Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using a simple heritable genetic ground

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1765-1773

  Pribyl, Josef ^a   Rehout, Vaclav ^b   Citek, Jindrich ^b   Pribylova, Jana ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Genomic breeding value; Genomic relationship; Linear model; Methods; QTL; SNP

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 77954394668     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4041     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Czarnik U, Galinski M, Pareek ChS, Zabolewicz T and Wielgosz-Groth Z, Study of an association between SNP 775C>T within the bovine ITBG2 gene and milk performance traits in Black and White cows. Czech J Anim Sci 52:1 - 6 (2007).
2. Van Raden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, et al, Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 92:16 - 24 (2009).
3. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME, Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.J Dairy Sci 92:433-443 (2009).
4. Seefried F, Liu Z, Thaller G and Reinhadt F, Genomic breeding value of German Holstein. Zuchtungskunde 82:14 - 21 (2010).
5. Guillaume F, Fritz S, Boichard D and Druet T, Short communication: Correlations of marker-assisted breeding values with progeny test breeding values for eight hundred ninety-nine French Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 91:2520 - 2522 (2008).
6. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D, Legarra A, Tsuruta S and Lawlor TJ, Hot topic: An unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for a genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 93:743 - 752 (2010).
7. Ben Jemaa S, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Druet T, Denis C, Eggen A, et al, Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting non-return rate in French dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 125:280 - 288 (2008).
8. Holmberg M, Sahana G and Andersson-Eklund L, Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 9 affecting non-return rate in Swedish dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 124:257-263 (2007).
9. Interbull, [Online]. Available: http://www.interbull.org [21 October 2009].
10. Amaral AJ, Megens HJ, Kerstens HHD, Heuven HCM, Dibbits B, Crooijmans RPMA, et al, Application of massive parallel sequencing to whole genome SNP discovery in the porcine genome. BMC Genomics 10:374 (2009).
11. Muir WM, Wong GK, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen MAM, Crooijmans RPMA, et al, Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17312 - 17317 (2008).
12. Misztal I, Reliable computing in estimation of variance components. J Anim Breed Genet 125:363 - 370 (2008).
13. Veselá Z, Přibyl J, Šafus P, Vostrý L, Scaron;eba K and Štolc L, Breeding value for type traits in beef cattle in the Czech Republic. Czech J Anim Sci 50:385 - 393 (2005).
14. Krejčová H, Přibyl J, Přibylová J, Št́ipková M and Mielenz N, Genetic evaluation of daily gains of dual-purpose bulls using a random regression model. Czech J Anim Sci 53:227 - 237 (2008).
15. Oravcová M, Marget́in M, Peškovičová D, Daňo J, Milerski M, Hetényi L, et al, Factors affecting ewe's milk fat and protein content and relationships between milk yield and milk components. Czech J Anim Sci 52:189 - 198 (2007).
16. Přibyl J, Krejč ová H, Přibylová J, Misztal I, Bohmanová J and Štípková M, Trajectory of body weight of performance tested dual purpose bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 52:315 - 324 (2007).
17. Přibyl J, Krejčová H, Přibylová J, Misztal I, Tsuruta S and Mielenz N, Models for evaluation of growth of performance tested bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 53:45 - 54 (2008).
18. Přibyl J, Přibylová J, Krejčová H and Mielenz N, Comparison of different traits to evaluate the growth of bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 53:273 - 283 (2008).
19. Zavadilová L, Jamrozik J and Schaeffer LR, Genetic parameters for test- day model with random regressions for production traits of Czech Holstein cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 50:142 - 154 (2005).
20. Vostrý L, Přibyl J, Jakubec V, Veselá Z and Majzl ́ik I, Selection of a suitable definition of environment for the estimation of genotype × environment interaction in the weaning weight of beef cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 53:407 - 417 (2008).
21. Vostrý L, Přibyl J, Veselá Z and Jakubec V, Selection of a suitable data set and model for the estimation of genetic parameters of the weaning weight in beef cattle. Arch Tierz 50:562 - 574 (2007).
22. Mészáros G, Wolf J and Kadlečík O, Factors affecting the functional length of productive life in Slovak Pinzgau cows. Czech J Anim Sci 53:9 - 97 (2008).
23. Páchová E, Zavadilová L and Sölkner J, Genetic evaluation of the length of productive life in Holstein cattle in the Czech. Czech J Anim Sci 50:493 - 498 (2005).
24. Bozdogan H, Akaike's information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. J Math Psychol 44:62 - 91 (2000).
25. Guo Z and Schaeffer LR, Random regression submodel comparison, in 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), Montpellier, France, 19 - 23 August (2002).
26. Kaas ER and Raftery AE, Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773 - 795 (1995).
27. Sorensen D and Waagepetersen R, Model selection for prediction of breeding value, in 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), Montpellier, France, 19 - 23 August (2002).
28. Kaps M and Lamberson W, Biostatistics for Animal Science. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK (2004).
29. Přibyl J, [A way of using markers for farm animals selection] (in Czech). Ziv Vyr 40:375 - 382 (1995).
30. Schaeffer LR, Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123:218 - 223 (2006).
31. Baierl A, Bogdan M, Frommlet F and Futschik A, On locating multiple interacting quantitative trait loci in intercross designs. Genetics 173:1693 - 1703 (2006).
32. Szyda J and Komisarek J, Statistical modeling of candidate gene effects on milk production traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 90:297 - 2979 (2007).
33. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ and Goddard ME, Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819 - 1829 (2001).
34. Muir WM, Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124:342 - 355 (2007).
35. Dekkers JCM, Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 124:331 - 341 (2007).
36. Falconer DS and Mackay TFC, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longmans Green, Harlow, UK (1996).
37. Milerski M, The Booroola (FecB) gene in Czech Merinolandschaft population, in 59th Annual Meeting of EAAP (Book of abstracts 191), Vilnius, Lithuania, 24 - 27 August (2008).
38. Soller M and Genizi A, The efficiency of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between a marker locus and a locus affecting a quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics 34:47-55 (1978).
39. Dolezal M, Schwarzenbacher H, Soller M, Sölkner J and Visscher PM, Multiple-marker mapping for selective DNA pooling within large families. J Dairy Sci 91:2864 - 2873 (2008).
40. Visscher PM, Proportion of the variation in genetic composition in backcrossing programs explained by genetic markers. J Hered 87:136 - 138 (1996).
41. Freyer G, Sørensen P, Kühn C and Weikard R, Investigations in the character of QTL affecting negatively correlated milk traits. J Anim Breed Genet 121:40-51 (2004).
42. Ansari-Mahyari S, Sørensen AC, Lund MS, Thomsen H and Berg P, Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes. JDairy Sci 91:1628 - 1639 (2008).
43. Calus MPL and Veerkamp RF, Accuracy of breeding value when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J Anim Breed Genet 124:362 - 368 (2007).
44. Gengler N, Abras S, Verkenne C, Vanderick S, Szydlowski M and Renaville R, Accuracy of prediction of gene content in large animal populations and its use for candidate gene detection and genetic evaluation. J Dairy Sci 91:1652 - 1659 (2008).
45. Szyda J, Ptak E, Komisarek J and Zarnecki A, Practical application of daughter yield deviations in dairy cattle breeding. J Appl Genet 49:83 - 191 (2008).
46. Simianer H and Stricker C, Mapping of quantitative trait loci, in Genomics and Biotechnology in Livestock Breeding, ed. By Schellander K, Li N, Neeteson AM and Wimmers K. Shaker, Aachen, pp. 47-58 (2002).
47. B́ilek K, Knoll A, Stratil A, Svobodová K, Horák P, Bechyňová R, et al, Analysis of mRNA expression of CNN3, DCN, FBN2, POSTN, SPARC and YWHAQ genes in porcine foetal and adult skeletal muscles. Czech J Anim Sci 53:181 - 186 (2008).
48. Pan CY, Lan XY, Chen H, Yang DY, Hua LS, Yang XB, et al, A DdeI PCR- RFLP detecting a novel missense mutation of the POU1F1 gene showed no effects on growth traits in cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 53:532 - 527 (2008).
49. Spangler ML, Sapp RL, Bertrand JK, MacNeil MD and Rekaya R, Different methods of selecting animals for genotyping to maximize the amount of genetic information known in the population. J Anim Sci 86:2471 - 2479 (2008).
50. 2 crosses between outbred lines. J Anim Breed Genet 125:35 - 44 (2008).
51. Weller JI, Kashi Y and Soller M, Power of daughter and granddaughter design for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 73:2525 - 2537 (1990).
52. Freyer G and Vukasinovic N, Comparison of granddaughter design and general pedigree design analysis of QTL in dairy cattle: a simulation study. Czech J Anim Sci 50:545 - 552 (2005).
53. Goliášová E and Wolf J, Herd specific effects of the ESR gene on litter size and production traits in Czech Large White sows. Czech J Anim Sci 49:373 - 382 (2004).
54. Legarra A and Misztal I, Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J Dairy Sci 91:360 - 366 (2008).
55. Meuwissen THE and Goddard ME, Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes. Genet Sel Evol 33:605-634 (2001).
56. Humpolíček P, Urban T, Matoušek V and Tvrdoň Z, Effect of estrogen receptor, follicle stimulating hormone and myogenin genes on the performance of Large White sows. Czech J Anim Sci 52:334 - 340 (2007).
57. Vykoukalová Z, Knoll A and Cepica S, Porcine perilipin (PLIN) gene: structure, polymorphism and association study in Large White pigs. Czech J Anim Sci 54:359 - 364 (2009).
58. Hradecká E, Číitek J, Panicke L, Řehout V and Hanusová L, The relation of GH1, GHR and DGAT1 polymorphisms with estimated breeding values for milk production traits of German Holstein sires. Czech J Anim Sci 53:238 - 246 (2008).
59. Matějíiček A, Matějíičková J, Němcová E, Jandurová OM, Št́ipková M, Bouška J, et al, Joint effects of CSN3 and LGB genotypes and their relation to breeding values of milk production parameters in Czech Fleckvieh. Czech J Anim Sci 52:83 - 87 (2007).
60. Matěj́iček A, Matěj́ičková J, Št́ipková M, Hanuš O, Genčurová V, Kysel'ová J, et al, Joint effects of CSN3 and LGB genes on milk quality and coagulation properties in Czech Fleckvieh. Czech J Anim Sci 53:246 - 252 (2008).
61. Van Raden PM and Wiggans GR, Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. JDairy Sci 74:2737 - 2746 (1991).
62. Neuner S, Emmerling R, Thaller G and Gö tz KU, Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in Marker-Assisted Best Linear Unbiased Predictors models in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 91:4344 - 4354 (2008).
63. Harder B, Bennewitz J, Reinsch N, Thaller G, Thomsen H, Kühn C, et al, Mapping of quantitative trait loci for lactation persistency traits in German Holstein dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123:89 - 96 (2006).
64. Uleberg E, Widerøe IS, Grindflek E, Szyda J, Lien S and Meuwissen THE, Fine mapping of a QTL for intramuscular fat on porcine chromosome 6 using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. J Anim Breed Genet 122:1 - 6 (2005).
65. Goddard ME and Hayes BJ, Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 124:323 - 330 (2007).
66. Weller JI, Golik M, Seroussi E, Ezra E and Ron M, Population-wide analysis of a QTL affecting milk-fat production in the Israeli Holstein population. J Dairy Sci 86:2219 - 2227 (2003).
67. SAS, SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (2005).
68. Li FE, Mei SQ, Deng CY, Jiang SW, Zuo B, Zheng R, et al, Association of a microsatellite flanking FSHB gene with reproductive traits and reproductive tract components in pigs. Czech J Anim Sci 53:139 - 144 (2008).
69. Michalcová A and Krupová Z, Influence of compositeκ -casein and β -lactoglobulin genotypes on composition, rennetability and heat stability of milk of cows of Slovak Pied breed. Czech J Anim Sci 52:292 - 298 (2007).
70. Tsuruta S and Misztal I, Technical note: Computing options for genetic evaluation with a large number of genetic markers. J Anim Sci 86:1514 - 1518 (2008).
71. Long N, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA and Avendaño S, Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers. J Anim Breed Genet 124:377 - 389 (2007).
72. Van Raden PM, Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414 - 4423 (2008).
73. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM and Goddard ME, Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realised relationship matrix. Genet Res Camb 91:47 - 60 (2009).
74. Guo SW, Variation in genetic identity among relatives. Hum Hered 46:61 - 70 (1996).
75. Misztal I, Legarra A and Aguilar I, Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92:4648 - 4655 (2009).
76. Legarra A, Aguilar I and Misztal I, A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92:4656 - 4663 (2009).