Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction

NeuroImage

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 726-738

  Haufe, Stefan ^a,b   Nikulin, Vadim V ^c,d   Ziehe, Andreas ^a,b   Müller, Klaus Robert ^a,b,d   Nolte, Guido ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER FIRST   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

1 norm Regularization; EEG MEG; Inverse problem; Rotational invariance; Second order cone programming; Source localization; Sparsity; Vector fields

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COORDINATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FOCAL VECTOR FIELD RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 47949124679     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.246     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baillet S., and Garnero L. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 (1997) 374-385
2. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., and Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 18 (2001) 14-30
3. Bennett K.P., and Mangasarian O.L. Robust linear programming discrimination of two linearly inseparable sets. Optim. Method. Softw. 1 (1992) 23-34
4. Boyd S., and Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Candes E., Romberg J., and Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 (2006) 489-509
6. Chen S.S., Donoho D.L., and Saunders M.A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 (1998) 33-61
7. Cotter S.F., Rao B.D., Engan K., and Kreutz-Delgado K. Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors. IEEE Trans. Signal Proces. 53 (2005) 2477-2488
8. Dale A.M., and Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 162-176
9. Gorodnitsky I.F., George J.S., and Rao B.D. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 21 (1995) 231-251
10. Graepel T., Herbrich R., Schölkopf B., Smola A., Bartlett P., Müller K.R., Obermayer K., and Williamson R. Classification on proximity data with LP-machines. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (1999) 304-309
11. Hämäläinen M.S., and Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 32 (1994) 35-42
12. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., and Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22 (1998) 324-333
13. Huang M.X., Dale A.M., Song T., Halgren E., Harrington D.L., Podgorny I., Canive J.M., Lewise S., and Lee R.R. Vector-based spatial-temporal minimum L1-norm solution for MEG. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 1025-1037
14. Huttunen J., Komssi S., and Lauronen L. Spatial dynamics of population activities at S1 after median and ulnar nerve stimulation revisited: an MEG study. NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1024-1031
15. Jeffs B., Leahy R., and Singh M. An evaluation of methods for neuromagnetic image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34 (1987) 713-723
16. Kincses W.E., Braun C., Kaiser S., Grodd W., Ackermann H., and Mathiak K. Reconstruction of extended cortical sources for EEG and MEG based on a Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain estimator. Hum. Brain Mapp. 18 (2003) 100-110
17. Köhler T., Wagner M., Fuchs M., Wischmann H.A., Drenckhahn R., and Theißen A. Depth normalization in MEG/EEG current density imaging. 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (1996) 812-813
18. Komssi S., Huttunen J., Aronen H.J., and Ilmoniemi R.J. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 (2004) 534-542
19. Lobo M.S., Vandenberghe L., Boyd S., and Lebret H. Applications of second-order cone programming. Lin. Alg. Appl. 284 (1998) 193-228
20. Malioutov D., Çetin M., and Willsky A.S. A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays. IEEE Trans. Signal Proces. 55 (2005) 3010-3022
21. Matsuura K., and Okabe Y. Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42 (1995) 608-615
22. Mauguière F., Merlet I., Forss N., Vanni V., Jousmäki P.A., and Hari R. Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. a dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. part I: location and activation timing of SEF sources. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 281-298
23. Mosher J.C., and Leahy R.M. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC. IEEE Trans. Signal Proces. 47 (1999) 332-340
24. Nakata K., Yamashita M., Fujisawa K., and Kojima M. A parallel primal-dual interior-point method for semidefinite programs using positive definite matrix completion. Parallel Comput. 32 (2006) 24-43
25. Nolte G., and Dassios G. Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors. Phys. Med. Biol. 50 (2005) 3807-3823
26. Nunez P.L., and Srinivasan R. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Meth. Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24 (2002) 5-12
28. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., and Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 18 (1994) 49-65
29. Polonsky A., and Zibulevsky M. MEG/EEG source localization using spatio-temporal sparse representations. In: Puntonet C.G., and Prieto A. (Eds). Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, Fifth International Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2004), Springer 1001-1008
30. Rubner Y., Tomasi C., and Guibas L.J. The earth mover's distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int. J. Comput. Vision 40 (2000) 99-121
31. Rudin L.I., Osher S., and Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variations based noise removal algorithms. Physica, D 60 (1992) 259-268
32. Scherg M., and von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65 (1986) 344-360
33. Schmidt R.O. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 43 (1986) 276-280
34. Sturm J.F. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim. Method. Softw. 11-12 (1999) 625-653
35. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Meth. 58 (1996) 267-288
36. Tibshirani R., Saunders M., Rosset S., Zhu J., and Knight K. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Meth. 67 (2005) 91-108
37. Uutela K., Hämäläinen M., and Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage 10 (1999) 173-180
38. Veen B.D.V., and Buckley K.M. Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Magazine 5 (1988) 4-24
39. Yuan M., and Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Meth. 68 (2006) 49-67