An evaluation of post-lumpectomy recurrence rates: Is follow-up every 6 months for 2 years needed?

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 597-601

  McNaul, David ^a   Darke, Maxine ^a   Garg, Megha ^a   Dale, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; breast conservation; mammography; short interval

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84876412781     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23298     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. National Cancer Institute: Cancer stat fact sheets, 2007-2009. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html#risk Accessed June 13, 2012.
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-1241.
3. Rapiti E, Fioretta G, Vlastos G, et al.: Breast-conserving surgery has equivalent effect as mastectomy on stage I breast cancer prognosis only when followed by radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2003; 69: 277-284.
4. Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ,: The postconservation breast: Part 2, imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 331-343.
5. Hymas RV, Gaffney DK, Parkinson BT, et al.: Is short-interval mammography necessary after breast conservation surgery and radiation treatment in breast cancer patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Pys 2012; 83: 519-524.
6. Dershaw DD,: Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 309-316.
7. Buist DS, Abraham LA, Barlow WE, et al.: Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 124: 863-873.
8. Lash TL, Fox MP, Buist DS, et al.: Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3001-3006.
9. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al.: Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 25: CD001768.
10. Kontos M, Roy P, Rizos D, et al.: An evidence based strategy for follow up after breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2011; 104: 223-227.
11. Ashkanani F, Sarkar T, Needham G, et al.: What is achieved by mammographic surveillance after breast conservation treatment for breast cancer? Am J Surg 2001; 182: 207-210.
12. Grosse A, Schreer I, Frischbier HJ, et al.: Results of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer and the role of mammographic follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 761-767.
13. Arasu VA, Joe BN, Lvoff NM, et al.: Benefit of semiannual ipsilateral mammographic surveillance following breast conservation therapy. Radiology 2012; Epub ahead of print.
14. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5091-5097.
15. Grunfeld E, Dhesy-Thind S, Levine M,: Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update). CMAJ 2005; 172: 1319-1320.
16. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al.: Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006; 241: 55-66.
17. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ, et al.: Time-course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15: 255-261.
18. Gage I, Recht A, Gelman R, et al.: Long-term outcome following breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33: 245-251.
19. Lin K, Eradat J, Mehta NH, et al.: Is a short-interval postradiation mammogram necessary after conservative surgery and radiation in breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Pys 2008; 72: 1041-1047.
20. Maxwell JR, Bugbee ME, Wellisch D, et al.: Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: Study of psychological outcomes. Breast J 2000; 6: 53-61.
21. Aro AR, Pilvikki Absetz S, van Elderen TM, et al.: False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress: Breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 1089-1097.
22. Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ,: The postconservation breast: Part 1, expected imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 321-330.
23. Weight SC, Windle R, Stotter AT,: Optimizing surveillance mammography following breast conservation surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28: 11-13.
24. Pinsky RW, Rebner M, Pierce LJ, et al.: Recurrent cancer after breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Mammographic features, method of detection, and stage of recurrence. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 140-144.
25. Zhou P, Gautam S, Recht A,: Factors affecting outcome for young women with early stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 101: 51-57.