Multistage and mixture parallel gatekeeping procedures in clinical trials

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 726-747

  Dmitrienko, Alex ^a   Kordzakhia, George ^b   Tamhane, Ajit C ^c  

^a ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Closure principle; Familywise error rate; Mixture procedure; Multiple comparisons; Parallel gatekeeping

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BONFERRONI PROCEDURE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTROL STRATEGY; ERROR RATE FUNCTION; HOCHBERG PROCEDURE; HOLM PROCEDURE; MATHEMATICAL AND STATISTICAL PROCEDURES; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PARALLEL GATEKEEPING PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE STAGE GATEKEEPING PROCEDURE; TWO STAGE PARALLEL GATEKEEPING PROCEDURE;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79957462656     PISSN: 10543406     EISSN: 15205711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551333     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bretz, F., Maurer, W., Brannath, W., Posch, M. (2009). A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Statistics in Medicine 28:586-604.
2. Brechenmacher, T., Xu, J., Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A.C. (2011). A mixture gatekeeping procedure based on the Hommel test for clinical trial applications. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 21:748-767.
3. Burman, C.-F., Sonesson, C., Guilbaud, O. (2009). A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests. Statistics in Medicine 28:739-761.
4. Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C. (2009). Gatekeeping procedures in clinical trials. In: Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C., Bretz, F., eds. Multiple Testing Problems in Pharmaceutical Statistics. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
5. Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C. (2011). Mixtures of multiple testing procedures for gatekeeping applications in clinical trials. To appear in Statistics in Medicine, in press.
6. Dmitrienko, A., Offen, W. W., Westfall, P. H. (2003). Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant. Statistics in Medicine 22:2387-2400. (Pubitemid 36949661)
7. Dmitrienko, A., Molenberghs, G., Chuang-Stein, C., Offen, W. (2005). Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Press, pp. 67-127.
8. Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C., Wiens, B. (2008). General multistage gatekeepingprocedures. Biometrical Journal 50:667-677.
9. Gabriel, K. R. (1969). Simultaneous test procedures - some theory of multiple comparisons. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40:224-250.
10. Grechanovsky, E., Hochberg, Y. (1999). Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 76:79-91.
11. Guilbaud, O. (2007). Bonferroni parallel gatekeeping-transparent generalizations, adjusted p values and short direct proofs. Biometrical Journal 49:217-227.
12. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800-802.
13. Hochberg, Y., Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Multiple Scandanavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70.
15. Hommel, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75:383-386.
16. Kordzakhia, G., Dinh, P., Bai, S., Lawrence, J., Yang, P. (2008). Bonferroni-based tree-structured gatekeeping testing procedures. Unpublished manuscript.
17. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63:655-660.
18. Sarkar, S., Chang, C. K. (1997). Simes' method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92:1601-1608.
19. Sarkar, S. K. (1998). Some probability inequalities for censored MTP2 random variables: A proof of the Simes conjecture. Annals of Statistics 26:494-504.
20. Westfall, P. H., Tobias, R. D., Rom, D., Wolfinger, R. D., Hochberg, Y. (1999). Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Press.