Agents and the Semantic Web

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 30-37

  Hendler, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER VISION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 0035267850     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/5254.920597     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. T. Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web,Orion Business Books, London, 1999.
2. O. Lassila and R. Swick, Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, W3C Recommendation,World Wide Web Consortium, Boston, 1999, www. w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax (current 6 Dec. 2000).
3. D. Brickley and R.V. Guha, Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, Boston, 2000, www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema (current 6 Dec. 2000).
4. J. Broekstra et al., “Enabling Knowledge Representation on the Web by Extending RDF Schema,” Proc. 10th Int'l World Wide Web Conf., Hong Kong, 2001.
5. T.R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, 1993, pp. 199-220.
6. D.B. Lenat and R.V. Guha, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.
7. M.R. Genesereth, “Knowledge Interchange Format,” Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 91), J. Allenet et al., eds., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1991, pp. 238-249; http://logic.Stanford.edu/kif/kif.html (current 9 Mar. 2001).
8. A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, and J. Rice, “The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction,” Int'l. J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 46, 1997, pp. 707-728.
9. D. Fensel et al., “OIL in a Nutshell,” Proc. European Knowledge Acquisition Conference (EKAW 2000), R. Dieng et al., eds., Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, no. 1937, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000, pp. 1-16.
10. I. Horrocks et al., The Ontology Inference Layer OIL, tech. report, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/ TR/oil.long.html (current 9 Mar. 2001).
11. W.E. Grosso et al., “Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protege-2000),” Proc. 12th Workshop Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management, 1999.
12. M. Klein et al., “The Relation between Ontologies and Schema-Languages: Translating OIL Specifications to XML Schema,” Proc. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, 14th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, 2000.
13. M. Erdmann and R. Studer, “How to Structure and Access XML Documents with Ontologies,” Data and Knowledge Eng., vol. 36, no. 3, 2001.
14. I. Horrocks and P.F. Patel-Schneider, “Optimizing Description Logic Subsumption,” J. Logic and Computation, vol. 9, no. 3, June 1999, pp. 267-293.
15. A.L. Rector, W.A. Nowlan, and A. Glowinski, “Goals for Concept Representation in the GALEN Project,” Proc. 17th Ann. Symp. Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC 93), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993, pp. 414-418.
16. D. Fensel et al., “On-To-Knowledge: Ontology-based Tools for Knowledge Management,” Proc. eBusiness and eWork 2000 Conf. (EMMSEC 2000), 2000.
17. S. Luke, L. Spector, and D. Rager, “Ontology-Based Knowledge Discovery on the World Wide Web,” Proc. 13th Nat'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 96), American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, Calif., 1996.
18. D. Fensel et al., “Lessons Learned from Applying AI to the Web,” J. Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, Dec. 2000, pp. 361-382.
19. U. Reimer et al., eds., Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM 98), 1998.
20. F. Ygge and J.M. Akkermans, “Decentralized Markets versus Central Control: A Comparative Study,” J. Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 11, July-Dec. 1999, pp. 301-333.