Principal component and clustering analysis on molecular dynamics data of the ribosomal L11·23S subdomain

Journal of Molecular Modeling

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 539-549

  Wolf, Antje ^a,b   Kirschner, Karl N ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR ALGORITHMS AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING SCAI   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clustering; Molecular dynamics; Principal component analysis; Ribosome

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOMAL L11 23S; RNA 23S; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RNA STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; RIBOSOMES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 23S; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THIOSTREPTON;

EID: 84877120834     PISSN: 16102940     EISSN: 09485023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-012-1563-4     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Mohr D, Wintermeyer W, Rodnina MV (2002) GTPase activation of elongation factors Tu and G on the ribosome. Biochemistry 41:12520-12528
2. Diaconu M, Kothe U, Schlünzen F, Fischer N, Harms JM et al (2005) Structural basis for the function of the ribosomal L7/12 stalk in factor binding and GTPase activation. Cell 121:991-1004
3. Gao YG, Selmer M, Dunham CM, Weixlbaumer A, Kelley AC et al (2009) The structure of the ribosome with elongation factor G trapped in the posttranslocational state. Science 326:694-699
4. Rosendahl G, Douthwaite S (1994) The antibiotics micrococcin and thiostrepton interact directly with 23S rRNA nucleotides 1067A and 1095A. Nucleic Acids Res 22:357-363
5. Porse BT, Leviev I, Mankin AS, Garrett RA (1998) The antibiotic thiostrepton inhibits a functional transition within protein L11 at the ribosomal GTPase centre. J Mol Biol 276:391-404
6. Bowen WS, Dyke NV, Murgola EJ, Lodmell JS, Hill WE (2005) Interaction of thiostrepton and elongation factor-G with the ribosomal protein L11-binding domain. J Biol Chem 280:2934-2943
7. Baumann S, Schoof S, Harkal SD, Arndt HD (2008) Mapping the binding site of thiopeptide antibiotics by proximity-induced covalent capture. J Am Chem Soc 130:5664-5666
8. Schoof S, Baumann S, Ellinger B, Arndt HD (2009) A fluorescent probe for the 70 S-ribosomal GTPase-associated center. Chembiochem 10:242-245
9. Walter JD, Hunter M, Cobb M, Traeger G, Spiegel PC (2012) Thiostrepton inhibits stable 70S ribosome binding and ribosome-dependent GTPase activation of elongation factor G and elongation factor 4. Nucleic Acids Res 40:360-370
10. Hermann (2000) Strategies for the design of drugs targeting RNA and RNA-protein complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 39:1890-1904
11. Hermann T (2005) Drugs targeting the ribosome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:355-366
12. Wimberly BT, Guymon R, McCutcheon JP, White SW, Ramakrishnan V (1999) A detailed view of a ribosomal active site: the structure of the L11-RNA complex. Cell 97:491-502
13. Jonker HRA, Ilin S, Grimm SK, Wöhnert J, Schwalbe H (2007) L11 domain rearrangement upon binding to RNA and thiostrepton studied by NMR spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 35:441-454
14. Lee D, Walsh JD, Yu P, Markus MA, Choli-Papadopoulou T et al (2007) The structure of free L11 and functional dynamics of L11 in free, L11-rRNA(58 nt) binary and L11-rRNA(58 nt)-thiostrepton ternary complexes. J Mol Biol 367:1007-1022
15. Li W, Sengupta J, Rath BK, Frank J (2006) Functional conformations of the L11-ribosomal RNA complex revealed by correlative analysis of cryo-EM and molecular dynamics simulations. RNA 12:1240-1253
16. Wolf A, Baumann S, Arndt HD, Kirschner KN (2012) Influence of thiostrepton binding on the ribosomal GTPase associated region characterized by molecular dynamics simulation. (in review)
17. Harms JM, Wilson DN, Schlünzen F, Connell SR, Stachelhaus T et al (2008) Translational regulation via L11: molecular switches on the ribosome turned on and off by thiostrepton and micrococcin. Mol Cell 30:26-38
18. Baumann S, Schoof S, Bolten M, Haering C, Takagi M et al (2010) Molecular determinants of microbial resistance to thiopeptide antibiotics. J Am Chem Soc 132:6973-6981
19. Huisinga W, Best C, Roitzsch R, Schütte C, Cordes F (1999) From simulation data to conformational ensembles: structure and dynamics-based methods. J Comput Chem 20:1760-1774
20. Deuflhard P, Huisinga W, Fischer A, Schütte C (2000) Identification of almost invariant aggregates in reversible nearly uncoupled Markov chains. Linear Algebr Appl 315:39-59
21. Chodera JD, Singhal N, Pande VS, Dill KA, Swope WC (2007) Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. J Chem Phys 126:155101
22. Noé F, Horenko I, Schütte C, Smith JC (2007) Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states. J Chem Phys 126:155102
23. Muff S, Caflisch A (2008) Kinetic analysis of molecular dynamics simulations reveals changes in the denatured state and switch of folding pathways upon single-point mutation of a beta-sheet miniprotein. Proteins 70:1185-1195
24. Keller B, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF (2010) Comparing geometric and kinetic cluster algorithms for molecular simulation data. J Chem Phys 132:074110
25. Zhuravlev PI, Materese CK, Papoian GA (2009) Deconstructing the native state: energy landscapes, function, and dynamics of globular proteins. J Phys Chem B 113:8800-8812
26. Kohonen T (2001) Self-Organizing Maps, volume 30 of Springer series in information sciences. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 3rd edition
27. Savol AJ, Burger VM, Agarwal PK, Ramanathan A, Chennubhotla CS (2011) QAARM: quasi-anharmonic autoregressive model reveals molecular recognition pathways in ubiquitin. Bioinformatics 27:i52-i60
28. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York
29. de Groot BL, Daura X, Mark AE, Grubmüller H (2001) Essential dynamics of reversible peptide folding: memory-free conformational dynamics governed by internal hydrogen bonds. J Mol Biol 309:299-313
30. Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
31. Zha H, He X, Ding CHQ, Gu M, Simon HD (2001) Spectral Relaxation for K-means Clustering. In: NIPS'01. pp. 1057-1064
32. Grant BJ, McCammon JA, Caves LS, Cross RA (2007) Multivariate analysis of conserved sequence-structure relationships in kinesins: Coupling of the active site and a tubulin-binding sub-domain. J Mol Biol 368:1231-1248
33. Yeung KY, Ruzzo WL (2001) Principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data. Bioinformatics 17:763-774
34. Altis A, Otten M, Nguyen PH, Hegger R, Stock G (2008) Construction of the free energy landscape of biomolecules via dihedral angle principal component analysis. J Chem Phys 128:245102
35. Frickenhaus S, Kannan S, Zacharias M (2009) Efficient evaluation of sampling quality of molecular dynamics simulations by clustering of dihedral torsion angles and Sammon mapping. J Comput Chem 30:479-492
36. Matthes D, Gapsys V, Daebel V, de Groot BL (2011) Mapping the conformational dynamics and pathways of spontaneous steric zipper peptide oligomerization. PLoS One 6:e19129
37. Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28:100-108
38. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York
39. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-935
40. Pérez A, Marchán I, Svozil D, Sponer J, Cheatham TE et al (2007) Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. Biophys J 92:3817-3829
41. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A et al (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65:712-725
42. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H et al (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 103:8577-8593
43. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327-341
44. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R et al (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668-1688
45. Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 2:559-572
46. Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24: 417-441 and 498-520
47. van Aalten DM, Conn DA, de Groot BL, Berendsen HJ, Findlay JB et al (1997) Protein dynamics derived from clusters of crystal structures. Biophys J 73:2891-2896
48. Elsawy KM, Hodgson MK, Caves LSD (2005) The physical determinants of the DNA conformational landscape: an analysis of the potential energy surface of single-strand dinucleotides in the conformational space of duplex DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 33:5749-5762
49. Amadei A, Linssen AB, Berendsen HJ (1993) Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 17:412-425
50. van Aalten DM, Findlay JB, Amadei A, Berendsen HJ (1995) Essential dynamics of the cellular retinol-binding protein-evidence for ligand-induced conformational changes. Protein Eng 8:1129-1135
51. Lange OF, Grubmüller H (2006) Can principal components yield a dimension reduced description of protein dynamics on long time scales? J Phys Chem B 110:22842-22852
52. Papaleo E, Mereghetti P, Fantucci P, Grandori R, Gioia LD (2009) Free-energy landscape, principal component analysis, and structural clustering to identify representative conformations from molecular dynamics simulations: the myoglobin case. J Mol Graph Model 27:889-899
53. Maass A, Tekin ED, Schüller A, Palazoglu A, Reith D et al (2010) Folding and unfolding characteristics of short beta strand peptides under different environmental conditions and starting configurations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804:2003-2015
54. Hayward S, de Groot BL (2008) Normal modes and essential dynamics. Methods Mol Biol 443:89-106
55. Mu Y, Nguyen PH, Stock G (2005) Energy landscape of a small peptide revealed by dihedral angle principal component analysis. Proteins 58:45-52
56. Altis A, Nguyen PH, Hegger R, Stock G (2007) Dihedral angle principal component analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 126:244111
57. Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2006) Introduction to Data Mining, Addison-Wesley, chapter Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts and Algorithms. pp. 487-568
58. Shao J, Tanner SW, Thompson N, Cheatham TE (2007) Clustering molecular dynamics trajectories: 1. Characterizing the performance of different clustering algorithms. J Chem Theory Comput 3:2312-2334
59. Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv 31:264-323
60. Murtagh F (1985) Multidimensional clustering algorithms, volume 4 of Compstat Lectures. Physica, Vienna
61. Milligan G, Cooper M (1985) An examination of procedures of determining the number of cluster in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159-179
62. Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2001) On clustering validation techniques. J Intell Inf Syst 17:107-145
63. Caliński T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 3:1-27
64. Grant BJ, Rodrigues APC, ElSawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LSD (2006) Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 22:2695-2696
65. Hess B (2000) Similarities between principal components of protein dynamics and random diffusion. Phys Rev E 62:8438-8448
66. Hess B (2002) Convergence of sampling in protein simulations. Phys Rev E 65:031910
67. Shenkin PS, McDonald DQ (1994) Cluster analysis of molecular conformations. J Comput Chem 15:899-916
68. Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245-276
69. DeLano WL (2006) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific LLC