Genetic drift in antagonistic genes leads to divergence in sex-specific fitness between experimental populations of drosophila melanogaster

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1503-1510

  Hesketh, Jack ^a   Fowler, Kevin ^a   Reuter, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drift; Experimental evolution; Sexual antagonism; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANTAGONISM; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETICS; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC FITNESS; MALE; POPULATION; SEX FACTORS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84876840930     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12032     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbott, J. K., and E. H. Morrow. 2011. Obtaining snapshots of genetic variation using hemiclonal analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:359-368.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Balloux, F., and L. Lehmann. 2003. Random mating with a finite number of matings. Genetics 165:2313-2315.
4. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
5. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1671-1675.
6. Connallon, T., and A. Clark. 2012. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation. Genetics 190:1477-1489.
7. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark. 2011. The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication. Genetics 187:919-937.
8. Crawley, M. J. 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-PLUS. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
9. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
10. Delph, L. F., J. Andicoechea, J. C. Steven, C. R. Herlihy, S. V. Scarpino, and D. L. Bell. 2011. Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict in a dioecious plant. New Phytol. 192:542-552.
11. Foerster, K., T. Coulson, B. C. Sheldon, J. M. Pemberton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation in red deer. Nature 447:1107-1111.
12. Fry, J. D. 2010. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64:1510-1516.
13. Gavrilets, S., and W. R. Rice. 2006. Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:3031-3038.
14. Kidwell, J. F., M. T. Clegg, F. M. Stewart, and T. Prout. 1977. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in 2 sexes under random mating. Genetics 85:171-183.
15. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
16. Mainguy, J., S. D. Cote, M. Festa-Bianchet, and D. W. Coltman. 2009. Father-offspring phenotypic correlations suggest intralocus sexual conflict for a fitness-linked trait in a wild sexually dimorphic mammal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:4067-4075.
17. Mallet, M. A., and A. K. Chippindale. 2011. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females. Heredity 106:994-1002.
18. Mank, J. E., L. Hultin-Rosenberg, M. Zwahlen, and H. Ellegren. 2008. Pleiotropic constraint hampers the resolution of sexual antagonism in vertebrate gene expression. Am. Nat. 171:35-43.
19. Patten, M. M., D. Haig, and F. Ubeda. 2010. Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium. Evolution 64:3638-3642.
20. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
21. Reuter, M., J. R. Linklater, L. Lehmann, K. Fowler, T. Chapman, and G. D. D. Hurst. 2008. Adaptation to experimental alterations of the operational sex ratio in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62:401-412.
22. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex-chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
23. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
24. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14:685-693.
25. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal. 2012. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01834.
26. Svensson, E. I., A. G. McAdam, and B. Sinervo. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict over immune defense, gender load, and sex-specific signaling in a natural lizard population. Evolution 63:3124-3135.