Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion for treating thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: Average 15-year follow-up analysis

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 819-826

  Sudo, Hideki ^a   Ito, Manabu ^a   Kaneda, Kiyoshi ^b   Shono, Yasuhiro ^c   Takahata, Masahiko ^a   Abumi, Kuniyoshi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Hokushin Memorial Hospital   (Japan)

^c Hokkaido Social Insurance Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; anterior spinal fusion; forced expiratory volume in 1 second; forced vital capacity; long term follow upanalysis; main thoracic curve; patient outcome measures; pulmonary function; surgical correction; thoracic kyphosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ADULT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; BRONCHITIS; BRONCHUS DISEASE; BRONCHUS STENOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COBB ANGLE; COUGHING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; FORCED VITAL CAPACITY; HEMOPTYSIS; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LUNG FUNCTION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; MALE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876956911     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ddc60     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2004; 29cny KOR 2040-8.
2. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2006; 31cny KOR 2400-4.
3. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. Anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis with Kaneda anterior spinal system. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 1997; 22cny KOR 1358-68.
4. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements III DH, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 1999; 24cny KOR 225-39.
5. Brodner W, Mun Yue W, Möller HB, et al. Short segment boneon-bone instrumentation for single curve idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2003; 28cny KOR S224-33.
6. Liljenqvist UR, Bullmann V, Schulte TL, et al. Anterior dual rod instrumentation in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2006; 15cny KOR 1118-27.
7. Saraph VJ, Krismer M, Wimmer C. Operative treatment of scoliosis with the Kaneda anterior spine system. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2005; 30cny KOR 1616-20.
8. Kelly DM, McCarthy RE, McCullough FL, et al. Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2010; 35cny KOR 194-8.
9. Sudo H, Ito M, Kaneda K, et al. Long-term outcomes of anterior dual rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a twelve to twenty three-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am; In pres.s.
10. Tis JE, O'Brien MF, Newton PO, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with open instrumented anterior spinal fusion: fi ve-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2010; 35cny KOR 64-70.
11. Newton PO, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, et al. Surgical treatment of lenke 1 main thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of a prospective, multi-center study. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2013; 38cny KOR 328-38.
12. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classifi cation to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83cny KOR 1169-81.
13. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2010; 35cny KOR 2224-31.
14. Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D, et al. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fi xation surgery: a comparison of two practices. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2009; 34cny KOR 1942-51.
15. Gitelman Y, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure: a 10-year follow-up analysis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2011; 36cny KOR 1665-72.
16. Lubicky JP, Hanson JE, Riley EH. Spinal deformity study group. Instrumentation constructs in pediatric patients undergoing deformity correction correlated with scoliosis research society scores. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2011; 36cny KOR 1692-700.
17. Newton PO, Upasani VV, Lhamby J, et al. Surgical treatment of main thoracic scoliosis with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: A fi ve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90cny KOR 2077-89.
18. Benli IT, Ates B, Akalin S, et al. Minimum 10 years follow-up surgical results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with TSRH instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2007; 16cny KOR 381-91.
19. Larson AN, Fletcher ND, Daniel C, et al. Lumbar curve is stable after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 20-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2012; 37cny KOR 833-9.
20. Potter BK, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG. Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2005; 30cny KOR 1859-66.
21. Harms J, Jeszenszky D, Beele B. Ventral correction of thoracic scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL, eds. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphiacny KOR Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1997cny KOR 611-26
22. Kuklo TR, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, et al. Comparison of the lowest instrumented, stable, and lower end vertebrae in single overhang thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior versus posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2006; 31cny KOR 2232-6.
23. Sucato DJ, Agrawal S, O'Brien MF, et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2008; 33cny KOR 2630-6.
24. Schmidt C, Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, et al. Sagittal balance of thoracic lordoscoliosis: anterior dual rod instrumentation versus posterior pedicle screw fi xation. Eur Spine J 2011; 20cny KOR 1118-26.
25. Kusakabe T, Mehta JS, Gaines RW. Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a mean followup of six years. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2011; 36cny KOR 1123-30.
26. Lonner BS, Lazar-Antman MA, Sponseller PD, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with kyphosis maintenance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2012; 37cny KOR 1297-302.
27. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. A prospective evaluation of pulmonary function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical approach used for spinal arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2000; 25cny KOR 82-90.
28. Graham EJ, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, et al. Prospective pulmonary function evaluation following open thoracotomy for anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2000; 25cny KOR 2319-25.
29. Deviren V, Patel VV, Metz LN, et al. Anterior arthrodesis with instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis: comparison of effi cacy in adults and adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2008; 33cny KOR 1219-23.