Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 2630-2636

  Sucato, Daniel J ^a,e,f   Agrawal, Sundeep ^a   O'Brien, Michael F ^b   Lowe, Thomas G ^c   Richards, Stephens B ^a   Lenke, Lawrence ^d  

^a TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b Children's Hospital   (United States)

^c Woodridge Orthopaedic Clinic and Spine Center   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Texas Scottish Rite Hospital   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Sagittal plane; Thoracic kyphosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE STABILIZATION; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; INSTRUMENTATION; KIRSCHNER WIRE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VERTEBRA;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SCREWS; BONE WIRES; CHILD; DATABASES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58949088151     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181880498     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Moskowitz A, Moe JH, Winter RB, et al. Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:364-76.
2. Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Dimar JR II, et al. The impactof positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-9.
3. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:225-39.
4. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712-20.
5. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:813-8.
6. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH, et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:489 -95.
7. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, et al. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:627-32.
8. Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, et al. Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine 2007;32:448-52.
9. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:2350-6.
10. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional Course Lectures, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Ann Arbor: JW Edwards; 1948.
11. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001:1169-81.
12. Connolly PJ, Von Schroeder HP, Johnson GE, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term effect of instrumentation extending to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1210-6.
13. Kotwicki T, Dubousset J, Padovani J-P. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees-a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves. European Spine Journal: Official Publication Of The European Spine Society, The European Spinal Deformity Society, And The European Section Of The Cervical Spine Research Society 2006;15:972-81.
14. Potter BK, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG. Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves. Spine 2005;30:1859 - 66.
15. Liljenqvist UR, Bullmann V, Schulte TL, et al. Anterior dual rod instrumentation in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. European Spine Journal: Official Publication Of The European Spine Society, The European Spinal Deformity Society, And The European Section Of The Cervical Spine Research Society 2006;15:1118-27.
16. Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R, et al. Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 2006;31:299-302.
17. Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 2002;27:776-86.