Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modelling

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 300, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 191-204

  Santos, J L C ^a   Hidalgo, A M ^b   Oliveira, R ^a   Velizarov, S ^a   Crespo, J G ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); Chemometrics; Hybrid modelling; Projection to Latent Structures (PLS); Solution diffusion; Solvent nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; DIPOLE MOMENT; LATENT HEAT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEMBRANES; SOLVENTS; VISCOSITY;

CHEMOMETRICS; COMPREHENSIVE MODEL; HYBRID MODELLING; SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION;

NANOFILTRATION;

SOLVENT;

DIFFUSION; DIPOLE MOMENT; LATENT HEAT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; SOLVENTS; VISCOSITY;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; HYBRID; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 34547954142     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Paul D.R. Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 241 (2004) 371-386
2. Wijmans J.G., and Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 1-21
3. Silva P., Han S., and Livingston A.G. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 262 (2005) 49-59
4. Machado D.R., Hasson D., and Semiat R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part II. Transport model. J. Membr. Sci. 166 (2000) 63-69
5. Vankelecom I.F.J., De Smet K., Gevers L.E.M., Livingston A.G., Nair D., Aerts S., Kuypers S., and Jacobs P.A. Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solvents through dense silicone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 231 (2004) 99-108
6. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Millington C.R., and Nijmeijer A. Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 230 (2004) 29-37
7. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., and Bhattacharyya D. Performance of solven-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 189 (2001) 1-21
8. Stafie N., Stamatialis D.F., and Wessling M. Insight into the transport of hexane-solute systems through tailor-made composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 228 (2004) 103-116
9. Geens J., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 48 (2006) 255-263
10. Wold S., Sjostrom M., and Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chem. Intel. Lab. Syst. 58 (2001) 109-130
11. Kourti T., and MacGregor J.F. Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chem. Intel. Lab. Syst. 28 (1995) 3-21
12. MacGregor J.F., Yu H., Muñoz S.G., and Flores-Cerrillo J. Data-based latent variable methods for process analysis, monitoring and control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29 (2005) 1217-1223
13. Metsämuuronena S., Reinikainenb S., and Nyström M. Analysis of protein filtration data by PLS regression. Desalination 149 (2002) 453-458
14. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd ed. (1999), Prentice Hall
15. Bishop C.M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (1995), Oxford University Press
16. Thompson M.L., and Kramer M.A. Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks. AIChE J. 40 (1994) 1328-1340
17. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE. Trans. Automat. Contr. AC-19 (1974) 716-723
18. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc. Met. Res. 33 (2004) 261-304
19. Machado D.R., Hasson D., and Semiat R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I. Investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux. J. Membr. Sci. 163 (1999) 93-102
20. Geens J., Peeters K., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures: influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 255-264
21. GNU Octave, http://www.octave.org.
22. N-way toolbox, http://www.models.kvl.dk/source/nwaytoolbox.
23. Netlab toolbox, http://www.ncrg.aston.ac.uk/netlab.
24. Knovel Critical Tables, Knovel, 2003, http://www.knovel.com.
25. Santos J.L.C., de Beukelaar P., Vankelecom I.F.J., Velizarov S., and Crespo J.G. Effect of solute geometry and orientation on the rejection of uncharged compounds by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 50 (2006) 122-131
26. White L.S. Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 205 (2002) 191-202
27. Reid R.C., Prausnitz J.M., and Poling B.E. The Properties of Gases & Liquids. 4th ed. (1988), McGraw-Hill
28. Dean J.A. Handbook of Chemistry. 12th ed. (1979), McGraw-Hill
29. Barton A.F.M. Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters. 2nd ed. (1991), CRC Press
30. Stengele A., Rey S., and Leuenberger H. A novel approach to the characterization of polar liquids. Part 2. Binary mixtures. Int. J. Pharm. 241 (2002) 231-240
31. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Smith S.J., and Na J.J.W. New experimental measurements of solvent induced swelling in nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 261 (2005) 129-135
32. Wang P., and Anderko A. Computation of dielectric constants of solvent mixtures and electrolyte solutions. Fluid Phase Equilib. 186 (2001) 103-122
33. Zarei H.A. Densities, excess molar volumes and partial molar volumes of the binary mixtures of acetic acid + alkanol (C1-C4) at 298.15 K. J. Mol. Liq. 130 (2007) 74-78
34. Silva P., and Livingston A.G. Effect of solute concentration and mass transfer limitations on transport in organic solvent nanofiltration-partially rejected solute. J. Membr. Sci. 280 (2006) 889-898
35. Barton A.F.M. Handbook of Polymer-liquid Interaction Parameters and Solubility Parameters (1990), CRC Press
36. K. Menaham, H. Mark, K. Inessa, V. Diosie, Filtration membranes and method of making the same, US Patent 5,108,607 (1992).
37. Van der Bruggen B., Geens J., and Vandecasteele C. Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 2511-2518
38. P. Silva, A.G. Livingston, New approach to OSN modelling, J. Membr. Sci., submitted for publication.
39. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A., and Taylor M.L. The influence of polarity and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration-experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 278 (2006) 318-327