Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A mean follow-up of six years

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 1123-1130

  Kusakabe, Takashi ^a,b   Mehta, Jwalant S ^b   Gaines, Robert W ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone on bone spinal fusion; Idiopathic scoliosis; Short segment fixation; Traction radiography

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY POSTURE; BONE ON BONE SPINAL FUSION; BONE SCREW; CASE STUDY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR SPINE; LUNG DISEASE; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OPERATION DURATION; PARALYTIC ILEUS; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE FUSION; THORACIC SPINE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; CHILD; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959943461     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f9a07a     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH III, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:225-39. (Pubitemid 29072207)
2. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, et al. Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A five to ten-year follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:807-14. (Pubitemid 28299700)
3. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Longterm functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2303-9. (Pubitemid 37499638)
4. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, et al. Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. More than 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30:1602-9.
5. Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA. An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969;62:192-202.
6. Zielke K, Stunkat R, Beaujean F. Ventrale derotations-spondylodeses. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1976;85:257-77.
7. Zielke K. Ventral derotation spondylodesis. Results of treatment of cases of idiopathic scoliosis. Z Orhtop Ihre Grenzgeb 1982;120:320-9. (Pubitemid 12098696)
8. Ouellet JA, Johnston CE II. Effect of grafting technique on the maintenance of coronal and sagittal correction in anterior treatment of scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:2129-36.
9. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 1996;21:1250-61.
10. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. Anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis with Kaneda anterior spinal system. A preliminary report. Spine 1997;22:1358-68.
11. Saraph VJ, Krismer M, Wimmer C. Operative treatment of scoliosis with the Kaneda anterior spine system. Spine 2005;30:1616-20. (Pubitemid 41022423)
12. Lowry KJ, Tobias J, Kittle D, et al. Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1290-3. (Pubitemid 32520508)
13. Brodner W, Yue WM, Möller HB, et al. Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for single curve idiopathic scoiosis. Spine 2003;28:S224-33. (Pubitemid 37266730)
14. Conolly PJ, Von Schroeder HP, Johnson GE, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term effect of instrumentation extending to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1210-16.
15. Bernstein RM, Hall JE. Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 1998;7:124-31. (Pubitemid 28182761)
16. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25(7):813-8. (Pubitemid 30214968)
17. Smith JA, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Does instrumented anterior scoliosis surgery lead to kyphosis, pseudarthrosis or inadequate correction in adults. Spine 2002;27(5):529-34. (Pubitemid 34461284)
18. Tis JE, O'Brien MF, Newton PO, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with open instrumented anterior spine fusion. Spine 2009;35(1):64-70.
19. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al. Are we improving postoperative sagittal contour with new posterior instrumentation compared to 'old school' instrumentation? Presented at: SRS 44th annual meeting;2009;San Antonio.
20. Upasani VV, Newton PO, Pawelek JB, et al. Preservation of thoracic kyphosis: a critical component to maintaining post-operative lumbar lordosis during the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scolisois. Presented at: SRS 43th Annual meeting;2008;Salt Lake City.
21. Newton PO, Upasani VV, Bastrom TP, et al. The deformity-flexibility quotient predicts both patient satisfaction and surgeon preference in the treatment of Lenke 1B or 1C curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(10):1032-9.
22. Luk KDK, Cheung KMC, Lu DS, et al. Assessment of scoliosis correction in relation to flexibility using the fulcrum bending correction index. Spine 1998;23:2303-7. (Pubitemid 28518578)
23. Takahashi S, Passuti N, Delécrin J. Interpretation and utility of traction radiography in scoliosis surgery. Analysis of patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 1997;22:2542-6. (Pubitemid 28070675)
24. Davis BJ, Gadgil A, Trivedi J, et al. Traction radiography performed under general anesthetic. A new technique for assessing idiopathic scoliosis curves. Spine 2004;29:2466-70. (Pubitemid 40353304)
25. Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, et al. Assessment of flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1637-42. (Pubitemid 41022427)
26. Sucato DS, Newton PO, Betz RR, et al. Patients who have a selective thoracic fusion for Lenke 1 and 2 curves have similar coronal balance but improved functional outcome scores at two years when compared to those fused into the lumbar spine. Presented at: SRS 42nd annual meeting;2007;Edinburgh.
27. Newton PO, Marks ME, Bastrom TP, et al. Post-operative trunk flexibility loss is modest but incremental as the fusion progresses distally. Presented at: SRS 43th annual meeting;2008;Salt Lake City.
28. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spine fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26(18):1956-65. (Pubitemid 32852089)
29. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher M, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. JBJS Am 2009;91:398-408.
30. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher M, et al. Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion. A comparative study utilising the SRS 22 outcome instrument. Spine 2009;34(2):193-8.
31. Lonner BS, Kondrachov D, Siddiqi F, et al. Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. JSJS Am 2006;88:1022-34.