SNP-based heritability estimation using a Bayesian approach

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 531-539

  Krag, K ^a   Janss, L L ^a   Shariati, M M ^a,b   Berg, P ^a   Buitenhuis, A J ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Bayesian prediction; heritability; simulation study; SNP markers

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SAMPLE SIZE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SAMPLE SIZE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84876903616     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112002017     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. George EI and McCulloch RE 1993. Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 881-889.
2. Goddard ME and Hayes BJ 2009. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature reviews. Genetics 10, 381-391.
3. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ and Meuwissen THE 2010. Genomics selection in farm animal species - lessons learnt and future perspectives. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD-Rom Communication 0701.
4. Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME 2006. Use of markers in linkage disequilibrium with QTL in breeding programs. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, pp. 30-06.
5. Ihara N, Takasuga A, Mizoshita K, Takeda H, Sugimoto M, Mizoguchi Y, Hirano T, Itoh T, Watanabe T, Reed KM, Snelling WM, Kappes SM, Beattie CW, Bennett GL and Sugimoto Y 2004. A comprehensive genetic map of the cattle genome based on 3802 microsatellites. Genome Research 14, 1987-1998.
6. Janss LLG 2010. iBay. Bayesian Solutions, Leiden, The Netherlands.
7. Krag K, Janss L, Shariati MM and Buitenhuis AJ 2010. Heritability estimation based on small sample size using SNP markers. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, CD-Rom Communication 0654.
8. Madsen P and Jensen J 2007. An User's guide to DMU. A package for Analysing Multivariate Mixed Models. Version 6, release 4.7. Aarhus University, Denmark.
9. Makowsky R, Pajewski NM, Klimentidis YC, Vazquez AI, Duarte CW, Allison DB and de los Campos G 2011. Beyond missing heritability: prediction of complex traits. PLoS Genetics 7(4): e1002051.
10. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ and Goddard ME 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829.
11. Mrode RA and Thompson R 2005. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
12. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) 2005. MGI Genetic Map of the Mouse Genome (Mus musculus). Retrieved February 1, 2005, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genomes/.
13. Pribyl J, Rehout V, Citek J and Pribylova J 2010. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using a simple heritable genetic ground. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90, 1765-1773.
14. R Development Core Team 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
15. Rutten MJM, Bovenhuis H, Hettinga KA, van Valenberg HJF and van Arendonk JAM 2009. Predicting bovine milk fat composition using infrared spectroscopy based on milk samples collected in winter and summer. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 6202-6209.
16. Sargolzaei M and Schenkel FS 2009. QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics 25, 680-681.
17. Schwartz MK, Luikart G and Waples RS 2007. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 25-33.
18. Sved JA 1971. Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theoretical Population Biology 2, 125-141.
19. Thomas SC, Pemberton JM and Hill WG 2000. Estimating variance components in natural populations using inferred relationships. Heredity 84, 427-436.
20. VanRaden PM 2007. Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding. In Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 33-36.
21. Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA, Thompson R and Calus MP 2011. Genomic and pedigree-based genetic parameters for scarcely recorded traits when some animals are genotyped. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4189-4197.
22. Verbyla KL, Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ and Goddard ME 2009. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genetics Research 91, 307-311.
23. Villumsen TM, Janss L and Lund MS 2009. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 126, 3-13.
24. Visscher PM, Hill WG and Wray NR 2008. Heritability in the genomics era - concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews. Genetics 9, 255-266.
25. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MA, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW and Martin NG 2006. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genetics 2, 316-325.
26. Wenne R, Boudry P, Hemmer-Hansen J, Lubieniecki KP, Was A and Kause A 2007. What role for genomics in fisheries management and aquacultureAquatic Living Resources 20, 241-255.