Feasibility of aortic valve assessment with low dose prospectively triggered adaptive systolic (PTAS) cardiac computed tomography angiography

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Lee, Ashley M ^a   Beaudoin, Jonathan ^a   Thai, Wai Ee ^a   Wai, Bryan ^a   Hui, Gladwin C ^a   Sidhu, Manavjot S ^a   Engel, Leif Christopher ^a   Abbara, Suhny ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^a   Ghoshhajra, Brian B ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Computed tomography angiography; Low dose

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA VALVE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTOLE; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTIC VALVE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SYSTOLE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84877002459     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-158     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, Bettex D, Baumert B, Leschka S, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, Boehm T, Radiology 2006 240 47 55 10.1148/radiol.2393050458 16709791
2. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, Schachner T, Velik-Salchner C, Pachinger O, Dichtl W, Am J Roentgenol 2007 189 197 203 10.2214/AJR.07.2069
3. Computed tomography assessment of valvular morphology, function, and disease. Chen JJ-S, Jeudy J, Thorn EM, White CS, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009 3 47 S56 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.017 19153063
4. CT angiography of the cardiac valves: normal, diseased, and postoperative appearances. Chen JJ, Manning MA, Frazier AA, Jeudy J, White CS, RadioGraphics 2009 29 1393 1412 10.1148/rg.295095002 19755602
5. The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiography. Tanaka H, Shimada K, Yoshida K, Jissho S, Yoshikawa J, Yoshiyama M, Circ J 2007 71 1593 1598 10.1253/circj.71.1593 17895557
6. Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. Bouvier E, Logeart D, Sablayrolles JL, Feignoux J, Scheuble C, Touche T, Thabut G, Cohen-Solal A, Eur Heart J 2006 27 3033 3038 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl273 17015404
7. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ, Frick M, Alber H, Schachner T, Bonatti J, Mallouhi A, Frede T, Pachinger O, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 1410 1417 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.056 16580530
8. Quantification of aortic valve area with ECG-gated multi-detector spiral computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis and comparison of two image analysis methods. Leborgne L, Choplin Y, Renard C, Claeys M, Levy F, Jarry G, Rey JL, Remond A, Quiret JC, Tribouilloy C, Int J Cardiol 2009 135 266 269 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.095 18619692
9. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty J-M, Laissy J-P, Berhili M, Brochet E, Iung B, Vahanian A, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48 411 413 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.035 16843196
10. Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ, Whiteman MS, Asher CR, Kirsch J, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 25 601 609 10.1007/s10554-009-9464-z 19421893
11. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis by cardiac multislice computed tomography compared with echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdulla J, Sivertsen J, Kofoed KF, Alkadhi H, LaBounty T, Abildstrom SZ, Kober L, Christensen E, Torp-Pedersen C, J Heart Valve Dis 2009 18 634 643 20099712
12. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, Gentry R, Mahesh M, Raff GL, Shaw LJ, Hausleiter J, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011 5 198 224 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001 21723512
13. Evolution of coronary computed tomography radiation dose reduction at a tertiary referral center. Ghoshhajra BB, Engel LC, Major GP, Goehler A, Techasith T, Verdini D, Do S, Liu B, Li X, Sala M, Am J Med 2012 125 764 772 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.036 22703931
14. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E, Spagnolo P, Yamamoto H, Carrascosa P, Anger T, Lehmkuhl L, Alkadhi H, Martinoff S, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 5 484 493 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.017 22595156
15. Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 27 1081 1087 10.1007/s10554-010-9756-3 21120612
16. Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: Radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT. Lee AM, Engel LC, Shah B, Liew G, Sidhu MS, Kalra M, Abbara S, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012 6 172 183 e172 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.003 22542280
17. Assessment of image quality and radiation dose of prospectively ECG-triggered adaptive dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) with arrhythmia rejection algorithm in systole versus diastole: a retrospective cohort study. Lee AM, Beaudoin J, Engel LC, Sidhu MS, Abbara S, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013 24 24
18. Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Baumueller S, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Wieser M, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Eur Radiol 2010 20 2092 2099 10.1007/s00330-010-1794-7 20407896
19. Evaluation of cardiac function and valves by multidetector row computed tomography. Abbara S, Soni AV, Cury RC, Semin Roentgenol 2008 43 145 153 10.1053/j.ro.2008.01.009 18329525
20. Automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol. Park YJ, Kim YJ, Lee JW, Kim HY, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Hur J, Nam JE, Choi BW, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012 6 184 190 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.002 22551594
21. Cardiac computed tomography angiography with automatic tube potential selection: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Ghoshhajra BB, Engel LC, Karolyi M, Sidhu MS, Wai B, Barreto M, Shanmugam U, Hoffmann U, Brady TJ, Kalra M, Abbara S, J Thorac Imaging 2012 28 1 40 48
22. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, Gulati A, Roussin I, Alpendurada F, Park B, Okoroafor F, Asgar A, Barker S, J Am Coll Cardiol 2011 58 2165 2173 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.010 22078422
23. The effect of heart rhythm on patient radiation dose with dual-source cardiac computed tomography. Techasith T, Ghoshhajra BB, Truong QA, Pale R, Nasir K, Bolen MA, Hoffmann U, Cury RC, Abbara S, Brady TJ, Blankstein R, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011 5 255 263 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.05.003 21723517