Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 194-198

  Kelly, Derek M ^a   McCarthy, Richard E ^a   McCullough, Frances L ^a   Kelly, Hallie R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Anterior spine fusion; Long term outcomes; Lumbar curves; Thoracolumbar curves

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; BONE ATROPHY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINAL PAIN; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL ROD; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77749322303     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bc948e     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bernstein RM, Hall JE. Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 1998;7:124-31.
2. Haher TR, Merola A, Zipnick RI, et al. Meta-analysis of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A 35-year English literature review of 11,000 patients. Spine 1995;20:1575-84.
3. Hsu LC, Zucherman J, Tang SC, et al. Dwyer instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64:536-41.
4. Kohler R, Galland O, Mechin H, et al. The Dwyer procedure in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. A 10-year follow-up review of 21 patients. Spine 1990;15:75-80.
5. Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS. Zielke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature. Analysis of results in 66 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983:133-53.
6. Ogilvie JW. Anterior spine fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:313-7.
7. Turi M, Johnston CE II, Richards BS. Anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis using TSRH instrumentation. Spine 1993;18:417-22.
8. Bitan FD, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik PL, et al. The use of short and rigid anterior instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis: a retrospective review of 24 cases. Spine 2002;27:1553-7.
9. Otani K, Saito M, Sibasaki K. Anterior instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Int Orthop 1997;21:4-8.
10. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26: 1956-65.
11. Lowe TG, Betz R, Lenke L, et al. Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 2003;28:S208-16.
12. Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H, et al. Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: when can the associated thoracic curve be left unfused? Spine 2003;28:706-13, discussion 714.
13. Lowe TG, Alongi PR, Smith DA, et al. Anterior single rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without the use of structural interbody support. Spine 2003;28:2232-41, discussion 41-2.
14. Smith JA, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Does instrumented anterior scoliosis surgery lead to kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or inadequate correction in adults? Spine 2002;27:529-34.
15. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Maintaining lumbar lordosis with anterior single solid-rod instrumentation in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1655-62.
16. Fairbank J. Revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:2552.
17. Fairbank JC. The use of revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:2846-7.
18. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25: 2940-52; discussion 2952.
19. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society - 22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-8.
20. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society - 22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
21. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society - 22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
22. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24: 1435-40.
23. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-51.