Information studies without information

Library Trends

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 427-446

  Furner, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942752407     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Belkin, N. J. (1990). The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 11-15.
2. Blair, D. C. (2002). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology: Vol. 37, 2003 (pp. 3-50). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
3. Bonnevie, E. (2001). Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science. Journal of Documentation, 57(4), 519-534.
4. Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information and information systems. New York: Praeger.
5. Capurro, R., & Hjørland, B. (2002). The concept of information. In B. Cronin. (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology: Vol. 37, 2003 (pp. 343-411). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
6. Case, D.O. (2002). The concept of information. In Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (pp. 39-63). New York: Academic Press.
7. Cornelius, I. (2002). Theorizing information. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology: Vol. 36, 2001/02 (pp. 393-425). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
8. Dick, A. L. (2002). Ontological aspects of information. In The philosophy, politics and economics of information (pp. 31-39). Pretoria, South Africa: Unisa Press.
9. Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Harter, S. P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 602-615.
11. Lycan, W. G. (2000). Philosophy of language: A contemporary introduction. London: Routledge.
12. Machlup, F. (1983). Semantic quirks in studies of information. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 641-671). New York: Wiley.
13. Nöth, W. (1990). Sign. In Handbook of semiotics (pp. 79-91). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Popper, K. (1968). Epistemology without a knowing subject. In B. van Rootselaar & J. F. Staal (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international congress for logic, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 333-373). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
16. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. van Rijsbergen, C. J., & Lalmas, M. (1996). Information calculus for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(5), 385-398.