Identifying causal networks of neuronal sources from EEG/MEG data with the phase slope index: A simulation study

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 165-178

  Ewald, Arne ^a,b   Avarvand, Forooz Shahbazi ^c,d   Nolte, Guido ^e  

^a NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c FRAUNHOFER FOKUS   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

effective connectivity; electroencephalography; imaginary part of coherency; magnetoencephalography; source localization; volume conduction

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITIES; HIGH TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; IMAGINARY PARTS; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; NEURONAL SYNCHRONIZATION; SOURCE LOCALIZATION; VOLUME CONDUCTION;

BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

NEURONS;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CAUSALITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84876513498     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0028     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Avarvand FS, Ewald A, Nolte G. Localizing true brain interactions from EEG and MEG data with subspace methods and modified beam formers. Comp Math Methods Med 2012; 2012: 402341
2. Baccala L, Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: A new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 2001; 84: 463-474
3. Baillet S, Mosher J, Leahy R. Electromagnetic brain mapping. Signal Process Mag IEEE 2001; 18: 14-30
4. Bendat J, Piersol A. Random data; analysis and measurement procedures. New York: Wiley-Interscience 1971
5. Ewald A, Marzetti L, Zappasodi F, Meinecke FC, Nolte G. Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space. NeuroImage 2012; 60: 476-488
6. Fonov V, Evans A, McKinstry R, Almli C, Collins D. Unbiased nonlinear average age-Appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. NeuroImage 2009; 47: 102
7. Fonov V, Evans AC, Botteron K, Almli CR, McKinstry RC, Collins DL. Unbiased average age-Appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. NeuroImage 2011; 54: 313-327
8. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9: 474-480
9. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003; 19: 1273-1302
10. Granger C. Investigating causal relations by economic models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969; 37: 424-438
11. Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Salmelin R. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 694-699
12. Hnen M, Ilmoniemi R. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: Minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994; 32: 35-42
13. Haufe S, Nikulin VV, Ziehe A, M üller K-R, Nolte G. Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction. NeuroImage 2008; 42: 726-738
14. Haufe S, Nikulin VV, M üller K-R, Nolte G. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study. NeuroImage 2013; 64: 120-133
15. Hyvarinen A, Oja E. Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 2000; 13: 411-430
16. Ioannides AA, Bolton JPR, Clarke CJS. Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems 1990; 6: 523
17. Jeffs B, Leahy R, Singh M. An evaluation of methods for neuromagnetic image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987; 24: 713-723
18. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 2001; 85: 145-157
19. Marzetti L, Del Gratta C, Nolte G. Understanding brain connectivity from EEG data by identifying systems composed of interacting sources. NeuroImage 2008; 42: 87-98
20. Miller RG. The jackknife-A review. Biometrika 1974; 61: 1-15
21. Mosher J, Leahy R. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (rap) music. Signal Process IEEE Trans 1999; 47: 332-340
22. Nikulin VV, Nolte G, Curio G. A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition. NeuroImage 2011; 55: 1528-1535
23. Nolte G, Dassios G. Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 3807
24. Nolte G, M üller K. Localizing and estimating causal relations of interacting brain rhythms. Front Hum Neurosci 2010; 4: 00209
25. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2292-2307
26. Nolte G, Meinecke F, Ziehe A, M üller K. Identifying interactions in mixed and noisy complex systems. Phys Rev E 2006; 73: 051913
27. Nolte G, Ziehe A, Nikulin V, et al. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 234101
28. Nunez P, Srinivasan R, Westdorf A, et al. EEG coherency. I. Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 103: 499-515
29. Pascual-Marqui RD. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002; 24 (Suppl D): 5-12
30. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koukkou M, et al. Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2011; 369: 3768-3784
31. Plonsey R, Heppner DB. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull Math Biophys 1967; 29: 657-664
32. Schmidt R. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 1986; 32: 276-280
33. Schoffelen J, Gross J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 1857-1865
34. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 1999; 24: 49-65
35. Singer W, Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18: 555-586
36. Stinstra J, Peters M. The volume conductor may act as a temporal filter on the ECG and EEG. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998; 36: 711-716
37. Varela F, Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 229-239
38. Zeki S, Shipp S. The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature 1988; 335: 311-317