Do trainees value feedback in case-based discussion assessments?

Medical Teacher

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Mehta, Fulya ^a   Brown, Jeremy ^b   Shaw, N J ^a,c  

^a LIVERPOOL WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b EDGE HILL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Mersey Deanery ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PEDIATRICS; UNITED KINGDOM; PROCEDURES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LEARNING; PEDIATRICS;

EID: 84877059133     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.731100     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Carr S. 2006. The Foundation Programme assessment tools: An opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgrad Med J 82:576-579
2. Department of Health. 1991. Hours of work of doctors in training: The new deal. London: Department of Health
3. Department of Health. 2003. Modernising medical careers: The response of the four UK Health Ministers to the consultation on ''Unfinished Business -proposals for the reform of the senior house officer grade''. London: Department of Health
4. Department of Health. 2004. Modernising medical careers: The next steps. The future shape of foundation, specialist and general practice training programmes. London: Department of Health
5. Department of Health. 2008. The secretary of state for health's response to aspiring to excellence: Final report of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. London: Department of Health
6. Hauer KE. 2000. Enhancing feedback to students using the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise). Acad Med 75:524
7. Hewson MG, Little ML. 1998. Giving feedback in medical education, verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 13:111-116
8. Holemboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ. 2004. Feedback and the Mini Clinical Evaluation Excercise. J Gen Intern Med 19:558-561
9. Johnson G, Barrett J, Jones M, Parry D, Wade W. 2008. Feedback from educational supervisors and trainees on the implementation of curricula and the assessment system for core medical training (CMT) programme. Clin Med 8:484-489
10. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shae JA. 2002. Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students clinical skills. Acad Med 77:1156-1157
11. Modernising Medical Careers. 2010. [Accessed September 2010] Available from http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/assessment
12. Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29:855-871
13. Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. 2003. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications
14. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 2010. Assessment tools guidance. [Accessed September 2010] Available from www.rcpch.ac. uk/Training/Assessment/Assessment-Tools-guidance/ePaedCbD
15. Sargent J, Mann K, Ferrier S. 2005. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 39:497-504
16. Scallen S. 2003. Education and the working patterns of junior doctors in the UK: A review of the literature. Med Educ 37:907-912
17. Sender-Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. 2005. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach 27(5):470-472
18. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, William CM, Cate OTJ. 2008. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 42:189-197
19. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. 2003. Multisource feedback: A method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ 326:546-548