The fate of Arabidopsis thaliana homeologous CNSs and their motifs in the paleohexaploid Brassica rapa

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 646-660

  Subramaniam, Sabarinath ^a   Wang, Xiaowu ^b   Freeling, Michael ^a   Pires, J Chris ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis; Brassica rapa; CNS; Conserved noncoding sequence; Deletion; Fractionation; G box; Mutagenesis; PIL5

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; BRASSICA; BRASSICA RAPA; BRASSICACEAE;

EID: 84876534251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt035     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Albertini AM, Hofer M, Calos MP, Miller JH. 1982. On the formation of spontaneous deletions: the importance of short sequence homologies in the generation of large deletions. Cell 29:319-328.
2. Baxter L, et al. 2012. Conserved noncoding sequences highlight shared components of regulatory networks in dicotyledonous plants. Plant Cell 24:3949-3965.
3. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2010. The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution. New Phytol. 186: 54-62.
4. Cheng F, et al. 2012. Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLoS One 7:1-9.
5. Dermitzakis ET, Clark AG. 2002. Evolution of transcription factor binding sites in Mammalian gene regulatory regions: conservation and turnover. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1114-1121.
6. Devos KM, Brown JK, Bennetzen JL. 2002. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 127:1075-1079.
7. Freeling M. 2009. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:433-453.
8. Freeling M, Rapaka L, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Thomas BC. 2007. G-boxes, bigfoot genes, and environmental response: characterization of intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:1441-1457.
9. Freeling M, Subramaniam S. 2009. Conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 12:126-132.
10. Freeling M, et al. 2012. Fractionation mutagenesis and similar consequences of mechanisms removing dispensable or less-expressed DNA in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15:131-139.
11. Hancock JM, Shaw PJ, Bonneton F, Dover GA. 1999. High sequence turnover in the regulatory regions of the developmental gene hunchback in insects. Mol Biol Evol. 16:253-265.
12. Hollister JD, Ross-Ibarra J, Gaut BS. 2010. Indel-associated mutation rate varies with mating system in flowering plants. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 409-416.
13. Junion G, et al. 2012. A transcription factor collective defines cardiac cell fate and reflects lineage history. Cell 148:473-486.
14. Kaplinsky NJ, Braun DM, Penterman J, Goff SA, Freeling M. 2002. Utility and distribution of conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:6147-6151.
15. Koonin EV. 2005. Orthologs, paralogs and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 39:309-338.
16. Lee AP, Kerk SY, Tan YY, Brenner S, Venkatesh B. 2011. Ancient vertebrate conserved noncoding elements have been evolving rapidly in teleost fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 283:1205-1215.
17. Liman ER, Innan H. 2003. Relaxed selective pressure on an essential component of pheromone transduction in primate evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100:3328-3332.
18. Lockton S, Gaut BS. 2005. Plant conserved non-coding sequences and paralogue evolution. Trends Genet. 21:60-65.
19. Ludwig MZ, Bergman C, Patel NH, Kreitman M. 2000. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 403: 564-567.
20. Lynch M, Force A. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459-473.
21. Lyons E, Freeling M. 2008. How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J. 53: 661-673.
22. Moses AM, et al. 2006. Large-scale turnover of functional transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila. PLoS Comput Biol. 2:1219-1231.
23. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 48:443-453.
24. Oh E, et al. 2009. Genome-wide analysis of genes targeted by phytochrome interacting factor 3-like5 during seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21:403-419.
25. Pennacchio LA, Loots GG, Nobrega MA, Ovcharenko A. 2007. Predicting tissue-specific enhancers in the human genome. Genome Res. 17: 201-211.
26. Petrov DA, Lozovskaya ER, Hartl DL. 1996. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Nature 384:346-349.
27. Petrov DA. 2002. Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 61:531-544.
28. Raatz B, et al. 2011. Specific expression of lateral suppressor is controlled by an evolutionarily conserved 3′ enhancer. Plant J. 68:400-412.
29. Reineke AR, Bornberg-Bauer E, Gu J. 2011. Evolutionary divergence and limits of conserved non-coding sequence detection in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:6029-6043.
30. Sankoff D, Zhen C, Zhu Q. 2010. The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 11:313-324.
31. Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Subramaniam S, Freeling M. 2011. Dose-sensitivity, conserved noncoding sequences and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses. Front Plant Genet Genomics. 2:1-7.
32. Schrider DR, Costello JC, Hahn MW. 2009. All human-specific gene losses are present in the genome as pseudogenes. J Comput Biol. 16: 1419-1427.
33. Spangler JB, Subramaniam S, Freeling M, Feltus FA. 2011. Evidence of function for conserved noncoding sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 193:241-252.
34. Tang H, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Paterson A, Freeling M. 2011. Screening synteny blocks in pairwise genome comparisons through integer programming. BMC Bioinformatics 12:102-113.
35. Tang H, et al. 2012. Altered patterns of fractionation and exon deletions in Brassica rapa support a two-step model of paleohexaploidy. Genetics 190:1563-1574.
36. Thomas BC, Rapaka L, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Freeling M. 2007. Arabidopsis intragenomic conserved noncoding sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:3348-3353.
37. Tian Z, et al. 2009. Do genetic recombination and gene density shape the pattern of DNA elimination in rice long terminal repeat retrotransposons? Genome Res. 19:2221-2230.
38. Van de Peer Y. 2011. A mystery unveiled. Genome Biol. 12:113.
39. von Rohr P, FribergMT, Kadarmideen HN. 2007. Prediction of transcription factor binding sites using genetical genomics methods. J Bioinform Comput Biol. 5:773-793.
40. Wang X, et al. 2011. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 43:1035-1039.
41. Wicker T, Buchmann JP, Keller B. 2010. Patching gaps in plant genomes results in gene movement and erosion of colinearity. Genome Res. 20: 1229-1237.
42. Wolfe KH. 2001. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet. 2:333-341.
43. WoodhouseM, et al. 2010. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000409.
44. Zhang W, et al. 2012. High-resolution mapping of open chromatin in the rice genome. Genome Res. 22:151-162.