Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: A study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 312-320

  Smadja, Carole ^a   Ganem, Guila ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Denmark; Female preference; House mouse; Mate recognition system; Mus musculus; Speciation; Urine signals

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; HYBRID ZONE; MATE CHOICE; MATE RECOGNITION; RODENT; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SUBSPECIES;

DENMARK; JUTLAND;

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; MUSCULUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 0036558751     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.3.312     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alberts AC, 1992. Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates. Am Nat 139:S62-S89.
2. Alibert P, Fel-Clair F, Manolakou K, Britton-Davidian J, Auffray J-C, 1997. Developmental stability, fitness, and trait size in laboratory hybrids between European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 51:1284-1295.
3. Auffray JC, Vanlerberghe F, Britton-Davidian J, 1990. The house mouse progression in Eurasia: A paleontological and archeozoological approach. Biol J Linn Soc 41:13-25.
4. Boursot P, Auffray J-C, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F, 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annu Rev Ecol Sys 24:119-152.
5. Boyse EA, Beauchamp GK, Yamazaki K, 1987. The genetics of body scent. Trends Genet 3:97-102.
6. Butlin R, 1994. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. In: Speciation and the Recognition Concept. Theory and Application (Lambert DM and Spencer HG, eds). Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 327-366.
7. Butlin RK, Ritchie MG, 1991. Variation in female mate preference across a grasshopper hybrid zone. J Evol Biol 4:227-240.
8. Butlin RK, Ritchie MG, 1994. Behaviour and speciation. In: Behaviour and Evolution (Slater PJB, Halliday TR, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 43-79.
9. Christophe N, Baudoin C, 1998. Olfactory preferences in two subspecies of mice Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus and their hybrids. Anim Behav 56:365-369.
10. Coopersmith CB, Lenington S, 1992. Female preferences based on male quality in house mice: Interaction between male dominance rank and t-complex genotype. Ethology 90:1-16.
11. Cotgreave P, 1997. Sexual selection, genetic variation and speciation. J Zool 243:435-436.
12. Cox TP, 1984. Ethological isolation between local populations of house mice (Mus musculus) based on olfaction. Anim Behav 32: 1068-1077.
13. Cox TP, 1989. Odor-based discrimination between noncontiguous demes of wild Mus. J Mammal 70:549-556.
14. Coyne JA, 1993. The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 47:778-788.
15. Coyne JA, Crittenden AP, Mah K, 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Nature 265:1461-1464.
16. Dallas JF, Dod B, Boursot P, Prager EM, Bonhomme F, 1995. Population subdivision and gene flow in Danish house mice. Mol Ecol 4:311-320.
17. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M, 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-360.
18. Dobzhansky T, 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am Nat 74:312-321.
19. Dod B, Jermiin LS, Boursot P, Chapman VH, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F, 1993. Counterselection on sex chromosomes in the Mus musculus European hybrid zone. J Evol Biol 6:529-546.
20. D'udine B, Alleva E, 1983. Early experience and sexual preferences in rodents. In: Mate Choice (Bateson P, eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 311-327.
21. Egid K, Brown JL, 1989. The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice. Anim Behav 38:548-550.
22. Eklund A, Egid K, Brown JL, 1991. The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences of male mice. Anim Behav 42:693-694.
23. Eldredge N, 1994. Species, selection, and Paterson's concept of the specific-mate recognition system. In: Speciation and the Recognition Concept. Theory and Application (Lambert DM, Spencer HG, eds). Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press; 157-174.
24. Endler JA, Houde AE, 1995. Geographic variation in female preference for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
25. Fel-Clair F, 1995. Etude de la Zone d'Hybridation entre Mus musculus Domesticus et Mus musculus musculus au Danemark: Rôle de la Différenciation Chromosomique (Fusions Centriques, Organisateurs Nucléolaires) et Estimation de la Fertilité (PhD dissertation). Montpellier, France: University Montpellier II.
26. Fel-Clair F, Catalan J, Lenormand T, Britton-Davidian J, 1998. Centromeric incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mouse subspecies from Denmark: Evidence from patterns of nor activity. Evolution 52:592-603.
27. Fel-Clair F, Lenormand T, Catalan J, Grobert J, Orth A, Boursot P, Viroux M-C, Britton-Davidian J, 1996. Genomic incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mice in Denmark: Evidence from steep and non-coincident chromosomal clines for Robertsonian fusions. Genet Res Camb 67:123-134.
28. Ferris SD, Sage RD, Huang CM, Nielsen JT, Ritte U, Wilson AC, 1983. Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2290-2294.
29. Ganem G, Searle JB, 1996. Corticosterone and inter chromosomal race discrimination in the house mouse. Horm Behav 30:69-73.
30. Grant PR, Grant BR, 1996. Speciation and hybridization in island birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:765-772.
31. Hatfield T, Schulter D, 1996. A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 50:2429-2434.
32. Howard DJ, 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (Harrison RG, eds). New York: Oxford University Press; 46-69.
33. Hurst JL, 1990a. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim Behav 40:209-222.
34. Hurst JL, 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Anim Behav 40:223-232.
35. Hurst JL, 1990c. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes. Anim Behav 40:233-243.
36. Hurst JL, Barnard CJ, 1992. Kinship and social behavior in wild house mice: Effects of social group membership and relatedness on the responses of dominant males toward juveniles. Behav Ecol 3:196-206.
37. Karn RC, Dlouhy SR, 1991. Salivary androgen-binding protein variation in Mus and other rodents. J Hered 82:453-458.
38. Kirkpatrick M, 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
39. Kirkpatrick M, 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 1649-1655.
40. Krackow S, Matuschak B, 1991. Mate choice for non-siblings in wild house mice: Evidence from a choice test and a reproductive test. Ethology 88:99-108.
41. Lande R, 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
42. Laukaitis CM, Crister ES, Karn RC, 1997. Salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution 51:2000-2005.
43. Lenington S, 1983. Social preferences for partners carrying "good genes" in wild house mice. Anim Behav 31:325-333.
44. Lenington S, Egid K, 1985. Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: A response to T-locus or H-2-locus variability. Behav Genet 15:53-67.
45. Liou LW, Price TD, 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
46. Littlejohn MJ, 1993. Homogamy and speciation: A reappraisal. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 9:135-166.
47. Mayr E, 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
48. Noor MAF, 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503-508.
49. Orth A, Lyapunova E, Kandaurov A, Boissinot S, Boursot P, Vorontsov N, Bonhomme F, 1996. L'espèce polytypique Mus musculus en Transcaucasie. CR Acad Sci Paris 319:435-441.
50. Otte D, 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:385-417.
51. Paterson HEH, 1985. The recognition concept of species. In: Species and Speciation (Vrba ES, ed). Pretoria: Transvaal Museum; 21-29.
52. Penn D, Potts WK, 1998. MHC-disassortative mating prefrences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1299-1306.
53. Prager EM, Orrego C, Sage RD, 1998. Genetic variation and phylogeography of central Asian and other house mice, including a major new mitochondrial lineage in Yemen. Genetics 150:835-861.
54. Raufaste N, 2001. Barrières au Flux Génique et Sélection dans une Zone Hybride: Etude Théorique et Expérimentale chez la Souris Domestique (PhD dissertation). Montpellier, France: University Montpellier II.
55. Ritchie MG, Butlin RK, Hewitt GM, 1989. Assortative mating across a hybrid zone in Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Evol Biol 2:339-352.
56. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1993a. Sexual selection and signal evolution: The ghost of biases past. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 340:187-195.
57. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1993b. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
58. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1995. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in Tugra frogs. Science 269:390-392.
59. Ryan MJ, Wagner WE Jr, 1987. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: Female swordtails prefer heterospecific males. Science 236:595-597.
60. Sage RD, 1981. Wild mice. In: The Mouse in Biomedical Research (Foster HL, ed). New York: Academic Press; 39-90.
61. Sage RD, Atchley WR, Capanna E, 1993. House mice as models in systematic biology. Syst Biol 42:523-561.
62. Sall J, Lehman A, 1996. JMP Start Statistics. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.
63. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M, 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.
64. Thuesen P, 1977. A comparison of the agonistic behaviour of the Mus musculus L. and Mus musculus domesticus Rutty (Mammalia and Rodentia). Vidensk Medd Dan Naturhist Foren 140:117-128.
65. Vanlerberghe F, Boursot P, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F, 1988. A steep cline for mitochondrial DNA in Danish mice. Genet Res Camb 52: 185-193.
66. Vanlerberghe F, Dod B, Boursot P, Bellis M, Bonhomme F, 1986. Absence of Y-chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus. Genet Res Camb 48:191-197.
67. Van Zegeren K, 1980. Variation in aggressiveness and the regulation of numbers in house mouse populations. Neth J Zool 30:635-770.
68. Van Zegeren K, Van Oortmerssen GA, 1981. Frontier disputes between the West and East-European house mouse in Schleswig-Holstein, West Germany. Z Saeugetierkd 46:363-369.
69. Verrell PA, 1988. Stabilizing selection, sexual selection and speciation: A view of specific-mate recognition systems. Syst Zool 37:209-215.
70. Wagner WE, 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55:1029-1042.
71. West-Eberhard MJ, 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58:155-183.
72. Winn BE, Vestal BM, 1986. Kin recognition and choice of males by wild female house mice (Mus musculus). J Comp Psychol 100: 72-75.
73. Witte K, Curio E, 1999. Sexes of a monomorphic species differ in preference for mates with a novel trait. Behav Ecol 10:15-21.
74. Wolff RJ, 1985. Mating behaviour and female choice: Their relation to social structure in wild caught house mice (Mus musculus) housed in a semi-natural environment. J Zool 207:43-51.
75. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Bard J, Boyse EA, 1990. Chemosensory identity and the Y chromosome. Behav Genet 20:157-165.
76. Yanai J, McClearn GE, 1973. Assortative mating in mice. II. Strain differences in female mating preference, male preference, and the question of possible sexual selection. Behav Genet 3:65-74.