Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 145-160

  Collinger, Jennifer L ^a,b,c   Boninger, Michael L ^a,b,c,d   Bruns, Tim M ^b   Curley, Kenneth ^e   Wang, Wei ^b,c   Weber, Douglas J ^a,b,c,d  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^e U S ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND MATERIEL COMMAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Brain computer interface; Disability; Function; Functional electrical stimulation; Neuroprosthetics; Priorities; Quality of life; Spinal cord injury; Veterans

Indexed keywords

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRI-CAL STIMULATIONS; NEUROPROSTHETICS; PRIORITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES (SCI); VETERANS;

DESIGN; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FUNCTIONS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); QUALITY CONTROL; RESTORATION; TECHNOLOGY;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BLADDER FUNCTION; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CHRONIC PAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND FUNCTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PARAPLEGIA; PATHOLOGICAL REFLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRIPLEGIA; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK REDUCTION; SENSATION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TRAINING; VETERAN; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARM; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HAND; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PARAPLEGIA; QUADRIPLEGIA; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE; VETERANS; WALKING;

EID: 84876859606     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.11.0213     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Tate D, Dijkers M, Gordon W, Shewchuk R, DeVivo MJ. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1501-6. [PMID:10569447] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90264-2
2. Sharma V, Simpson RC, LoPresti EF, Mostowy C, Olson J, Puhlman J, Hayashi S, Cooper RA, Konarski E, Kerley B. Participatory design in the development of the wheelchair convoy system. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008;5:1. [PMID:18171465] http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-1
3. Liu H, Grindle G, Chuang F, Kelleher A, Cooper R, Sieworek D, Smailagic A, Cooper RA. A survey of feedback modalities for wheelchair power seat functions. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2012;11(3):54-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2011.20
4. Anderson KD. Consideration of user priorities when developing neural prosthetics. J Neural Eng. 2009;6(5):055003. [PMID:19721182] http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/6/5/055003
5. Sanders PM, Ijzerman MJ, Roach MJ, Gustafson KJ. Patient preferences for next generation neural prostheses to restore bladder function. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(1):113-19. [PMID:20531360] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.65
6. Martin JK, Martin LG, Stumbo NJ, Morrill JH. The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011; 6(3):225-42. [PMID:20929425] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.522685
7. Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29(9):536-46. [PMID:16859758] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004
8. Schwartz AB, Cui XT, Weber DJ, Moran DW. Braincontrolled interfaces: movement restoration with neural prosthetics. Neuron. 2006;52(1):205-20. [PMID:17015237] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.019
9. Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11):1032-43. [PMID:18835541] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0
10. Donoghue JP. Bridging the brain to the world: a perspective on neural interface systems. Neuron. 2008;60(3):511-21. [PMID:18995827] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.037
11. Wang W, Collinger JL, Perez MA, Tyler-Kabara EC, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N, Brose SW, Schwartz AB, Boninger ML, Weber DJ. Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(1):157-78. [PMID:19951784] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.003
12. Vargas-Irwin CE, Shakhnarovich G, Yadollahpour P, Mislow JM, Black MJ, Donoghue JP. Decoding complete reach and grasp actions from local primary motor cortex populations. J Neurosci. 2010;30(29):9659-69. [PMID:20660249] http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5443-09.2010
13. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science. 1986; 233(4771):1416-19. [PMID:3749885] http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3749885
14. Moran DW, Schwartz AB. Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 82(5):2676-92. [PMID:10561437]
15. Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science. 2002;296(5574): 1829-32. [PMID:12052948] http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1070291
16. Velliste M, Perel S, Spalding MC, Whitford AS, Schwartz AB. Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature. 2008;453(7198):1098-1101. [PMID:18509337] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06996
17. Serruya MD, Hatsopoulos NG, Paninski L, Fellows MR, Donoghue JP. Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature. 2002;416(6877):141-42. [PMID:11894084] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416141a
18. Sellers EW, Donchin EA. A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(3):538-48. [PMID:16461003] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027
19. McFarland DJ, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR. Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement. J Neural Eng. 2010;7(3):036007. [PMID:20460690] http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007
20. Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, Kubler A. The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci. 2010;4:55. [PMID:20700521] http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00055
21. Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Wolpaw JR, Ojemann JG, Moran DW. A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng. 2004;1(2):63-71. [PMID:15876624] http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/001
22. Schalk G, Miller KJ, Anderson NR, Wilson JA, Smyth MD, Ojemann JG, Moran DW, Wolpaw JR, Leuthardt EC. Twodimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng. 2008;5(1):75-84. [PMID:18310813] http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/008
23. Blakely T, Miller KJ, Zanos SP, Rao RP, Ojemann JG. Robust, long-term control of an electrocorticographic braincomputer interface with fixed parameters. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(1):E13. [PMID:19569888] http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0977
24. Vinjamuri R, Weber DJ, Mao ZH, Collinger JL, Degenhart AD, Kelly JW, Boninger ML, Tyler-Kabara EC, Wang W. Toward synergy-based brain-machine interfaces. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2011;15(5):726-36. [PMID:21708506] http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2011.2160272
25. Wang W, Collinger JL, Degenhart AD, Tyler-Kabara EC, Schwartz AB, Moran DW, Weber DJ, Wodlinger B, Vinjamuri RK, Ashmore RC, Kelly JW, Boninger ML. An electrocorticographic brain interface in an individual with tetraplegia. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55344. Epub 2013 Feb 6. [PMID:23405137]
26. Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006;442(7099):164-71. [PMID:16838014] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04970
27. Simeral JD, Kim SP, Black MJ, Donoghue JP, Hochberg LR. Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2): [PMID:21436513] http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025027
28. Kennedy PR, Bakay RA. Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection. Neuroreport. 1998;9(8):1707-11. [PMID:9665587] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199806010-00007
29. Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Wang W, TylerKabara EC, Weber DJ, McMorland AJ, Velliste M, Boninger ML, Schwartz AB. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. Epub 2012 Dec 13. [PMID:23253623] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61816-9
30. Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012; 485(7398):372-75. [PMID:22596161] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11076
31. Curt A, Bruehlmeier M, Leenders KL, Roelcke U, Dietz V. Differential effect of spinal cord injury and functional impairment on human brain activation. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19(1):43-51. [PMID:11852977] http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/089771502753460222
32. Hotz-Boendermaker S, Funk M, Summers P, Brugger P, Hepp-Reymond MC, Curt A, Kollias SS. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage. 2008;39(1): 383-94. [PMID:17919932] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.065
33. Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord. 2006; 44(2):95-105. [PMID:16130026] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101787
34. Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004; 19(2):91-101. [PMID:15201468]
35. Barker RN, Kendall MD, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ, Haines TP, Kuipers P. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(2):149-55. [PMID:18594553] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.82
36. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(12 Suppl 2):S18-25. [PMID:12474168] http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.36835
37. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10): 1371-83. [PMID:15672628] http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371
38. Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, BieringSorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(9):526-32. [PMID:15224087] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101638
39. Huggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011;12(5):318-24. [PMID:21534845] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.572978
40. Kilgore KL, Scherer M, Bobblitt R, Dettloff J, Dombrowski DM, Godbold N, Jatich JW, Morris R, Penko JS, Schremp ES, Cash LA. Neuroprosthesis consumers' forum: consumer priorities for research directions. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(6):655-60. [PMID:11767973]
41. Brown-Triolo DL, Roach MJ, Nelson K, Triolo RJ. Consumer perspectives on mobility: implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(6):659-69. [PMID:17943668]
42. QUERI. Spinal cord injury fact sheet [Internet]. Washington (DC): VA Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service; 2009 [updated 2012 Apr; cited 2010 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.queri.research.va.gov/about/factsheets/ sci_factsheet.pdf
43. NSCISC National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. National Spinal Cord Injury Database [Internet]. Birmingham (AL): National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center; 2011 [cited 2010 May 1]. Available from: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/nscisc-database.aspx
44. Grey N, Kennedy P. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative study of clinician and self ratings. Paraplegia. 1993;31(7):457-61. [PMID:8371936] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.74
45. Masedo AI, Hanley M, Jensen MP, Ehde D, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of a self-report FIM (FIM-SR) in persons with amputation or spinal cord injury and chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):167-76, quiz 177-79, 198. [PMID:15725790]
46. Abma TA. Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(10):1310-28. [PMID:16263914] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305282382
47. Hammell KR. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation research: patient priorities, current deficiencies and potential directions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1209-18. [PMID:20131945] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638280903420325
48. DeVivo MJ, Chen Y. Trends in new injuries, prevalent cases, and aging with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):332-38. [PMID:21353817] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.031
49. Peckham PH, Keith MW, Kilgore KL, Grill JH, Wuolle KS, Thrope GB, Gorman P, Hobby J, Mulcahey MJ, Carroll S, Hentz VR, Wiegner A; Implantable Neuroprosthesis Research Group. Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(10):1380-88. [PMID:11588741] http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.25910
50. Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(11):1433-39. [PMID:9821906] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90240-4
51. Patil PG, Turner DA. The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices. Neurotherapeutics. 2008; 5(1):137-46. [PMID:18164493] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2007.11.002
52. Gilja V, Chestek CA, Diester I, Henderson JM, Deisseroth K, Shenoy KV. Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(7):1891-99. [PMID:21257365] http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2107553
53. Prochazka A, Gauthier M, Wieler M, Kenwell Z. The bionic glove: an electrical stimulator garment that provides controlled grasp and hand opening in quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):608-14. [PMID:9196468] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90426-3
54. Popovic MR, Popovic DB, Keller T. Neuroprostheses for grasping. Neurol Res. 2002;24(5):443-52. [PMID:12117312] http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/016164102101200311
55. Brose SW, Weber DJ, Salatin BA, Grindle GG, Wang H, Vazquez JJ, Cooper RA. The role of assistive robotics in the lives of persons with disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(6):509-21. [PMID:20134305] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf569b
56. Harris A, Katyal K, Para M, Thomas J, editors. Revolutionizing prosthetics software technology. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; 2011 Oct 9-12; Anchorage, AK.
57. Gater DR Jr, Dolbow D, Tsui B, Gorgey AS. Functional electrical stimulation therapies after spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(3):231-48. [PMID:21558629]
58. Cooper RA, Cooper R. Quality-of-life technology for people with spinal cord injuries. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(1):1-13. [PMID:19951774] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.004