Unravelling the solvent flux behaviour of ceramic nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 439, Issue , 2013, Pages 36-47

  Buekenhoudt, A ^a   Bisignano, F ^b   De Luca, G ^b   Vandezande, P ^a   Wouters, M ^c,d   Verhulst, K ^c,d  

^a FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE ON MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

^c Karel de Grote Hogeschool Katholieke Hogeschool Antwerpen   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Hansen parameters; Modelling; Nanofiltration; Organic solvent

Indexed keywords

HANSEN PARAMETER; HANSEN SOLUBILITY PARAMETERS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION (OSN); PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SIMPLE LINEAR RELATIONSHIP; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; CLARIFICATION; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; PORE SIZE; SOLVENTS; SURFACES; ULTRAFILTRATION; VISCOSITY;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ACETONITRILE; ALCOHOL; BIOCERAMICS; ORGANIC SOLVENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; FLOW KINETICS; HYDROPHILICITY; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUBILITY; ULTRAFILTRATION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84876728984     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.032     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Nanofiltration-An Overview of Technology Development, Status and Trends, D16E, Frost & Sullivan, San Antonio, 2008.
2. S. Adler, E. Beaver, P. Bryan, S. Robinson, J. Watson, Vision 2020: 2000 Separations Roadmap, Centre for Waste Reduction Technology, AIChE, New York, 2000.
3. Machado D., Hasson D., Semiar R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes, part II: transport model. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166:63-69.
4. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., Bhattacharayya D. Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:1-21.
5. Silva P., Han S., Livingston A. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 262:49-59.
6. Geens J., Peeters K., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures: influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:255-264.
7. Geens J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:255-263.
8. Santos J., Hidalgo A., Oliveira R., Velizarov S., Crespo J. Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modelling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 300:191-204.
9. Darvishmanesh S., Buekenhoudt A., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. General model for prediction of solvent permeation through organic and inorganic solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 334:43-49.
10. Dobrak-Van Berlo A., Vankelecom I.F.J., Van der Bruggen B. Parameters determining transport mechanism through unfilled and silicalite filled PDMS-based membranes and dense PI membranes in solvent resistant nanofiltration: comparison with pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 374:138-149.
11. S. Zeidler, U. Kätzel, P. Kreis, Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a PDMS membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration, accepted for publication by J. Membr. Sci., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.056.
12. Hesse L., Sadowski G. Modelling liquid-liquid equilibriai of polyimide solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:539-546.
13. Guizard C., Amblard P. Current status and prospects for ceramic membrane applications. Handbook of Membrane Separations: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food and Biotechnological Applications 2008, 139-180. CRC Press. A.K. Pabby, S.S.H. Rizvi, A.M. Sastre (Eds.).
14. Tsuru T., Miyawaki M., Kondo H., Yoshioka T., Asaeda M. Inorganic porous membranes for nanofiltration of nonaqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 32:105-109.
15. Tsuru T., Kondo H., Yoshioka T., Asaeda M. Permeation of nonaqueous solution through organic/inorganic hybrid nanoporous membranes. AlChE J. 2004, 50:1080-1087.
16. Tsuru T., Narita M., Shinagawa R., Yoshioka T. Nanoporous titania membranes for permeation and filtration or organic solutions. Desalination 2008, 233:1-9.
17. Darvishmanesh S., Buekenhoudt A., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. Coupled series-parallel resistance model for transport of solvent through inorganic nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 70:46-52.
18. 2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346:344-362.
19. Marchetti P., Butté A., Livingston A.G. An improved model for prediction of solvent permeation through ceramic NF and UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:444-458.
20. Souvereyns B. Invloed van de interacties van solvent-opgeloste stof-membraanoppervlak op de performantie van keramische membranen in solventfiltratie, Mastersthesis, University of Antwerp 2009, Department of Chemistry.
21. Sol-Gel Science 1990, Academic Press Inc., San Diego. C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer (Eds.).
22. Poling E.B., Thomson H.G., Friend G.D., Rolwley L.R., Wilding W.V. Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, USA. eighth ed.
23. Barton A.F.M. Handbook of Solubility Parameters 1983, CRC Press, pp 153-157.
24. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Smith S.J., Na J.J.W. Nex experimental measurements of solvent induced swelling in naofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 261:129-135.
25. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A., Taylor M.L. The influence of polarity on flux and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration-experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:318-327.
26. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention or organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:29-41.
27. Iliyas A., Eic M., Zahedi-Niaki M.H., Vasenkov S. Toward observation of single-file diffusion using TZLC. Diffus. Fundam. 2007, 6:63.1-63.2.
28. Shao P., Huang R.Y.M. Polymeric membrane pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:162-179.
29. Bowen T.C., Kalipcilar H., Falconer J.L., Noble R.D. Pervaporation of organic/water mixtures through B-ZSM-5 zeolite membrane on monolith supports. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 215:235-247.
30. De Luca G., Donato L., García Del Blanco S., Tasselli F., Drioli E. On the cause of controlling affinity to small molecules of imprinted polymeric membranes prepared by noncovalent approach: a computational and experimental investigation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115:9345-9351.
31. T.P. Straatsma, E. Apra, T.L. Windus, M.E. Dupuis, J. Bylaska, W. de Jong, S. Hirata, D.M. Smith, A.M. Hackler, T.L. Pollack, R.J. Harrison, J. Nieplocha, V. Tipparaju, M. Krishnan, E. Brown, G. Cisneros, G.I. Fann, H. Fruchtl, J. Garza, K. Hirao, R. Kendall, J.A. Nichols, K. Tsemekhman, M. Valiev, K. Wolinski, J. Anchell, D. Bernholdt, P. Borowski, T. Clark,D. Clerc, H. Dachsel, M. Deegan, K. Dyall, D. Elwood, E. Glendening, M. Gutowski, A. Hess, J. Jaffe, B. Johnson, J. Ju, R. Kobayashi, R. Kutteh, Z. Lin, R. Littlefield, X. Long, B. Meng, T. Nakajima, S. Niu, M. Rosing, G. Sandrone, M. Stave, H. Taylor, G. Thomas, J. van Lenthe, A. Wong, Z. Zhang, NWChem, A Computational Chemistry Package for Parallel Computers, Version 6.0, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 2005.
32. Xu X., Zhang Q., Muller R.P., Goddard W.A. An extended hybrid density functional (X3LYP) with improved descriptions of nonbond interactions and thermodynamic properties of molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122:122. 014105.
33. D. Bertels, Solventgedrag van keramische nanofiltratie membranen, Mastersthesis, Katholieke Hogeschool Kempen, Department of Health and Chemistry, 2004.
34. Garcia A., Alvarez S., Riera F., Alvarez R., Coca J. Water and hexane permeate flux through organic and ceramic membranes. Effect of pretreatment on hexane permeate flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 253:139-147.
35. R. Vangeel, Solventgedrag van keramische nanofiltratie membrane, Masterthesis, Katholieke Hogeschool Kempen, Departement of Health and Chemistry, 2005.
36. Font J., Castro R.P., Cohen Y. On the loss of hydraulic permeability in ceramic membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 181:347-350.
37. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 224.
38. M. Wouters, Permeabiliteit van keramische membranen in solvent resistente nanofiltratie, Mastersthesis, Karel de Grote-Hogeschool, Departement of Chemistry, 2011.
39. Physical properties of glycerine and its solutions, http://www.aciscience.org/docs.
40. Guizard C., Ayral A., Julbe A. Potentiality of organic solvents filtration with ceramic membranes. A comparison with polymeric membranes. Desalination 2002, 147:275-280.
41. Reichardt C., Welton T. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry 2011, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim. fourth ed.
42. Koenhen D.M., Smolders C.A. The determination of solubility parameters of solvents and polymers by means of correlations with other physical quantities. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1975, 16:1163-1179.
43. Khattab I.S., Bandarkar F., Fakhree M.A.A., Jouyban A. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of water+ethanol mixture from 293 to 323K. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 29:812-817.
44. Del Carmen Grande M., Alvarez Juliá J., Barrero C.R., Marschoff C.M., Bianchi H.L. The (water+acetonitrile) mixture revisited: a new approach for calculating partial molar volumes. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2006, 38:760-768.
45. Aminabhavi T.M., Joshi S.S., Balundgi R.H., Shukla S.S. Densities and viscosities of binary and ternary liquid mixtures at 25°C. Can. J. Chem. 1991, 69:1028-1032.