fennica 35 2 (2001) 215-227
31. Lederer A.L., and Mendelow A.L. Convincing top management of the strategic potential of information systems. MIS Quarterly 12 4 (1988) 525-534
32. Mata F.J., Fuerst W.L., and Barney J.B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19 4 (1995) 487-505
33. McKenney J.L., Mason R.O., and Copeland D.G. Bank of America: The crest and trough of technological leadership. MIS Quarterly 21 3 (1997) 321-353
34. Ölçer A.I., and Odabaşi A.Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to population/maneuvering system selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research 166 1 (2005) 93-114
35. Perçin S. Fuzzy multi-criteria risk-benefit analysis of business process outsourcing (BPO). Information Management and Computer Security 16 3 (2008) 213-234
36. Powell T.C., and Dent-Micallef A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 18 5 (1997) 375-405
37. Roy B. Aide multicritère à la décision, méthodes et cas (1993), Economica, Paris
38. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
39. Saaty T.L. Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation (1990), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA
40. Saremi M., Mousavi S.F., and Sanayei A. TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 36 2 (2009) 2742-2749
41. Seol I., and Sarkis J. A multi-attribute model for internal auditor selection. Managerial Auditing Journal 20 8 (2005) 876-892
42. Service R.W. CQ: The communication quotient for IS professionals. Journal of Information Science 31 2 (2005) 99-113
43. Shih H.S., Shyur H.J., and Lee E.S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45 7/8 (2007) 801-813
44. Shyjith K., Ilangkumaran M., and Kumanan S. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 14 4 (2008) 375-386
45. Siler W., and Buckley J.J. Fuzzy expert systems and fuzzy reasoning (2005), Wiley, New Jersey, NJ
46. Wade M., and Hulland J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly 28 1 (2004) 107-142
47. Wang J.W., Cheng C.H., and Huang K.C. Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing 9 1 (2009) 377-386
48. Wang Y.M., and Elhag T.M.S. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 31 2 (2006) 309-319
49. Ward J., and Peppard J. Reconciling the IT/business relationship: A troubled marriage in need of guidance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 5 1 (1996) 37-65
50. Ward S. Information professionals for the next millennium. Journal of Information Science 25 4 (1999) 239-247
51. Willcoxson L., and Chatham R. Testing the accuracy of the IT stereotype: Profiling IT managers' personality and behavioural characteristics. Information and Management 43 6 (2006) 697-705
52. Yager R.R. On a general class of fuzzy connectives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4 3 (1980) 235-242
53. Yao J.S., and Wu K. Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 116 22 (2000) 275-288
54. Zanakis S.H., Solomon A., Wishart N., and Dublish S. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research 107 3 (1998) 507-529