What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 318-324

  Huggins, Jane E ^a   Wren, Patricia A ^b   Gruis, Kirsten L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface (BCI); Performance criteria; Standards

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; TELECONSULTATION;

AGED; AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REACTION TIME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80053953056     PISSN: 17482968     EISSN: 1471180X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17482968.2011.572978     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Happ MB. Interpretation of non-vocal behavior and the meaning of voicelessness in critical care. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;50:1247-55. (Pubitemid 30084747)
2. Ball L, Nordness A, Fager S, Kersch K, Mohr B, Pattee G. Eye-gaze access to AAC technology for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 2010;18:11-23.
3. Kennedy PR, Bakay RA, Moore MM, Adams K, Goldwaithe J. Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8:198-202. (Pubitemid 30437013)
4. Nijboer F, Sellers EW, Mellinger J, Jordan MA, Matuz T, Furdea A, et al. A P300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008;119:1909-16.
5. Kubler A, Furdea A, Halder S, Hammer EM, Nijboer F, Kotchoubey B. A brain-computer interface controlled auditory event-related potential (p300) spelling system for locked-in patients. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2009;1157:90-100.
6. Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Neat GW, Forneris CA. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;78:252-9.
7. Kim SP, Simeral JD, Hochberg LR, Donoghue JP, Black MJ. Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia. J Neural Eng. 2008;5:455-76.
8. Schalk G, Kubanek J, Miller KJ, Anderson NR, Leuthardt EC, Ojemann JG, et al. Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng. 2007;4:264-75.
9. Cincotti F, Mattia D, Aloise F, Bufalari S, Schalk G, Oriolo G, et al. Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology. Brain Research Bulletin. 2008;75:796-803.
10. Xiaorong G, Dingfeng X, Ming C, Shangkai G. A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2003;11:137-40.
11. Sellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11:449-55.
12. Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1996;18:439-48. (Pubitemid 26315692)
13. Scherer MJ, McKee B. High-tech communication devices: what separates users from non-users? Augmentative & Alternative Communication. 1990;6:99.
14. Scherer MJ. Living in the State of Stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books; 1993.
15. P hillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology. 1993;5:36-45.
16. Neumann N, Kubler A. Training locked-in patients: a challenge for the use of brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11:169-72. (Pubitemid 36935050)
17. Preiser WFE, Ostroff E. Universal Design Handbook. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
18. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21: 1371-83. (Pubitemid 39435314)
19. Gruis KL, Wren PA, Huggins JE. ALS patients' self-reported satisfaction with assistive technology. Muscle and Nerve. 2011 Apr 1. doi: 10.1002/mus.21951. [Epub ahead of print]
20. Kaufmann P, Levy G, Montes J, Buchsbaum R, Barsdorf AI, Battista V, et al. Excellent inter-rater, intra-rater, and telephone-administered reliability of the ALSFRS-R in a multicenter clinical trial. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2007;8: 42-6. (Pubitemid 46322939)
21. Peterson W. Role of persons with a disability in the design process. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2008;15:87-96. (Pubitemid 351631452)
22. Schreuder M, Blankertz B, Tangermann M. A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: spatial hearing as an information cue. PloS One. 2010;5:9813.
23. Ives JR. New chronic EEG electrode for critical/intensive care unit monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22: 119-23. (Pubitemid 40490403)
24. Drury I, Schuh L, Ross D, Pennell P, Varma N, Henry T. Ictal patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy recorded by epidural screw electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;102:167-74. (Pubitemid 27165384)
25. Phukan J, Pender NP, Hardiman O. Cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6: 994-1003. (Pubitemid 47562321)
26. Smyth A, Riedl M, Kimura R, Olick R, Siegler M. End-oflife decisions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-cultural perspective. J Neurol Sci. 1997;152(Suppl 1):S93-6. (Pubitemid 27505299)
27. Guger C, Daban S, Sellers E, Holzner C, Krausz G, Carabalona R, et al. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci Lett. 2009;462:94-8.
28. Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;70:510-23.
29. Sellers EW, Donchin E. A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2006;117:538-48. (Pubitemid 43343986)
30. Piccione F, Giorgi F, Tonin P, Priftis K, Giove S, Silvoni S, et al. P300-based brain-computer interface: reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:531-7. (Pubitemid 43343985)
31. Furdea A, Halder S, Krusienski DJ, Bross D, Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, et al. An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. Psychophysiology. 2009;46:617-25.
32. Townsend G, LaPallo BK, Boulay CB, Krusienski DJ, Frye GE, Hauser CK, et al. A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121: 1109-20.
33. Donchin E, Spencer KM, Wijesinghe R. The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8:174-9. (Pubitemid 30437006)
34. McFarland DJ, Sarnacki WA, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116:56-62. (Pubitemid 40260421)
35. McFarland DJ, Krusienski DJ, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR. Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng. 2008;5: 101-10. (Pubitemid 351999178)
36. Blankertz B, Losch F, Krauledat M, Dornhege G, Curio G, Muller KR. The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: accurate performance from fi rst session in BCI-naive subjects. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:2452-62.