Note on simultaneous inferences about non-inferiority and superiority for a primary and a secondary endpoint

Biometrical Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 927-937

  Guilbaud, Olivier ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Graphical testing procedures; Non inferiority; Recycling framework; Simultaneous confidence regions; Superiority

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE REGION; GRAPHICAL TESTING PROCEDURE; MULTIPLE TESTING; NON-INFERIORITY; PROPERTY; RECYCLING FRAMEWORK; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE REGION; SUPERIORITY; TESTING PROCEDURE;

STATISTICS;

EID: 80755143351     PISSN: 03233847     EISSN: 15214036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201000247     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bretz, F., Maurer, W., Brannath, W. and Posch, M. (2009). A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Statistics in Medicine 28, 586-604.
2. Bretz, F., Maurer, W. and Hommel, G. (2011). Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures. Statistics in Medicine 30, 1489-1501.
3. Burman, C.-F., Sonesson, C. and Guilbaud, O. (2009). A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests. Statistics in Medicine 28, 739-761.
4. Dmitrienko, A. and Tamhane, A. C. (2007). Gatekeeping procedures with clinical trial applications. Pharmaceutical Statistics 6, 171-180.
5. Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C. and Wiens, B. L. (2008). General multistage gatekeeping procedures. Biometrical Journal 50, 667-677.
6. Guilbaud, O. (2008). Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm's step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures. Biometrical Journal 50, 678-692.
7. Guilbaud, O. (2009). Alternative confidence regions for Bonferroni-based closed-testing procedures that are not alpha-exhaustive. Biometrical Journal 51, 721-735.
8. Guilbaud, O. and Karlsson, P. (2011). Confidence regions for Bonferroni-based closed test extended to more general closed tests. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 21, 682-707.
9. Hommel, G., Bretz, F. and Maurer, W. (2007). Powerful short-cuts for multiple testing procedures with special reference to gatekeeping strategies. Statistics in Medicine 26, 4063-4073.
10. Hung, H. M. J. and Wang, S.-J. (2010). Challenges to multiple testing in clinical trials. Biometrical Journal 52, 747-756.
11. Huque, M. F., Alosh, M. and Bhore, R. (2011). Addressing multiplicity issues of a composite endpoint and its components in clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 21, 610-634.
12. Liu, Y. and Hsu, J. C. (2009). Testing for efficacy in primary and secondary endpoints by partitioning decision paths. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104, 1661-1670.
13. Röhmel, J., Gerlinger, C., Benda, N. and Läuter, J. (2006). On testing simultaneously non-inferiority in two multiple primary endpoints and superiority in at least one of them. Biometrical Journal 48, 916-933.
14. Strassburger, K. and Bretz, F. (2008). Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests. Statistics in Medicine 27, 4914-4927.