Evaluation of Cardiac Function and Valves by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 145-153

  Abbara, Suhny ^a   Soni, Anand V ^a   Cury, Ricardo C ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART FUNCTION; HEART PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 40449133485     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2008.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Fine J.J., Hopkins C.B., Ruff N., and Newton F.C. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 173-174
2. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 1482-1487
3. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
4. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1919-1928
5. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
6. Leber A.W., Knez A., von Ziegler F., et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 147-154
7. Ropers D., Rixe J., Anders K., et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 343-348
8. Juergens K.U., Grude M., Fallenberg E.M., et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 1545-1550
9. Lessick J., Mutlak D., Rispler S., et al. Comparison of multidetector computed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 1011-1015
10. Ferencik M., Gregory S.A., Butler J., et al. Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Lung Transplant 26 (2007) 478-484
11. Raman S.V., Shah M., McCarthy B., et al. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151 (2006) 736-744
12. Schlosser T., Pagonidis K., Herborn C.U., et al. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 765-773
13. Heuschmid M., Rothfuss J.K., Schroeder S., et al. Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 551-559
14. Hoffmann U., Millea R., Enzweiler C., et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 231 (2004) 697-701
15. Nieman K., Cury R.C., Ferencik M., et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 303-308
16. Mahnken A.H., Bruners P., Katoh M., et al. Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 746-752
17. Mahnken A.H., Koos R., Katoh M., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 2042-2047
18. Lardo A.C., Cordeiro M.A., Silva C., et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113 (2006) 394-404
19. Paul J.F., Wartski M., Caussin C., et al. Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 236 (2005) 485-489
20. Gerber B.L., Belge B., Legros G.J., et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 113 (2006) 823-833
21. Buecker A., Katoh M., Krombach G.A., et al. A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs. Invest Radiol 40 (2005) 700-704
22. Juergens K.U., and Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 342-357
23. Reimann A.J., Rinck D., Birinci-Aydogan A., et al. Dual-source computed tomography: advances of improved temporal resolution in coronary plaque imaging. Invest Radiol 42 (2007) 196-203
24. Johnson T.R., Nikolaou K., Wintersperger B.J., et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1409-1415
25. Flohr T.G., McCollough C.H., Bruder H., et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 256-268
26. Salm L.P., Schuijf J.D., de Roos A., et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr 7 (2006) 308-314
27. Abbara S., Chow B.J., Pena A.J., et al. Assessment of left ventricular function with 16- and 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol (2007) Sep 7:[Epub ahead of print]
28. Juergens K.U., Maintz D., Grude M., et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography of the heart: does a multi-segment reconstruction algorithm improve left ventricular volume measurements?. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 111-117
29. Delhaye D., Remy-Jardin M., Teisseire A., et al. MDCT of right ventricular function: comparison of right ventricular ejection fraction estimation and equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography, part 1. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 1597-1604
30. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002) 539-542
31. Savino G., Zwerner P., Herzog C., et al. CT of cardiac function. J Thorac Imaging 22 (2007) 86-100
32. Mahnken A.H., Muhlenbruch G., Gunther R.W., et al. Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 994-1008
33. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Kanu C., et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists
34. Vogel-Claussen J., Pannu H., Spevak P.J., et al. Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 26 (2006) 1769-1784
35. Rozenshtein A., and Boxt L.M. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients with valvular heart disease. J Thorac Imaging 15 (2000) 252-264
36. Gilkeson R.C., Markowitz A.H., Balgude A., et al. MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 350-360
37. Boxt L.M., Lipton M.J., Kwong R.Y., et al. Computed tomography for assessment of cardiac chambers, valves, myocardium and pericardium. Cardiol Clin 21 (2003) 561-585
38. Koos R., Kuhl H.P., Muhlenbruch G., et al. Prevalence and clinical importance of aortic valve calcification detected incidentally on CT scans: comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 241 (2006) 76-82
39. Mahnken A.H., Koos R., Wildberger J.E., et al. [Value of cardiac multislice spiral CT for the assessment of degenerative aortic stenosis: comparison with echocardiography]. Rofo 176 (2004) 1582-1588
40. Willmann J.K., Weishaupt D., Lachat M., et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 225 (2002) 120-128
41. Koos R., Mahnken A.H., Sinha A.M., et al. Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 1813-1818
42. Morgan-Hughes G.J., Owens P.E., Roobottom C.A., et al. Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography. Heart 89 (2003) 1191-1194
43. Cowell S.J., Newby D.E., Burton J., et al. Aortic valve calcification on computed tomography predicts the severity of aortic stenosis. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 712-716
44. Wagner S., and Selzer A. Patterns of progression of aortic stenosis: a longitudinal hemodynamic study. Circulation 65 (1982) 709-712
45. Stewart B.F., Siscovick D., Lind B.K., et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29 (1997) 630-634
46. Abbara S., Pena A.J., Maurovich-Horvat P., et al. Feasibility and optimization of aortic valve planimetry with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 356-360
47. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Friedrich G.J., et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 1410-1417
48. Carabello B.A. Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 677-682
49. Grossman W., Jones D., and McLaurin L.P. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 56 (1975) 56-64
50. Bouvier E., Logeart D., Sablayrolles J.L., et al. Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 3033-3038
51. Alkadhi H., Wildermuth S., Plass A., et al. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240 (2006) 47-55
52. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Schachner T., et al. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1676-1681
53. Messika-Zeitoun D., Serfaty J.M., Laissy J.P., et al. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 411-413
54. Carabello B.A. Mitral valve regurgitation. Curr Probl Cardiol 23 (1998) 202-241
55. Alkadhi H., Bettex D., Wildermuth S., et al. Dynamic cine imaging of the mitral valve with 16-MDCT: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 636-646
56. Lembcke A., Wiese T.H., Enzweiler C.N., et al. Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation by left ventricular volume and flow measurements using electron beam computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27 (2003) 385-391
57. Lembcke A., Borges A.C., Dohmen P.M., et al. Quantification of functional mitral valve regurgitation in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison of electron-beam computed tomography with cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 39 (2004) 728-739
58. Alkadhi H., Wildermuth S., Bettex D.A., et al. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT-initial experience. Radiology 238 (2006) 454-463