Memory and other properties of multiple test procedures generated by entangledgraphs

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1739-1753

  Maurer, Willi ^a   Bretz, Frank ^a,b  

^a NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Default graph; Fallback; Fixed sequence; Gatekeeping; Multiple endpoints; Truncated Holm

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENTANGLED GRAPH; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEMORY (STATISTICAL CONCEPT); NULL HYPOTHESIS; PLOTS AND CURVES; SEQUENTIALLY REJECTIVE GRAPHICAL TEST PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; BIOSTATISTICS; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84876440489     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5711     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hommel G, Bretz F, Maurer W. Powerful short-cuts for multiple testing procedures with special reference to gatekeeping strategies. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:4063-4073.
2. Guilbaud O. Bonferroni parallel gatekeeping-transparent generalization, adjusted p-values and short direct proofs. Biometrical Journal 2007; 49:917-927.
3. Dmitrienko A, Tamhane A, Wiens B. General multi-stage gatekeeping procedures. Biometrical Journal 2008; 50:667-677.
4. Li J, Mehrotra D. An efficient method for accommodating potentially underpowered primary endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:5377-5391.
5. Alosh M, Huque MF. A consistency-adjusted alpha-adaptive strategy for sequential testing. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:1559-1571.
6. Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC. Mixtures of multiple testing procedures for gatekeeping applications in clinical trial applications. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:1473-1488.
7. Dmitrienko A, Kordzakhia G, Tamhane AC. Multistage and mixture parallel gatekeeping procedures in clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2011; 21:726-747.
8. Kim HJ, Entsuah R, Shults J. The union closure method for testing a fixed sequence of families of hypotheses. Biometrika 2011; 98:391-401.
9. Maurer W, Glimm E, Bretz F. Multiple and repeated testing of primary, co-primary and secondary hypotheses. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 2011; 3(3):336-352.
10. Hung HMJ, Wang SJ. Some controversial multiple testing problems in regulatory applications. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2009; 19:1-11.
11. Bretz F, Maurer W, Brannath W, Posch M. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:586-604.
12. Burman CF, Sonesson C, Guilbaud O. A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:739-761.
13. Hung HMJ, Wang SJ. Challenges to multiple testing in clinical trials. Biometrical Journal 2010; 52:747-756.
14. Lawrence J. Testing non-inferiority and superiority for two endpoints for several treatments with a control. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2011; 10:318-324.
15. Guilbaud O. Note on simultaneous inferences about non-inferiority and superiority for a primary and a secondary endpoint. Biometrical Journal 2011; 53(6):927-937.
16. Huque MF, Alosh M, Bhore R. Addressing multiplicity issues of a composite endpoint and its components in clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2011; 21:610-634.
17. Bretz F, Posch M, Glimm E, Klinglmueller F, Maurer W, Rohmeyer K. Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes or parametric tests. Biometrical Journal 2011; 53:894-913.
18. Millen BA, Dmitrienko A. Chain procedures: a class of flexible closed testing procedures with clinical trial applications. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 2011; 3(1):14-30.
19. Bretz F, Maurer W, Hommel G. Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 13:1489-1501.
20. Holm S. A simple sequentally rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979; 6:65-70.
21. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple significance testing. Biometrika 1988; 75:800-802.
22. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedure with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63:655-660.
23. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Multiple hypothesis testing with weights. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1997; 24:407-418.
24. Gabriel KR. Simultaneous test procedures-some theory of multiple comparisons. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1969; 40:224-250.
25. Maurer W, Hothorn L, Lehmacher W. Multiple comparisons in drug clinical trials and preclinical assays: a priori ordered hypotheses. In Biometrie in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie, Vollmar J (ed.). Fischer Verlag: Stuttgart, 1995; 3-18.
26. Wiens BL. A fixed sequence Bonferroni procedure for testing multiple endpoints. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2003; 2:211-215.
27. Strassburger K, Bretz F. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:4914-4927.
28. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). Guidance for Industry- Clinical Development Programs for Drugs, Devices, and Biological Products for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). US Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
29. 0 ab, wenn k unter n gegebenen Tests zur Ablehnung führen". Metrika 1978; 25:171-178.
30. Hommel G, Bretz F, Maurer W. Multiple hypotheses testing based on ordered p values-a historical survey with applications to medical research. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2011; 21:595-609.
31. Hommel G. Multiple test procedures for arbitrary dependences structures. Metrika 1986; 33:321-336.