Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: New insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies

Current Opinion in Neurology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 76-83

  Rijntjes, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Hemiparesis; Recovery; Reorganization; Stroke

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMIPARESIS; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROBIOLOGY; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; REVIEW; STROKE; SURVIVAL TIME; SYMPTOM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 31644443768     PISSN: 13507540     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000203886.28068.38     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Ward NS. Functional reorganization of the cerebral motor system after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2004; 17:725-730.
2. Price CJ, Crinion J. The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2005; 18:429-434.
3. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, et al. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991; 29:63-71.
4. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, et al. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol 1992; 31:463-472.
5. Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJ, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 1993; 33:181-189.
6. Weiller C, Isensee C, Rijntjes M, et al. Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol 1995; 37:723-732.
7. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126 (Pt 11):2476-2496.
8. Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. Neuroimage 2003; 20:2166-2180.
9. Heiss WD, Kessler J, Thiel A, et al. Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol 1999; 45:430-438.
10. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33:1610-1617.
11. Nhan H, Barquist K, Bell K, et al. Brain function early after stroke in relation to subsequent recovery. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004; 24:756-763.
12. de Boissezon X, Demonet JF, Puel M, et al. Subcortical aphasia: a longitudinal PET study. Stroke 2005; 36:1467-1473. A longitudinal PET study of seven aphasic patients with two measurements over 1 year, showing an increase in activation in bilateral language-related areas and correlation of activation with improvement, mainly in the left inferior temporal gyrus.
13. Schmidlin E, Wannier T, Bloch J, Rouiller EM. Progressive plastic changes in the hand representation of the primary motor cortex parallel incomplete recovery from a unilateral section of the corticospinal tract at cervical level in monkeys. Brain Res 2004; 1017:172-183. After subtotal hemisection of the spinal cord at level C7/C8 in monkeys, microstimulation reveals that the contralateral hand representation in primary motor cortex first disappears and in the following 6 weeks reappears, correlating with recovery.
14. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, et al. Motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb after stroke: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates. Stroke 2005; 36:625-629. A longitudinal PET study in nine motor stroke patients over 6 months, showing a dynamic reorganization with first an increase and then a decrease in the non-affected hemisphere.
15. Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, et al. A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 2004; 23:827-839. A longitudinal fMRI study in eight pure motor stroke patients with lacunar infarctions showing an early reorganization in supplementary motor area and ipsilateral motor-related areas, and later a shift of activation to the affected hemisphere. All phases correlated with recovery.
16. Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, et al. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 2005; 128 (Pt 5):1122-1138. Four patients with an ischemic lesion in primary motor cortex were investigated with fMRI using a finger tapping and a finger extension paradigm. Over time, there was a functional dissociation of the activations in primary motor cortex related to these paradigms, suggesting different reorganizational processes for different movements.
17. Fernandez B, Cardebat D, Demonet JF, et al. Functional MRI follow-up study of language processes in healthy subjects and during recovery in a case of aphasia. Stroke 2004; 35:2171-2176.
18. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Early activation and time course of recovery in aphasia: a longitudinal fMRI study. NeuroImage 2004; 22:S25.
19. Serrien DJ, Strens LH, Cassidy MJ, et al. Functional significance of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement of the affected hand after stroke. Exp Neurol 2004; 190:425-432.
20. Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, et al. Sequential activation brain mapping after subcortical stroke: changes in hemispheric balance and recovery. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3883-3886.
21. Kurland J, Naeser MA, Baker EH, et al. Test-retest reliability of fMRI during nonverbal semantic decisions in moderate-severe nonfluent aphasia patients. Behav Neurol 2004; 15:87-97.
22. Musso M, Weiller C, Kiebel S, et al. Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain 1999; 122 (Pt 9):1781-1790.
23. Pulvermuller F, Hauk O, Zohsel K, et al. Therapy-related reorganization of language in both hemispheres of patients with chronic aphasia. Neuroimage 2005; 28:481-489.
24. Butefisch CM. Plasticity in the human cerebral cortex: lessons from the normal brain and from stroke. Neuroscientist 2004; 10:163-173.
25. Foltys H, Krings T, Meister IG, et al. Motor representation in patients rapidly recovering after stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2404-2415.
26. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, et al. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:14518-14523.
27. Ago T, Kitazono T, Ooboshi H, et al. Deterioration of pre-existing hemiparesis brought about by subsequent ipsilateral lacunar infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74:1152-1153.
28. Fisher CM. Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can J Neurol Sci 1992; 19:57-63.
29. Winhuisen L, Thiel A, Schumacher B, et al. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke 2005; 36:1759-1763. In recovered aphasic patients, first the involvement of Broca's homologue in langue tasks was demonstrated. When this area was suppressed with rTMS, five out of eight patients deteriorated again, strongly suggesting that in these patients, Broca's homologue was functionally relevant in recovery.
30. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2004; 25:181-191.
31. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang 2005; 93:95-105.
32. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005; 16:1551-1555.
33. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005; 64:1802-1804.
34. Marshall RS. The functional relevance of cerebral hemodynamics: why blood flow matters to the injured and recovering brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2004; 17:705-709.
35. Sobesky J, Zaro Weber O, Lehnhardt FG, et al. Does the mismatch match the penumbra? Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in early ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005; 36:980-985.
36. Kleiser R, Wittsack HJ, Butefisch CM, et al. Functional activation within the PI-DWI mismatch region in recovery from ischemic stroke: preliminary observations. Neuroimage 2005; 24:515-523.
37. Reineck LA, Agarwal S, Hillis AE. 'Diffusion-clinical mismatch' is associated with potential for early recovery of aphasia. Neurology 2005; 64:828-833. In a large group of acute stroke patients with aphasia, it was possible to approximate the size of the PWI region with clinical tests.
38. Krainik A, Hund-Georgiadis M, Zysset S, von Cramon DY. Regional impairment of cerebrovascular reactivity and BOLD signal in adults after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36:1146-1152.
39. Fujioka H, Kaneko H, Suzuki SS, Mabuchi K. Hyperexcitability-associated rapid plasticity after a focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2004; 35:e346-e348. Evoked field potentials show a peri-infarct hyperexcitability after peripheral stimulation as early as 1 h after experimental stroke in rats.
40. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17:48-57.
41. Baron JC, Cohen LG, Cramer SC, et al. Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 18:260-267.
42. Jang SH, Kim YH, Chang Y, et al. The predictive value of cortical activation by passive movement for motor recovery in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22:59-63.
43. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Yang DS, et al. Cortical reorganization of hand motor function to primary sensory cortex in hemiparetic patients with a primary motor cortex infarct. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:1706-1708.
44. Luft AR, Waller S, Forrester L, et al. Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 2004; 21:924-935.
45. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115:2144-2150.
46. Sharp DJ, Scott SK, Wise RJ. Retrieving meaning after temporal lobe infarction: the role of the basal language area. Ann Neurol 2004; 56:836-846. A PET study comparing controls with chronic aphasic patients who had an infarction in the superior temporal cortex, showing that activation of the disconnected basal temporal language regions depends on the quality of perceptual input.
47. Buss A, Pech K, Merkler D, et al. Sequential loss of myelin proteins during Wallerian degeneration in the human spinal cord. Brain 2005; 128:356.
48. Thomalla G, Glauche V, Weiller C, Rother J. Time course of Wallerian degeneration after ischaemic stroke revealed by diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:266-268.
49. Thomalla G, Glauche V, Koch MA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging detects early Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke. Neuroimage 2004; 22:1767-1774.
50. Jang SH, Cho SH, Kim YH, et al. Diffusion anisotrophy in the early stages of stroke can predict motor outcome. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2005; 23:11-17.
51. Konishi J, Yamada K, Kizu O, et al. MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts. Neurology 2005; 64:108-113.
52. Wenzelburger R, Kopper F, Frenzel A, et al. Hand coordination following capsular stroke. Brain 2005; 128 (Pt 1):64-74. Standard anatomical imaging can be used to demonstrate that the more posterior the ischemic lesion in the internal capsula, the more pronounced the chronic deficits.
53. Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy H. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22:245-260.
54. Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Inflammation in central nervous system injury. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358:1669-1677.
55. Felling RJ, Levison SW. Enhanced neurogenesis following stroke. J Neurosci Res 2003; 73:277-283.
56. Darsalia V, Heldmann U, Lindvall O, Kokaia Z. Stroke-induced neurogenesis in aged brain. Stroke 2005; 36:1790-1795.
57. van Mier HI, Perlmutter JS, Petersen SE. Functional changes in brain activity during acquisition and practice of movement sequences. Motor Control 2004; 8:500-520.
58. Floyer-Lea A, Matthews PM. Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94:512-518. During training of a motor sequence in healthy individuals over a 3-week period, first a decrease and then an increase in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex is observed.
59. Meister I, Krings T, Foltys H, et al. Effects of long-term practice and task complexity in musicians and nonmusicians performing simple and complex motor tasks: implications for cortical motor organization. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25:345-352.
60. Brodal A. Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 1973; 96:675-694.
61. Doyon J, Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15:161-167.
62. Lehericy S, Benali H, Van de Moortele PF, et al. Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:12566-12571. Normal individuals who were trained in sequences and activation over a 1-month period were measured with fMRI. Motor representation for the learned sequence shifted from associative to sensorimotor territories of the striato-pallidal complex.
63. Hummel F, Gerloff C. Larger interregional synchrony is associated with greater behavioral success in a complex sensory integration task in humans. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:670-678. EEG was used to show that in a visuotactile integration task, successful learning correlates with an increase in coherence between signals from visual and sensorimotor cortex.
64. Strens LH, Asselman P, Pogosyan A, et al. Corticocortical coupling in chronic stroke: its relevance to recovery. Neurology 2004; 63:475-484. Recovery correlates with an increase in task-related coupling between cortical areas, measured with EEG. This method is probably more suitable than fMRI to analyse how participating areas communicate with each other and can also be used to demonstrate the functionality of these areas.
65. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3:228-236.
66. Reddy H, De Stefano N, Mortilla M, et al. Functional reorganization of motor cortex increases with greater axonal injury from CADASIL. Stroke 2002; 33:502-508.
67. Buhmann C, Binkofski F, Klein C, et al. Motor reorganization in asymptomatic carriers of a single mutant Parkin allele: a human model for presymptomatic parkinsonism. Brain 2005; 128 (Pt 10):2281-2290. Asymptomatic carriers of a mutation of a Parkin gene can have 'silent' reorganization of the sensorimotor system, possibly to prevent an early clinical manifestation.
68. Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65:466-468. Repetitive TMS over the motor cortex improved performance in a group of 26 patients with acute stroke.
69. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005; 128 (Pt 3):490-499. Transcranial direct stimulation of the motor cortex improved performance in a group of patients with chronic stroke.
70. Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with non-invasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19:14-19.
71. Brown JA, Lutsep H, Cramer SC, Weinand M. Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: case report. Neurol Res 2003; 25:815-818.
72. Haas S, Weidner N, Winkler J. Adult stem cell therapy in stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2005; 18:59-64.
73. Platz T, van Kaick S, Moller L, et al. Impairment-oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study. J Neurol 2005; 24 June [Epub ahead of print].
74. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, et al. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1106-1111.
75. Bolton DA, Cauraugh JH, Hausenblas HA. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2004; 223:121-127.
76. Popovic DB, Popovic MB, Sinkjaer T, et al. Therapy of paretic arm in hemiplegic subjects augmented with a neural prosthesis: a cross-over study. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004; 82:749-756.
77. Baker JT, Donoghue JP, Sanes JN. Gaze direction modulates finger movement activation patterns in human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 1999; 19:10044-10052.
78. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1076-1083.
79. Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21:124-131.
80. Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol 2005; 75:309-320.
81. Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training, and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292:1853-1861.
82. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 2005; 163:118-122.
83. Pomeroy VM, Clark CA, Miller JS, et al. The potential for utilizing the 'mirror neurone system' to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19:4-13.
84. Celnik P, Stefan K, Hummel F, et al. Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage 2005; 23 August [Epub ahead of print].
85. Cicinelli P, Marconi B, Zaccagnini M, et al. Imagery-induced cortical excitability changes in stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 2005; 4 May [Epub ahead of print].
86. Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui-Chan CW. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1403-1408.
87. Floel A, Hummel F, Breitenstein C, et al. Dopaminergic effects on encoding of a motor memory in chronic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65:472-474.
88. Martinsson L, Eksborg S. Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines. Drugs Aging 2004; 21:67-79.
89. Feeney DM, De Smet AM, Rai S. Noradrenergic modulation of hemiplegia: facilitation and maintenance of recovery. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22:175-190.
90. Luria A. The working brain: an introduction to neuropsychology. London: Penguin; 1973.
91. Rijntjes M, Dettmers C, Buchel C, et al. A blueprint for movement: functional and anatomical representations in the human motor system. J Neurosci 1999; 19:8043-8048.
92. Rickert J, Oliveira SC, Vaadia E, et al. Encoding of movement direction in different frequency ranges of motor cortical local field potentials. J Neurosci 2005; 25:8815-8824. Local field potentials in monkey motor cortex can be used to decode movement parameters.
93. Weiss EJ, Flanders M. Muscular and postural synergies of the human hand. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92:523-535. From a principal component analysis of motor units measured with EMG during different hand positions, it is possible to infer that the motor cortex has a distributed representation of muscle synergies.
94. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22:281-299.
95. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, et al. Submovements grow larger, fewer, and more blended during stroke recovery. Motor Control 2004; 8:472-483. The number of submovements after motor stroke decreases, while they increase in peak speed and duration, suggesting that they are incorporated in goal-directed movements and therefore reflect functional reorganization.
96. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, et al. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2003; 107:369-381.
97. Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2004; 157:162-173. During goal-directed prehension tasks, motor stroke patients use the trunk as an additional degree of freedom.
98. Spinazzola L, Cubelli R, Della Sala S. Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions: dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability. Brain 2003; 126 (Pt 12):2656-2666.
99. Page SJ, Gater DR, Bach YRP. Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1377-1381.
100. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18:833-862.
101. Rijntjes M, Hobbeling V, Hamzei F, et al. Individual factors in constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19:238-249.
102. Dahlqvist P, Ronnback A, Bergstrom SA, et al. Environmental enrichment reverses learning impairment in the Morris water maze after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19:2288-2298.
103. Komitova M, Mattsson B, Johansson BB, Eriksson PS. Enriched environment increases neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of stroke-lesioned adult rats. Stroke 2005; 36:1278-1282.
104. Ronnback A, Dahlqvist P, Svensson PA, et al. Gene expression profiling of the rat hippocampus one month after focal cerebral ischemia followed by enriched environment. Neurosci Lett 2005; 385:173-178.
105. Khan F. Poststroke depression. Aust Fam Physician 2004; 33:831-834.
106. Nannetti L, Paci M, Pasquini J, et al. Motor and functional recovery in patients with post-stroke depression. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27:170-175.
107. Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24:1245-1254.
108. van der Lee JH. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14:741-744.
109. Fritz SL, Light KE, Patterson TS, et al. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36:1172-1177.