Erratum to Why read online news? the structural relationships among motivations, behaviors, and consumption in south korea (Information, Communication and Society, (2012), 10.1080/1369118X.2012.724435);Why read online news? the structural relationships among motivations, behaviors, and consumption in south korea

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1574-1595

  You, Kyung Han ^a   Lee, Seoyeon Allison ^a   Lee, Jeong Kyu ^b   Kang, Hyunjin ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ClearWay Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

actual consumption; bootstrapping; motivation; online news; structural equation modeling (SEM); uses and gratifications (U G)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876950722     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.736695     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. Boczkowski, P. 2002. " The development and use of online newspapers: What research tells us and what we might want to know ". In The Handbook of New Media, Edited by: Lievrouw, L. and Livingstone, S. 270 - 286. London: Sage.
2. Brill, A. M. 2001. Online journalists embrace new marketing function. Newspaper Research Journal, 22 (2): 28 - 40.
3. Chang, W. 2005. Online civic participation, and political empowerment: Online media and public opinion formation in Korea. Media, Culture, & Society, 27 (6): 925 - 935. (doi:10.1177/0163443705057680)
4. Chung, D. S. 2007. Profits and perils: Online news producers' perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence, 13 (1): 43 - 61.
5. Deuze, M. 2003. The Web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of news media online. New Media & Society, 5 (2): 203 - 230. (doi:10.1177/1461444803005002004)
6. Eighmey, J. 1997. Profiling user responses to commercial Web sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 37 (3): 59 - 66.
7. Eppler, M. J. and Mengis, J. 2004. The concept of information overloaded: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society: An International Journal, 20 (5): 325 - 344. (doi:10.1080/01972240490507974)
8. Eveland, W. P. and Dunwoody, S. 2000. Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Mediapsychology, 2 (3): 219 - 244.
9. Eveland, W. P. Jr., Marton, K. and Seo, M. 2004. Moving beyond "just the factsSPiquotSPi: The influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research, 31 (1): 82 - 108. (doi:10.1177/0093650203260203)
10. Ferguson, D. A. and Perse, E. M. 2000. The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44 (2): 155 - 174. (doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_1)
11. Hayes, A. F. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monograph, 76 (4): 408 - 420. (doi:10.1080/03637750903310360)
12. Heider, D., McCombs, M. and Poindexter, P. 2005. What the public expects of local news on public and traditional journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82 (4): 952 - 967. (doi:10.1177/107769900508200412)
13. Heinström, J. 2005. Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information seeking behavior. Journal of Documentation, 61 (2): 228 - 247. (doi:10.1108/00220410510585205)
14. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M. and Lundqvist, D. 2003. " Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading ". In The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, Edited by: Hyona, J. R. and Deubel, H. 657 - 670. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Ltd.
15. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1): 1 - 55. (doi:10.1080/10705519909540118)
16. Im, Y., Kim, E., Kim, K. and Kim, Y. 2008. News perceptions and uses among online-news users. Korean Journal of Communication, 52 (4): 181 - 204.
17. Johnson, T. J. and Kaye, B. K. 2000. Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (4): 865 - 879. (doi:10.1177/107769900007700409)
18. Kang, H., Bae, K., Zhang, S. and Sundar, S. S. 2011. Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources?. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88 (4): 719 - 736.
19. Kaye, B. K. and Johnson, T. J. 2002. Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the Web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46 (1): 54 - 71. (doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4)
20. Ketterer, S. 1998. Teaching students how to evaluate and use online resources. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 52 (4): 4 - 14. (doi:10.1177/107769589705200401)
21. Kim, S. 2004. Exploring readers' activity: Focused on its conceptual dimensions and impact on readers' attitudes towards newspapers. Korean Journal of Communication, 48 (1): 284 - 309.
22. Kim, E. and Lee, J. 2006. Rethinking "reading" online: The effects of online communication. Korean Journal of Communication, 50 (4): 65 - 94.
23. King, S. A. 1996. Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. Information Society, 12 (2): 119 - 126. (doi:10.1080/713856145)
24. Kiousis, S. and Dimitrova, D. V. 2006. Differential impact of Web site content: Exploring the influence of source (public relations versus news), modality, and participation on college students' perceptions. Public Relations Review, 32 (2): 177 - 179. (doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.013)
25. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2, Edited by: Kline, R. B. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26. Ko, H., Cho, C.-H. and Roberts, M. S. 2005. Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34 (2): 57 - 70. (doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639191)
27. Korgaonkar, P. K. and Wolin, L. D. 1999. A multivariate analysis of Web usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (1): 53 - 68.
28. Lee, A. Y. L. and So, C. Y. K. 2002. Electronic newspaper as digital marketplaces. World Futures: The Journal of Global Education, 57 (5): 495 - 522. (doi:10.1080/02604027.2001.9972846)
29. Levy, M. R. and Windahl, S. 1984. Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11 (1): 51 - 78. (doi:10.1177/009365084011001003)
30. Lewenstein, M., Edwards, G., Tatar, D. and DeVigal, A. 2000. Stanford-Poynter Project: Eyetracking Online News, St Petersburg, FL: Poynter Institute.
31. Lin, C. A. 1999. Online service adoption likelihood. Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (2): 79 - 89.
32. Lin, C. A. (2001) 'Audience attributes, media supplementation, and likely online service adoption', Mass Communication and Society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19-38.
33. Mitchelstein, E. and Boczkowski, P. 2010. Online news consumption research: An assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New Media & Society, 12 (7): 1085 - 1102. (doi:10.1177/1461444809350193)
34. Morris, J. L. 2003. Audience identifies types of reporters, news consumers. Newspaper Research Journal, 24 (2): 36 - 49.
35. Muthen, L. K. and Muthen, B. O. 2007. Mplus User's Guide, Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
36. Newhagen, J. and Levy, M. R. 1997. " The future of journalism in a distributed communication architecture ". In The Electronic Grapevine: Rumor, Reputation and Reporting in the New Online Environment, Edited by: Borden, D. L. and Harvey, K. 9 - 21. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Newhagen, J. and Rafaeli, S. 1996. Why communication researchers should study the Internet: a dialogue. Journal of Communications, 46 (1): 4 - 13. (doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01458.x)
38. Oostendorp, V. H. and Nimwegen, C. 1998. Locating information in an online newspaper. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (1) [Online] Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue1/oostendorp.html (24 March 2011)
39. Palmgreen, P. 1984. " Uses and gratifications: a theoretical perspective ". In Communication Yearbook 8, Edited by: Bostrom, R. 20 - 55. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Papacharissi, Z. and Rubin, A. M. 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44 (2): 175 - 196. (doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2)
41. Parker, B. J. and Plank, R. E. 2000. A uses and gratifications perspective on the Internet as a new information source. American Business Review, 18 (2): 43 - 49.
42. Perry, D. K. and Pasadeos, Y. 2002. Perceptions of sensationalism among U.S. and Mexican news audiences. Newspaper Research Journal, 23 (1): 82 - 86.
43. Perse, E. M. & Ferguson, D. A. (2000) 'Web surfing satisfaction', paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Seattle, CA.
44. Pew Research Center. (2004, June 8) 'News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audience larger, more diverse', [Online] Available at: http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/215.pdf (24 March 2011).
45. Pew Research Center for People & The Press. (2010, March 1) 'Understanding the participatory news consumer', [Online] Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx (24 March 2011).
46. Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. 2008. " Contemporary approach to assessing mediation in communication research ". In The Sage Source Book of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research, Edited by: Hayes, A. F., Slater, M. D. and Snyder, L. B. 13 - 54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Rittenberg, J. and Tewksbury, D. Browsing through the news: Determining predictors of linear behavior on an online news site. paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA. Chicago, IL, November 2007
48. Rubin, A. M. and Perse, E. M. 1987. Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, 14 (1): 58 - 84. (doi:10.1177/009365087014001004)
49. Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1): 3 - 37. (doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02)
50. Sundar, S. S. 1998. Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75 (1): 55 - 68. (doi:10.1177/107769909807500108)
51. Sundar, S. S. and Nass, C. 2001. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51 (1): 52 - 72. (doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x)
52. Sundar, S. S., Knobloch-Westerwick, S. and Hastall, M. R. 2007. News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (3): 366 - 378. (doi:10.1002/asi.20511)
53. Tewksbury, D. 2003. What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 53 (4): 694 - 710. (doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02918.x)
54. Tewksbury, D. and Rittenberg, J. 2009. " Online news creation and consumption: Implication for modern democracies. In Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, Edited by: Chadwick, A. and Howard, P. 186 - 200. London: Routledge.
55. Ward, M. (2002) Journalism Online, Focal Press, Woburn, MA.