The quality and qualities of information

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 675-688

  Mai, Jens Erik ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; INFORMATION QUALITY; PHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION;

ONTOLOGY;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84876672204     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22783     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Andersen, J. (2006). The public sphere and discursive activities: Information literacy as sociopolitical skills. Journal of Documentation, 62(2), 213-228. (Pubitemid 43461713)
2. Arazy, O., & Kopak, R. (2011). On the measurability of information quality. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 89-99.
3. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies:Areview of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
4. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety, and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 25(2), 180-191.
5. Blair, D. (1992). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. The Computer Journal, 35(3), 200-207.
6. Blair, D. (2003). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 3-50. (Pubitemid 36116219)
7. Brier, S. (2004). Cybersemiotics and the problem of the informationprocessing paradigm as a candidate for a unified science of information behind library and information science. Library Trends, 52(3), 629-657.
8. Brookes, B.C. (1980). The foundation of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2(3-4), 125-133.
9. Chapman, S. (2005). Paul Grice: Philosopher and linguist. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Chesney, T. (2006). An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11(11). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org
11. Cornelius, I. (2002). Theorizing information for information science. Annual Review of Information and Technology, 43, 393-425. (Pubitemid 36385209)
12. Day, R.E. (2001). The modern invention of information: Discourse, history, and power. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Day, R.E. (2008). Work and representation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1644-1652.
14. Dretske, F. (2008). Epistemology and information. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 8: Philosophy of Information, ed. Pieter Adriaans and Johan van Benthem. AmsteRDAm: Elsevier.
15. Fallis, D. (2008). Towards an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662-1674.
16. Fink-Shamit, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Information quality assessment on the web: An expression of behaviour. Information Research, 13(4). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/
17. Floridi, L. (2008). Trends in the philosophy of information. In P. Adriaans & J. van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Volume 8: Philosophy of information. AmsteRDAm: Elsevier.
18. Floridi, L. (2010). Information. A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Furner, J. (2004). Information studies without information. Library Trends, 52(3), 427-446. (Pubitemid 38789444)
20. Furner, J. (2010). Philosophy and information study. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 161-200.
21. Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. London: Macmillan.
22. Eco, U. (1994). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23. Fiske, J. (2011). Introduction to communication studies, 3rd ed. NewYork: Routledge.
24. Grice, H.P. (1957). Meaning. In P. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
25. Grice, H.P. (1967). Logic and conversation. In Grice, P., Studies in the way of words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
26. Grice, H.P. (1982). Meaning revisited. In P. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
27. Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S.Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1467-1484. (Pubitemid 351749762)
28. Hjørland, B. (2007). Information: Objective or subjective/situational? Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 58(10), 1448-1456. (Pubitemid 47196188)
29. Hjørland, B. (2011). Evaluation of an information source illustrated by a case study: Effect of screening for breast cancer. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 62(10), 1892-1898.
30. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
31. Ingwersen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
32. Knight, S., & Burn, J. (2005). Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the world wide web. Informing Science Journal, 8, 159-172. (Pubitemid 41664097)
33. Lankes, R.D. (2008). Credibility on the internet: Shifting from authority to reliability. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 667-687.
34. Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2189-2202.
35. Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J.M. (2011). Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1232-1242.
36. Luyt, B., & Tan, D. (2010). ImprovingWikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 715-722.
37. Lycan,W.G. (2008). Philosophy of language:Acontemporary introduction, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
38. Morris, M. (2007). An introduction to the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Peirce, C.S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.
40. Qvortrup, L. (1993). The controversy over the concept of information: An overview and a selected and annotated bibliography. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 1(4), 3-24.
41. Raber, D., & Budd, J.M. (2003). Information as sign: Semiotics and information science. Journal of Documentation, 59(5), 507-522. (Pubitemid 37249631)
42. Rieh, S.Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145-161. (Pubitemid 34138427)
43. Savolainen, R. (2011). Judging the quality and credibility of information in internet discussion forums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1243-1256.
44. Strawson, P. (1970). Meaning and truth. In A.P. Martinich (Ed.), The philosophy of language, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
45. Stvillia, B, Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C., & Gasser, L. (2008). Information quality work organization inWikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 983-1001. (Pubitemid 351548476)
46. Thornley, C., & Gibb, F. (2009). Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR). Journal of Documentation, 65(1), 133-150.
47. Warner, J. (1990). Semiotics, information science, documents, and computers. Journal of Documentation, 46(1), 16-32.
48. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.