Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2269-2274

  Breer, Stefan ^a   Hahn, Michael ^a   Kendoff, Daniel ^b   Krause, Matthias ^a   Koehne, Till ^a   Haasper, Carl ^b   Gehrke, Thorsten ^b   Amling, Michael ^a   Gebauer, Matthias ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b ENDO Klinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; TANTALUM; BIOMATERIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HIP SURGERY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; KNEE SURGERY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TRABECULAR BONE; ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; CEMENTATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE AND BONES; CEMENTATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TANTALUM;

EID: 84876541288     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1640-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Flecher X, Sporer S, Paprosky W (2008) Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty 23:949-955
2. Unger AS, Duggan JP (2011) Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees. J Arthroplasty 26:855-860
3. Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME (1999) Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1692-1702
4. DeBoer DK, Christie MJ (1998) Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis: three- to seven-year results. J Arthroplasty 13:674-680
5. Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2004) Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 96-100
6. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP (2009) Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty 24:64-68
7. Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, Saleh L, Gross AE (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 15:951-958
8. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P (2001) Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 202-215
9. Mabry TM, Hanssen AD (2007) The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:56-60
10. Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N (2006) Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:57-60
11. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2004) Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 201-208
12. Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Kim WY, Garbuz DS (2009) Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:199-205
13. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2006) The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 21:83-86
14. Weeden SH, Schmidt RH (2007) The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty 22:151-155
15. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR (2006) Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:83-92
16. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2009) Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):131-138
17. Long WJ, Scuderi GR (2009) Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 24:1086-1092
18. Bobyn JD, Toh KK, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ (1999) Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty 14:347-354
19. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ (2006) Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 27:4671-4681
20. Welldon KJ, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, Findlay DM (2008) Primary human osteoblasts grow into porous tantalum and maintain an osteoblastic phenotype. J Biomed Mater Res A 84:691-701
21. Findlay DM, Welldon K, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, Zannettino AC, Bobyn D (2004) The proliferation and phenotypic expression of human osteoblasts on tantalum metal. Biomaterials 25:2215-2227
22. Tanzer M, Bobyn JD, Krygier JJ, Karabasz D (2008) Histopathologic retrieval analysis of clinically failed porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1282-1289
23. Fernández-Fairen M, Murcia A, Iglesias R, Sevilla P, Manero JM, Gil FJ (2012) Analysis of tantalum implants used for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a review of five retrieved specimens. J Appl Biomater Function Mater. 2012 Mar 15:0. doi: 10.5301/JABB.2012.9128
24. Breer S, Krause M, Busse B, Hahn M, Ruther W, Morlock MM, Amling M, Zustin J (2012) Analysis of retrieved hip resurfacing arthroplasties reveals the interrelationship between interface hyperosteoidosis and demineralization of viable bone trabeculae. J Orthop Res 30:1155-1161
25. Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G (1991) Undecalcified preparation of bone tissue: report of technical experience and development of new methods. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 418:1-7
26. Hahn M (1994) Quantitative analysis of the histological reactions at the interface and the surrounding bone tissue following the implantation of hip endoprostheses. In: Bardosa MA, Campilho A (ed) Imaging techniques in biomaterials. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 325-340
27. Cohen R (2002) A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 31:216-217
28. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ (1999) Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:907-914