Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: The case of the cartagena protocol and the World Trade Organization

Global Environmental Politics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 1-31

  Oberthür, Sebastian ^a   Gehring, Thomas ^b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; POWER RELATIONS; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 33748749598     PISSN: 15263800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.2.1     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Adler, Jonathan H. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol and Biological Diversity: Biosafe or Bio-Sorry. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 12 (3): 761-777.
2. Alfonso, Margarida. 2002: The Relationship with Other International Agreements: An EU Perspective. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 423-437. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
3. Andersen, Regine. 2002. The Time Dimension in International Regime Interplay. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3): 98-117.
4. Araya, Mónica. 2001. Environmental Dilemmas on the Road to Doha: Winning Southern Support for Greening the WTO. In Trade and Environment, the WTO, and Multilateral Environmental Agreements, edited by Liane Schalatek, 109-118. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, Heinreich Böll Foundation & the National Wildlife Federation.
5. Archer, Margaret S. 1985. Structuration versus Morphogenesis. In Vol. 1 of Macro-Sociological Theory. Perspectives on Sociological Theory, edited by S.N. Eisenstadt and H.J. Helle, 58-88. London: Sage
6. Bail, Christoph, Robert Falkner, and Helen Marquard, eds. 2002. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? London: RIIA/Earthscan.
7. Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2004. GMOs and Trade: Issues at Stake in the EC Biotech Dispute. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 13 (3): 289-305.
8. Brack, Duncan. 2002. Environmental Treaties and Trade: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System. In Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, edited by Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradney Chambers, 321-352. Tokyo: UN University Press.
9. Breitmeier, Helmut. 2000. Complex Effectiveness, Regime Externalities and Interaction (Working Group III). In Proceedings of the 1999 Oslo Workshop of the Concerted Action Network on the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes, edited by Jorgen Wettestad, 45-48. Oslo: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
10. Brunnée, Jutta. 2004. The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant. European Journal of International Law 15 (4): 617-649.
11. Burgiel, Stanley W. 2002. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Taking the Steps from Negotiation to Implementation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11(1): 53-61.
12. Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. The Agent-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 245-270.
13. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2004. Procedures and Mechanisms on Compliance under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. In Report of the First Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol on Biosafety. UN doc. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/1/15, 14 April 2004, 65-68.
14. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50 (3): 324-348.
15. Clapp, Jennifer. 1994. Africa, NGOs, and the International Toxic Waste Trade. Journal of Environment and Development 3 (2): 17-46.
16. Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
17. Cottier, Thomas. 2002. Implications for Trade Law and Policy: Towards Convergence and Integration. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 467-481. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
18. Eggers, Barbara and Ruth Mackenzie. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Journal of International Economic Law 3 (3): 525-543.
19. Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Falkner, Robert. 2000. Regulating Biotech Trade: the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. International Affairs 76 (2): 299-313.
21. _. 2002. Negotiating the Biosafety Protocol. The International Process. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 3-22. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
22. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberthür. 2004. Exploring Regime Interaction: A Framework for Analysis. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young, 247-269. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. _. 2006. Comparative Empirical Analysis and Ideal Types of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 307-371. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. Gnath, Katharina. 2004. The WTO and Environment: ...More Words than Deeds? On the Relationship between the WTO and the Environment: Overview, Latest Developments and Assessment. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik (available at http://www.weltpolitik.net/Sachgebiete/ Weltwirtschaft%20und%20Globalisierung/Institutionen%20und%20Akteure/WTO/).
25. Graff, Laurence. 2002. The Precautionary Principle. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 410-422. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
26. Gupta, Aarti. 2001. Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis for Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 9 (1): 265-281.
27. _. Forthcoming. Global Biosafety Governance: Emergence and Evolution. In Institutional Interplay: The Case of Biosafety, edited by W. Bradnee Chambers and Joy A. Kim. Tokyo: UN University.
28. Haas, Peter M., Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, eds. 1993. Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29. Hedström, Peter, and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social Mechanisms. An Introductory Essay. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Peter Hedström and Richard Swedberg, 1-31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Héritier, Adrienne. 1996. The Accommodation of Diversity in the European Policymaking Process and its Outcomes. Regulatory Policy as a Patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy 3 (2): 149-167.
31. von Homeyer, Ingmar. 2006. The EU Deliberate Release Directive: Environmental Precaution versus Trade and Product Regulation. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 259-283. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32. Howse, Robert, and Joshua Meltzer. 2002. The Significance of the Protocol for WTO Dispute Settlement. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 482-496. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
33. Jacquemont, Frédéric, and Alejandro Caparrós. 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years after Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11 (2): 139-80.
34. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Lanchbery, John. 2006. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): Responding to Calls for Action from Other Nature Conservation Regimes. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 157-179. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36. Levy, Marc A., Oran R. Young, and Michael Zürn. 1995. The Study of International Regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1 (3): 267-330.
37. Mackenzie, Ruth. 2004. The Cartagena Protocol after the First Meeting of the Parties. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 13 (3): 270-278.
38. Martin, Lisa L. 1993. The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism. In Multilateralism Matters. The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, edited by John Ruggie, 91-121. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
39. Mattli, Walter. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power. World Politics 56 (1): 1-42.
40. Meinke, Britta. 2002. Multi-Regime-Regulierung. Wechselwirkungen zwischen globalen und regionalen Umweltregimen. Darmstadt: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
41. Miles, Edward L., Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, Jørgen Wettestad, Jon Birger Skjærseth, and Elaine M. Carlin. 2002. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2001. Linkages between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols: Enhancing Synergies between Protecting the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1 (3): 357-377.
43. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Hermann E. Ott (in collaboration with Richard G. Tarasofsky). 1999. The Kyoto Protocol. International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer.
44. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006a. Conceptual Foundations of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 19-51. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring, eds. 2006b. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46. Palmer, Alice, Beatrice Chaytor, and Jacob Werksman. 2006. Interactions between the World Trade Organisation and International Environmental Regimes. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 181-204. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Pythoud, Francois, and Urs P. Thomas. 2002. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. In Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, edited by Philippe G. Le Prestre, 39-56. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
48. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277-309.
49. Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. Ideas do not Float Freely. Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2): 185-214.
50. Risse, Thomas. 2000. Let's Argue!: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1-39.
51. Rivera-Torres, Olivette. 2003. The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 26 (2): 263-323.
52. Rosendal, G. Kristin. 2000. The Convention on Biological Diversity and Developing Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
53. _. 2001. Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity. Global Governance 7 (1): 95-117.
54. Safrin, Sabrina. 2002a. The Relationship with Other Agreements: Much Ado about a Savings Clause. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 3-22. London: RIIA/Earthscan
55. _. 2002b. Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements. American Journal of International Law 96 (3): 606-627.
56. Schelling, Thomas. 1998. Social Mechanisms and Social Dynamics. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Peter Hedström and Richard Swedberg, 32-44. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. nd edition, edited by Patricia Birnie and Alan Boyle, 697-750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Selin, Henrik, and Stacy D. VanDeveer. 2003. Mapping Institutional Linkages in European Air Pollution Politics. Global Environmental Politics 3 (3): 14-46.
59. Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Shaw, Sabina, and Risa Schwartz. 2002. Trade and Environment in the WTO: State of Play. Journal of World Trade 36 (1): 129-154.
61. Simon, Herbert A. 1972. Theories of Bounded Rationality. In Decision and Organization, edited by Charles B. McGuire and Roy Radner, 161-176. Amsterdam: North Holland.
62. Skjærseth, Jon Birger. 2006. Protecting the North-East Atlantic: One Problem, Three Institutions. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, edited by Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring. 103-125. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
63. Stein, Arthur. 1982. Coordination and Collaboration. Regimes in an Anarchic World. International Organization 36 (2): 299-324.
64. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2001a. Conclusions. In Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes, edited by Olav Schram Stokke, 329-60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. _. 2001b. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. FNI Report 14/2001. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
66. Stoll, Peter-Tobias. 2000. Controlling the Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 1999 (Vol. 10): 82-119.
67. Underdal, Arild. 2004. Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young, 27-48. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
68. Werksman, Jacob. 2005. The Negotiation of a Kyoto Compliance System. In Implementing the Climate Regime: International Compliance, edited by Olav Schram Stokke, Jon Hovi and Geir Ulfstein, 17-37. London: Earthscan.
69. Yee, Albert S. 1996. The Causal Effects of Ideas on Politics. International Organization 50 (1): 69-108.
70. Young, Oran R. 1992. The Effectiveness of International Institutions: Hard Cases and Critical Variables. In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, 160-194. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. _. 1996. Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 1-24.
72. _. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
73. Young, Oran R., ed. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioural Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Young, Oran R., Leslie A. King, Arun Aggarval, Arild Underdal, Peter H. Sand, and Merrilyn Wasson. 1999. Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC). Bonn: Science Plan.
75. Zedan, Hamdallah. 2002. The Road to the Biosafety Protocol. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 23-33. London: RIIA/Earthscan.