The southern Bluefin tuna case: Itlos hears its first fishery dispute

Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 318-333

  Schiffman, Howard S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Australia; Bluefin Tuna; Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna; Dispute setdement; Japan; New Zealand; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894732589     PISSN: 13880292     EISSN: 15481476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13880299909353936     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Schiffman, Howard S., 1998. The Dispute Settlement Mechanism of UNCLOS:A Potentially Important Framework fir Marine Wildlife Management. J. Int'l Wildlife Law & Pol'y, 1:293
2. Merrills, J.G., 1998. International Dispute Settlement, 3d ed. 170–196.
3. ()
4. ()
5. Hook. February 1997. Line and Sinking:The Crisis in Marine Fisheries, February, Report of the National Resources Defense Council.
6. Parfit, Michael. 1995. Diminishing Returns:Exploiting the Oceans Bounty. Nat'l Geographic, Nov.:2
7. ()
8. Bergin, Anthony, and Haward, Marcus. 1996. Japan's Tuna Fishing Industry:A Setting Sun or New Dawn?.:133
9. Tsukiji. 1995. The Great Tokyo Fish Market. Nat'l Geographic, Nov.:41
10. CCSBT. 1997. Report of the 1997 Scientific Committee Meeting. July281997, Canberra. -Aug 8
11. ()
12. International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna, May 14, 1966. U.S.T., 202887
13. DeLone, Elizabeth. 1998. Improving the Management of the Atlantic Tuna:The Duty to Strengthen the ICCAT in Light of the 1995 Straddling Stocks Treaty. N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J., 6:656
14. Mack, Julie R., 1996. International Fisheries Management:How the U.N. Conference on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Changes the Law of Fishing on the High Seas. Cal. W. Int'l L.J., 26:313326–328.
15. CCSBT. 1999. Report of the Fifth Annual Meeting, Second Part. May101999, Tokyo. -13
16. ()
17. ()
18. Gutreuter, Julia E., 1999. Quota Allocation Methods in the Management of International Marine Fisheries Future Implications. TUL. ENVTL. LJ., 12:479
19. CCSBT. 1998. Report of the Fourth Annual Meeting, Second Part. Jan.19–221998, Canberra.
20. ()
21. ()
22. ()
23. ()
24. ()
25. ()
26. ()
27. ()
28. ()
29. ()
30. ()
31. ()
32. ()
33. 1999. American Society of International Law. August 30-Sept. 3
34. ()
35. ()
36. ()
37. ()
38. ()
39. Oxman, Bernard H., 1987. “ Jurisdiction and the Power to Indicate Provisional Measures ”. In The International Court of Justice At A Crossroads Edited by:Damrosch, Lori F., 323
40. Henkin, Louis. 1998. AGORA Breard, Provisional Measures, U.S. Treaty Obligations, and the States. Am. J. Int'l L., 92:679