Spontaneously Occurring micronuclei in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast: A potential biomarker for aggressive phenotype detection?

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 296-302

  Goel, Shubham ^a   Bhatia, Alka ^a   Dey, Pranab ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; chromosomal instability; FNAC; IDC; micronucleus; S phase fraction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST LESION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INFILTRATION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTOPATHOLOGY; FEMALE; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; PHENOTYPE; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AGED; BREAST; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CELL NUCLEUS; EPITHELIUM CELL; INDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR SHAPE; NUCLEAR SIZE; PATHOLOGY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; YOUNG ADULT;

TUMOR MARKER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANEUPLOIDY; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS SHAPE; CELL NUCLEUS SIZE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PHENOTYPE; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876459432     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21836     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gisselsson D, Pettersson L, Glund M, Gorunova L, Wiegant J, Mertens F, et al. Chromosomal breakage-fusion-bridge events cause genetic intratumor heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 5357-5362.
2. Thompson SL, Compton DA,. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 2008; 180: 665-672.
3. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B,. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998; 396: 643-649.
4. IARC. 2003. World health organization classification of tumors, Pathology and genetics of tumors of breast and female genital organs, Lyon, France.
5. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman P, Roydasgupta R, Kuo W, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell 2006; 10: 529-541.
6. Monica MR, Amy KB, Daniel WV, Wilma LL, Matthew JS, Edith AP, et al. Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: Implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 267-277.
7. Tanner MM, Trikkonen M, Kallioniemi A, Holli K, Collins C, Kowbel D, et al. Amplification of chromosomal region 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: prognostic implications. Clin Cancer Res 1995; 1: 1455-1461.
8. Tanner MM, Trikkonen M, Kallioniemi A, Collins C, Stokke T, Karhu R, et al. Increased copy number at 20q13 in breast cancer: Defining the critical region and exclusion of candidate genes. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 4257-4260.
9. Behjati F, Atri M, Najmabadi H, Nouri K, Zamani M, Mehdipour P,. Prognostic value of chromosome 1 and 8 copy number in invasive ductal breast carcinoma among Iranian women: An interphase FISH analysis. Pathol Oncol Res 2005; 111: 157-163.
10. Fenech M, Holland N, Chang WP, Zeiger E, Bonassi S,. The human micronucleus project-An international collaborative study on the use of the micronucleus technique for measuring DNA damage in humans. Mutat Res 1999; 428: 271-283.
11. Dey P,. Aneuploidy and malignancy: An unsolved equation. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 1245-1249.
12. DeMay MR,. 1996. The art and science of cytopathology. 1st ed. Hong Kong: American Society of Clinical Pathology.
13. M. Fenech,. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 2000; 455: 81-95.
14. Nahar U, Dey P, Vohra H, Gupta S,. DNA flow cytometry of non hodgkin's lymphomas: Correlation with cytologic grade and clinical relapse. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22: 152-156.
15. Ross JS, Linette GP, Stec J, Ross SM, Anwar S, Bogunicwicz J,. DNA ploidy and cell cycle analysis in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 72-84.
16. Baylin SB, Belinsky SA, Herman JG,. Aberrant methylation of gene promoters in cancer-concepts, misconcepts, and promise. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1460-1461.
17. Mommers EC, Leonhart AM, Falix F, Michalides R, Meijer CJ, Baak JP, et al. Similarity in expression of cell cycle proteins between in situ and invasive ductal breast lesions of same differentiation grade. J Pathol 2001; 194: 327-333.
18. Fenech M, Bonassi S, Turner J, Lando C, Ceppi M, Chang WP, et al. Intra- and inter laboratory variation in the scoring of micronuclei and nucleoplasmic bridges in binucleated human lymphocytes. Results of an international slide-scoring exercise by the HUMN project. Mutat Res 2003; 534: 45-64.
19. Bonassi S, Znaor A, Ceppi M, Lando C, Chang WP, Holland N, et al. An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 625-631.
20. Kronenwett U, Huwendiek S, String C, Portwood N, Roblick U, Pawitan Y, et al. Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 904-909.
21. Palmer J, Mcdivitt RW, Stone KR, Rudloff MA, Gonzalez GJ,. Flow cytometric analysis of breast needle aspirates. Cancer 1988; 62: 2387-2391.
22. Tanner MM, Karhu RA, Nupponen NN, Borg A, Baldetorp B, Pejovic T, et al. Genetic abberations in hypodiploid breast cancer. Am J Pathol 1998; 153: 191-199.
23. Clark GM, Mathieu MC, Owens MA, Dressler LG, Eudey L, Tormey DC, et al. Prognostic significance of S-phase fraction in good-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 428-432.
24. Hedley DW, Clark GM, Cornelisse CJ, Killander D, Kute T, Merkel D,. Consensus review of clinical utility of DNA contents cytometry in prostate cancer. Cytometry 1993; 14: 497-500.
25. Pinto AE, Fonceca I, Soares J,. The clinical relevance of ploidy and S-phase fraction determination in salivary gland tumors: A flow cytometric study of 97 cases. Cancer 1999; 85: 273-281.
26. Romero H, Schneider J, Burgos J, Bilbao J, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ,. S-phase fraction identifies high-risk subgroups among DNA diploid breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996; 38: 265-275.
27. Martinez-Arribas F, Nuñez-Villar MJ, Lucas AR, Sanchez J, Tejerina A, Schneider J,. The S-phase fraction of the aneuploid cell subpopulation is the biologically relevant one in aneuploid breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 92: 77-80.
28. Bhattarai S, Kapila K, Verma K,. Phyllodes tumor of the breast. A cytohistologic study of 80 cases. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 790-796.
29. Stanley MW, Tani EM, Rutqvist LE, Skoog L,. Cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast: A cytologic and clinicopathologic study of 23 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 29-34.
30. Moureau-Zabotto L, Bouchet C, Cesari D, Uzan S, Lefranc JP, Antoine M, et al. Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node- negative invasive breast carcinoma: Analysis of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91: 61-71.