A personalized learning system based on semantic web technologies

Intelligent Tutoring Systems in E-Learning Environments: Design, Implementation and Evaluation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 258-284

  Daǧ, Funda ^a   Erkan, Kadir ^a  

^a KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877151678     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-008-1.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Aase, M., & Kurfess, F. J. (2004, August). Utilizing Learning Styles for Interactive Tutorials. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), Joensuu, Finland, (2004).
2. ADL. (2002). Advanced Distributed Learning Sharable Content Object Reference Model Version 1.3, Application Profile Working Draft 0.9, Advanced Distributed Learning Network, Retrieved May 06, 2009, from http://xml.coverpages.org/SCORMV13-SeqAppProfile.pdf
3. Antoniou, G., & Van Harmelen, F. (2008). A semantic web primer (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Aroya, L., & Dicheva, D. (2004). The new challenges for e-learning: the educational semantic web. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 59-69.
5. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D. L., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. F. (Eds.). (2003). The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Pressrx.
6. Barrit, C., Lewis, D., & Wieseler, W. (1999). CISCO Systems Reusable Information Object Strategy Version 3.0. Cisco Systems. Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/ibs/solutions/learning/whitepapers/el_cisco_rio.pdf
7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 184(5), 34-43. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
8. Bick, M., Adelsberger, H., & Pawlowski, J. (2000). The Essen Learning Model A Step Towards a Standard Model of Learning Processes. In J. Bourdeau & R. Heller (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2000 (pp. 118-123). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
9. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Developing adaptive educational hypermedia systems: From design models to authoring tools. In: T. Murray, S. Blessing and S. Ainsworth (Ed.), Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environment (377-409). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishersrx.
10. Brusilovsky, P., & Vassileva, J. (2003). Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1-2), 75-94.
11. Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A., & Lavelle, E. (1996). Enhancing student learning by incorporating student learning styles into adaptive hypermedia. In Proceedings of EDMEDIA 96 - World Conference on EducationalMultimedia and Hypermedia (118-123). Boston.
12. Choe, H. (2006). Ontology based e-learning Authoring System. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 5(12), 1319-1322.
13. Chrysostomou, C. P., & Papadopoulos, G. A. (2005, May). An Evaluation of E-Learning Technologies and Trends: Establishing and Object-Oriented Approach to Learning Object Design and Development. Paper presented at the First International Conference on E-Business and E-learning (EBEL'05),88-96. Amman, Jordan. Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://www.psut.edu.jo/EBEL/pdf/16.pdf
14. Cisco Systems Inc. (2003). Reusable Learning Object Authoring Guidelines: How to Build Modules, Lessons, Topics Version 4.5. Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://db.formez.it/fontinor.nsf/c658e3224c300556c1256ae90036d38e/DF95A2799A3D7085C1256E59003B33F5/$file/Cisco%20Reusable%20LO%20Authoring%20Guidelines%2007-2003.pdf
15. Dicheva, D., Sosnovsky, S., Gavrilova, T., & Brusilovsky, P. (2005, July). Ontological web portal for educational ontologies. Paper presented at International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SWEL) AIED'05. Amsterdam.
16. Dodds, P. (2001). Advanced Distributed Learning Sharable Content Object Reference Model Version 1.2, The SCORM Content Aggregation Model, Retrieved May 06, 2009, from http://coco.ccu.uniovi.es/e-learning/scorm/overview/organiza/ContentAM.pdf
17. Duncan, C. (2003). Granularization. In Littlejohn, A. (Ed.), Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to eLearning (pp. 12-19). London: Kogan Page.
18. Duval, E., & Hodgins, W. (2007). Learning objects revisited. In McGreal, R. (Ed.), Online Education Using Learning Objects (pp. 71-82). London: Routledge/Falmer.
19. Dvedžić, V. B. (2004). Web intelligence and artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 29-39.
20. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. English Education, 78(7), 674-681.
21. Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., & Eriksson, H. (2003). The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development. Int. J. Hum.- [IJMMS]. Comput. Stud., 58(1), 89-123.
22. Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220. Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://ksl-web.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/README.html#ontolingua-intro
23. Hamel, C. J., & Ryan-Jones, D. (2002). Designing Instruction with Learning Objects. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1).
24. Hatzilygeroudis, I., Prentzas, J., & Garofalakis, J. (2005, July). Personalized learning in web-based intelligent educational systems: technologies and techniques. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII-2005), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
25. Hendler, J. (2001). Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2), 30-37. doi:10.1109/5254.920597
26. Hong H. & Kinshuk, (2004). Adaptation to student learning styles in web based educational systems. In L.Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Ed.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 491-496). Lugano, Switzerland: AACE.
27. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P. F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., & Dean, M. (2004). SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
28. IEEE LTSC. (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE 1484.12.1-2002. IEEE LTSC Working Group, Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
29. Karampiperis, P., & Sampson, D. (2004, August). Adaptive instructional planning using ontologies. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'2004), Joensuu, Finland.
30. Koesling, A. W., Krause, D., & Herder, E. (2008). Flexible Adaptivity in AEHS Using Policies. In Nejdl, W. (Eds.), AH 2008, LNCS 5149 (pp. 410-415). Heidelberg: Springer.
31. Kontopoulos, E., Vrakas, D., Kokkoras, F., Bassiliades, N., & Vlahavas, I. (2008). An ontology-based planning system for e-course generation. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1-2), 398-406. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.034
32. Madhour, H., Forte, M. W. (2006). Semantic Learning Model and eXtended Student Model: Towards an AHAM-based adaptive system. Paper presented at WBE 2006, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
33. Merrill, M. (1998). Knowledge analysis for effective instruction. CBT Solutions (pp.1-11). Retrieved May 09, 2009 from http://id2.usu.edu/Papers/KnowledgeObjects.PDF
34. Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeu, J. (2000). Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(2), 107-121.
35. Mohan, P., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (2003, August). Instructional planning with learning objects. Paper presented at the 18th International Joint Conference on AI Workshop on Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for ELearning System (KRR-5), Acapulco, Mexico.
36. O'Connor, M., Knublauch, H., & Tui, S. (2005). Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL. In Proceedings. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2005) (pp.974-986). Held Galway, Irelandrx.
37. Oguejiofor, E., Kicinger, R., Popovici, E., Arciszewski, T., & De Jong, K. (2004). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: an ontology-based approach. International Journal of IT in Architecture. Engineering and Construction, 2(2), 115-128.
38. Onaindía, E., & Sapena, O., Garrido, A. (2007, October). An AI planning-based approach for automated design of learning routes. Paper presented at the ECEL 2007, 6th European Conference on e-Learning, Copenhagen, Denmark.
39. Pahl, C., & Holohan, E. (2004). Ontology Technology for the Development and Deployment of Learning Technology Systems - a Survey. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 2077-2084). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
40. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. D. (2002). INSPIRE: An INtelligent System for Personalized Instruction in a Remote Environment. In Revised Papers From the Nternational Workshops Ohs-7, Sc-3, and Ah-3 on Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness, and Adaptivity (August 14 - 18, 2001).
41. S. Reich, M. Tzagarakis, and P. D. Bra (Ed), Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 2266, 215-225.
42. Paramythis, A., & Loidl-Reisinger, S. (2004). Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 2(2). Retrieved May 09, 2009 from http://www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue1/issue1-art11.htm
43. Sampson, D., & Karagiannidis, C. (2002). From Content Objects to Learning Objects: Adding Instructional Information to Educational Metadata. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 02) (pp. 513-518).
44. SQWRL (Semantic Query-Enhanced Web Rule Language). Protege Wiki Home Page. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SQWRL
45. Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A. (2006). Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: A Review of Adaptivity Variables. In Proceedings of the Fifth Panhellenic Conference-Information and Communication Technologies in Education (pp.75-82). Thessaloniki, Greece.
46. Ullrich, C. (2005). Course generation based on HTN planning. In A. Jedlitschka & B. Brandherm (Ed.), Proceedings of 13th Annual Workshop of the SIG Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems, (pp.74-79).
47. Vassileva, J., & Wasson, B. (1996, September). Instructional planning approaches: from tutoring towards free learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Euro-AIED'96, Lisbon.
48. Verbert, K., Klerkx, J., Meire, M., Najjar, J., & Duval, E. (2004). Towards global component architecture for learning objects: An ontology based approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3292, 713-722.
49. Wenying, G., & Deren, C. (2006). Semantic Approach for e-learning System. In Proceedings of First International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences (IMSCCS 2006), (vol.2, pp.442-446). Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
50. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Learning object design and sequencing theory. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Brigham Young University.
51. Wu, H., Kort, E., De Bra, P. (2001). Design Issue for General Purpose Adaptive Hypermedia Systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp.141-150), Aarhus, Denmark.