Treatment Effect Versus Pretreatment Recovery in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study Regarding the Effectiveness of Postacute Rehabilitation

PM and R

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 319-327

  Hayden, Mary Ellen ^a   Plenger, Patrick ^b   Bison, Kier ^c   Kowalske, Karen ^d   Masel, Brent ^e   Qualls, Devin ^f  

^a Pate Rehabilitation   (United States)

^b Reata Pharma   (United States)

^c Program Development Pate Rehabilitation   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Transitional Learning Center at Galveston   (United States)

^f Research and Therapy Development Pate Rehabilitation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; CONVALESCENCE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INJURY SEVERITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTACUTE REHABILITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84876870605     PISSN: 19341482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Faul M., Xu L., Wald M.M., Coronado V.G. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths 2010, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA.
2. Davis A.E. Cognitive impairments following traumatic brain injury: Etiologies and interventions. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2000, 12:447-456.
3. Ratan R.R., Noble M. Novel multi-modal strategies to promote brain and spinal cord injury recovery. Stroke 2009, 40(Suppl):S130-S132.
4. Kolb B., Cioe J., Williams P. Neuronal organization and change after brain injury. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation 2011, 13-37. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.A. Raskin (Ed.).
5. Buonomano J., Merzenich M.M. Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998, 21:149-186.
6. Friedman R.M., Chen L.M., Roe R.W. Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:1272-1279.
7. Nudo R.J., Bury S. Motor and sensory reorganization in primates. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation 2011, 65-102. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.A. Raskin (Ed.).
8. Jones T.A. Experience-dependent changes in nonhumans. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation 2011, 38-64. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.A. Raskin (Ed.).
9. Morris D.M., Bickel C.S. Activity-based interventions for neurorehabilitation. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation 2011, 117-148. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.A. Raskin (Ed.).
10. Kleim J.A., Jones T.A. Principles of experience dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008, 51:S225-S239.
11. Rijntjes M. Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: New insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Curr Opin Neurol 2006, 19:76-83.
12. Saur D., Lange R., Baumagaertner A., et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006, 129:1371-1384.
13. Lillie R.A., Mateer C.A. Neuronal organization and change after brain injury. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation 2011, 257-284. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.A. Raskin (Ed.).
14. Seung S. Connectome: How the Brain's Wiring Makes Us Who We Are 2012, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York, NY.
15. Biernaskie J., Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci 2001, 21:5272-5280.
16. Johansson B.B. Functional outcome in rats transferred to an enriched environment 15 days after focal brain ischemia. Stroke 1996, 27:324-326.
17. Will B., Kelche C. Environmental approaches to recovery of function from brain damage: A review of animal studies (1981 to 1991). Recovery From Brain Damage: Reflections and Directions 1992, 799-804. Plenum Press, New York, NY. F.D. Rose, D.A. Johnson (Eds.).
18. Johansson B.B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: The Willis Lecture. Stroke 2000, 223-230.
19. Kleim J.A., Jones T.A., Shallert T. Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before or after brain injury. Neurochem Res 2003, 28:1757-1769.
20. Will B., Galani R., Kelche C., Rosenzweig M.R. Recovery from brain injury in animals: Relative efficacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or formal training (1990-2002). Prog Neurobiol 2004, 72:167-182.
21. de Witt B.W., Ehrenberg K.M., McAloon R.L., et al. Abbreviated environmental enrichment enhances neurobehavioral recovery comparably to continuous exposure after traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25:343-350.
22. Schallert T., Leasure L., Kolb B. Experience-associated structural events, subependymal cellular proliferative activity, and functional recovery after injury to the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000, 20:1513-1528.
23. Carmichael S.T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: Making waves. Ann Neurol 2006, 59:735-742.
24. Levin M.F., Kleim J.A., Wolf S.L. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:313-319.
25. Taub E., Crago J.E., Burgio L.D., et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994, 61:281-293.
26. Wolf S.L., Lecraw D.E., Barton L.A., Jann B.B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989, 104:125-132.
27. Eriksson P.S., Perfilieva E., Björk-Eriksson T., et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 1998, 4:1313-1317.
28. Gray D.S. Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury: A review of outcomes and rehabilitation effectiveness. Brain Inj 2000, 14:1003-1014.
29. Kliem J.A. Neural plasticity and neurorehabilitation: Teaching the new brain old tricks. J Commun Disord 2011, 44:521-528.
30. Nakamura T., Hillary F.G., Biswal B.B. Resting network plasticity following brain injury. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8220.
31. Muñoz-Cespedes J.M., Rios-Lago M., Paul N., Maestu F. Functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive recovery after acquired brain damage in adults. Neuropsychol Rev 2005, 15:169-183.
32. Zorowitz R., Brainin M. Advances in brain recovery and rehabilitation 2010. Stroke 2011, 42:294-297.
33. Chen H., Epstein J., Stern E. Neural plasticity after acquired brain injury: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. PM R 2010, 2(Suppl 2):S306-S312.
34. Wittenburg G.F. Experience, cortical remapping, and recovery in brain disease. Neurobiol Dis 2010, 37:252-258.
35. Turner-Stokes L. The evidence for the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation following acquired brain injury. Clin Med 2004, 4:10-12.
36. Carod-Artal F.J., Medeiros M.S., Horan T.A., Braga L.W. Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2005, 19:667-673.
37. Micklewright J.L., Yutsis M., Smigielski J.S., Brown A.W., Bergquist T.F. Point of entry and functional outcomes after comprehensive day treatment participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011, 92:1974-1978.
38. High W.M., Roebuck-Spencer T., Sander A.M., Struchen M.A., Sherer M. Early versus later admission to postacute rehabilitation: Impact on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87:334-342.
39. Slade A., Tennant A., Chamberlain M.A. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2002, 34:260-266.
40. Turner-Stokes L., Disler P.B., Nair A., Wade D.T. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, (3). CD004170.
41. Cappa K.A., Conger J.C., Conger A.J. Injury severity and outcome: A meta-analysis of prospective studies on TBI outcome. Health Psychol 2011, 30:542-560.
42. Waehrens E.E., Fisher A.G. Improving quality of ADL performance after rehabilitation among people with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther 2007, 14:250-257.
43. Hayden M.E., Moreault A.M., LeBlanc J., Plenger P.M. Reducing level of handicap in traumatic brain injury: An environmentally based model of treatment. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000, 15:1000-1021.
44. Malec J.F., Thompson J.M. Relationship of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory to functional outcome and cognitive performance measures. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1994, 9:1-15.
45. Malec J. The Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury 2005, Accessed August 31, 2012. http://www.tbims.org/combi/mpai.
46. Bowers D., Kofroth L. Comparison: Disability Rating Scale and Functional Independence Measure during recovery from traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989, 70:A58.
47. Malec J.F., Kragness M., Evans R.W., Finlay K.L., Kent A., Lezak M.D. Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a national sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003, 18:479-492.
48. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
49. Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M., Ochs M.T., Allard T., Guíc-Robles E. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1990, 63:82-104.
50. Wang X., Merzenich M.M., Sameshima K., Jenkins W.M. Remodeling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation. Nature 1995, 378:71-75.