Testing non-inferiority and superiority for two endpoints for several treatments with a control

Pharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 318-324

  Lawrence, John ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dunnett's test; Gatekeeping tests; multiple comparisons with a control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE CALCULATION; ERROR; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 79960812381     PISSN: 15391604     EISSN: 15391612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pst.468     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Dmitrienko A, Offen W, Wang O, Xiao D., Gatekeeping procedures in dose-response clinical trials based on the Dunnett test. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2006; 5: 19-28. (Pubitemid 43380265)
2. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR., On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63: 655-660.
3. Grechanovsky E, Hochberg Y., Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 1999; 76: 79-91.
4. Genz A, Bretz F., Computation of multivariate normal and t probabilities. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 195. Springer: Heidelberg, 2009.
5. Bretz F, Maurer W, Brannath W, Posch M., A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28: 586-604.