Institutional interaction: Ten years of scholarly development

Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 25-58

  Oberthür, Sebastian ^b   Gehring, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876730395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1983. The Unraveling of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement, 1981: An Examination of International Regime Change. International Organization 37 (4): 617-646.
2. Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13-24.
3. Andersen, Regine. 2002. The Time Dimension in International Regime Interplay. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3): 98-117.
4. Andersen, Regine. 2008. Governing Agrobiodiversity: Plant Genetics and Developing Countries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
5. Biermann, Frank. 2001. The Rising Tide of Green Unilateralism in World Trade Law: Options for Reconciling the Emerging North-South Conflict. Journal of World Trade 35 (3): 421-448.
6. Biermann, Frank, and Steffen Bauer, eds. 2005. A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for International Environmental Governance? Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
7. Biermann, Frank, and Rainer Brohm. 2005. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the United States: The Strategic Role of Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border. Climate Policy 4 (3): 289-302.
8. Boyle, Alan E. 1999. Problems of Compulsory Jurisdiction and the Settlement of Disputes Relating to Straddling Fish Stocks. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 14 (1): 1-26.
9. Brack, Duncan. 2002. Environmental Treaties and Trade: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System. In Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, 2nd ed., ed. Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers, 321-352. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
10. Brown Weiss, Edith. 1993. International Environmental Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order. Georgetown Law Journal 81 (3): 675-710.
11. Chambers, W. Bradnee, ed. 1998. Global Climate Governance: Inter-linkages between the Kyoto Protocol and Other Multilateral Regimes. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
12. Chambers, W. Bradnee, ed. 2001. Inter-linkages: The Kyoto Protocol and the International Trade and Investment Regimes. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
13. Chambers, W. Bradnee, and Jessica F. Green, eds. 2005. Reforming International Environmental Governance: From Institutional Limits to Innovative Reforms. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
14. Charnovitz, Steve. 1998. The World Trade Organization and the Environment. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 8: 98-116.
15. Charnovitz, Steve. 2003. Trade and Climate: Potential Conflict and Synergies. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
16. Clapp, Jennifer. 1994. Africa, NGOs, and the International Toxic Waste Trade. Journal of Environment & Development 2 (1): 17-46.
17. DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2005. Fishing under Flags of Convenience: Using Market Power to Increase Participation in International Regulation. Global Environmental Politics 5 (4): 73-94.
18. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2): 24-50.
19. Galaz, Victor, Per Olsson, Thomas Hahn, Carl Folke, and Uno Svedin. 2008. The Problem of Fit among Biophysical Systems, Environment and Resource Regimes, and Broader Governance Systems: Insights and Emerging Challenges. In Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, ed. Oran R. Young, Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder, 147-186. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
20. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberth ü r. 2004. Exploring Regime Interaction: A Framework of Analysis. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, ed. Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young, 247-269. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Academic.
21. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberth ü r. 2006. Comparative Empirical Analysis and Ideal Types of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 307-371. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberth ü r. 2008. Interplay: Exploring Institutional Interaction. In Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, ed. Oran R. Young, Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder, 187-223. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23. Gillespie, Alexander. 2002. Forum Shopping in International Environmental Law: The IWC, CITES, and the Management of Cetaceans. Ocean Development and International Law 33 (1): 17-56.
24. Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
25. Héritier, Adrienne. 1999. Policy-making and Diversity in Europe: Escaping Deadlock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Herr, Richard A., and Edmund Chia. 1995. The Concept of Regime Overlap: Toward Identification and Assessment. In Overlapping Maritime Regimes: An Initial Reconnaissance, ed. Bruce W. Davis, 11-26. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia: Antarctic CRC and Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies.
27. International Maritime Organization. 2006. New International Rules to Allow Storage of CO 2 in Seabed Adopted. IMO Press Briefing 43/2006, November 8. London: International Maritime Organization.
28. Jacquemont, Frédéric, and Alejandro Caparrós. 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years after Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 11 (2): 139-180.
29. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
30. Keohane, Robert O. 1993. The Analysis of International Regimes: Towards a European-American Research Programme. In Regime Theory and International Relations, ed. Volker Rittberger, 23-45. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Keohane, Robert O., Peter M. Haas, and Marc A. Levy. 1993. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions. In Institutions for the Earth, ed. Peter M. Haas, Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, 3-24. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
32. Keohane, Robert O., and David G. Victor. 2010. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Discussion Paper 10-33 (January 2010). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
33. King, Leslie A. 1997. Institutional Interplay: Research Questions. Background paper prepared for the IDGEC project. School of Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington.
34. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4): 761-799.
35. Lanchbery, John. 2006. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): Responding to Calls for Action from Other Nature Conservation Regimes. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 157-179. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36. Lavranos, Nikolaos. 2006. The MOX Plant and Ijzeren Rijn Disputes: Which Court Is the Supreme Arbiter? Leiden Journal of International Law 19 (1): 223-246.
37. Martin, Lisa L. 1993. The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism. In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, ed. John G. Ruggie, 91-121. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Meinke, Britta. 2002. Multi-Regime-Regulierung: Wechselwirkungen zwischen globalen und regionalen Umweltregimen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts- Verlag.
39. Miles, Edward. L., Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, Jørgen Wettestad, Jon Birger Skjærseth, and Elaine M. Carlin, eds. 2002. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
40. Najam, Adil, Mihaela Papa, and Nadaa Taiyab. 2006. Global Environmental Governance: A Reform Agenda. Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
41. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2001. Linkages between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols: Enhancing Synergies between Protecting the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate.
42. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2002. Clustering of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Potentials and Limitations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2 (4): 317-340.
43. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2003. Institutional Interaction to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Transport: ICAO, IMO and the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy 3 (3): 191-205.
44. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2006. The Climate Change Regime: Interactions with ICAO, IMO, and the EU Burden-Sharing Agreement. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 53-77. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
45. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Hermann E. Ott. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
46. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006a. Conceptual Foundations of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring, 19-51. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
47. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006b. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics 6 (2): 1-31.
48. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring, eds. 2006c. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
49. Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 38 (1): 1-24.
50. Palmer, Alice, Beatrice Chaytor, and Jacob Werksman. 2006. Interaction between the World Trade Organization and International Environmental Regimes. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 181-204. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
51. Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Pontecorvo, Concetta M. 1999. Interdependence between Global Environmental Regimes: The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and Forest Protection.
53. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 55: 277-309.
54. Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
55. Rosendal, Kristin. 2001. Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity. Global Governance 7 (1): 95-117.
56. Rosendal, Kristin. 2006. The Convention on Biological Diversity: Tensions with the WTO TRIPS Agreement over Access to Genetic Resources and the Sharing of Benefits. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 79-102. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
57. Schiffman, Howard. 1999. The Southern Bluefin Tuna Case: ITLOS Hears Its First Fishery Dispute. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 2 (3): 1-15.
58. Selin, Henrik, and Stacey D. VanDeveer. 2003. Mapping Institutional Linkages in European Air Pollution Politics. Global Environmental Politics 3 (3): 14-46.
59. Shany, Yuval. 2003. The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Simon, Herbert A. 1972. Theories of Bounded Rationality. In Decision and Organization, ed. Charles B. McGuire and Roy Radner, 161-176. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
61. Skjærseth, Jon Birger. 2000. North Sea Cooperation: Linking International and Domestic Pollution Control. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
62. Skjærseth, Jon Birger. 2006. Protecting the Northeast Atlantic: One Problem, Three Institutions. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 102-125. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
63. Skjærseth, Jon Birger, Olav Schram Stokke, and Jørgen Wettestad. 2006. Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms. Global Environmental Politics 6 (3): 104-120.
64. Snidal, Duncan. 1985. The Game Theory of International Politics. World Politics 38 (1): 25-57.
65. Snidal, Duncan. 1994. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity and Institutions. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (4): 449-472.
66. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2000. Managing Straddling Stocks: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes. Ocean and Coastal Management 43 (2/3): 205-234.
67. Stokke, Olav Schram, ed. 2001a. Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2001b. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. Report No. 14. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
69. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2007. A Legal Regime for the Arctic? Interplay with the Law of the Sea Convention. Marine Policy 31 (4): 402-408.
70. Stokke, Olav Schram, and Claire Coffey. 2006. Institutional Interplay and Responsible Fisheries: Combating Subsidies, Developing Precaution. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 127-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
71. Stokke, Olav Schram, and Davor Vidas. 1996. Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Stokke, Olav Schram, and Geir H ø nneland, eds. 2007. International Cooperation and Arctic Governance: Regime Effectiveness and Northern Region Building . London: Routledge.
73. Tarasofsky, Richard G. 1997. Ensuring Compatibility between Multilateral Environmental Agreements and GATT/WTO. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 7: 52-74.
74. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahnemann. 1981. The Framing of Decision and Rational Choice. Science 211: 453-458.
75. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahnemann. 1984. Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341-350.
76. Underdal, Arild. 2004. Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness . In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, ed. Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young, 27-48. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
77. Underdal, Arild. 2008. Determining the Causal Significance of Institutions: Accomplishments and Challenges. In Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, ed. Oran R. Young, Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder, 49-78. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
78. Underdal, Arild, and Oran R. Young, eds. 2004. Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Academic.
79. van Asselt, Harro, Frank Biermann, and Joyeeta Gupta. 2004. Interlinkages of Global Climate Governance. In Beyond Climate: Options for Broadening Climate Policy, ed. Marcel Kok and Heleen de Coninck, 221-246. Netherlands Research Programme on Climate Change, Report 500036001. Bilthoven: RIVM.
80. van Asselt, Harro, Francesco Sindico, and Michael A. Mehling. 2008. Global Climate Change and the Fragmentation of International Law. Law & Policy 30 (4): 423-449.
81. Vidas, Davor. 2000a. Emerging Law of the Sea Issues in the Antarctic Maritime Area: A Heritage for the New Century? Ocean Development and International Law 31 (1/2): 197-222.
82. Vidas, Davor, ed. 2000b. Protecting the Polar Marine Environment: Law and Policy for Pollution Prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. von Moltke, Konrad. 2005. Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organization. In A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance?, ed. Frank Biermann and Steffen Bauer, 175-204. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
84. Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (3): 335-370.
85. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, and Nele Matz. 2003. Conflicts in International Environmental Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
86. Yamin, Farhana, and Joanna Depledge. 2004. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Young, Oran R. 1982. Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 277-297.
88. Young, Oran R. 1996. Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 1-24.
89. Young, Oran R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
90. Young, Oran R. 2008. Deriving Insights from the Case of the WTO and the Cartagena Protocol. In Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade, ed. Oran R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, 131-158. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
91. Young, Oran R., with contributions from Arun Agrawal, Leslie A. King, Peter H. Sand, Arild Underdal, and Merrilyn Wasson. 1999/2005. Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan. IHDP Report Nos. 9 and 16. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.
92. Young, Oran R., W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, eds. 2008. Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.