The postconservation breast: Part 2, imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 331-343

  Chansakul, Thanissara ^a   Lai, Kenny C ^a   Slanetz, Priscilla J ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; Breast conservation; Mammography; Radiation oncology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; INFECTION RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION HAZARD; RADIATION INDUCED NEOPLASM; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT CANCER; SCAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CICATRIX; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIATION INJURIES;

EID: 84856080491     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6881     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: systematic evidence review update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: evidence review update no. 74. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009:AHRQ publication no. 10-05142-EF-1
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1456-1461
3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233-1241 (Pubitemid 35176242)
4. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty- year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227-1232 (Pubitemid 35176241)
5. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1143-1150
6. Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28:289-294 (Pubitemid 40800482)
7. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen- year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer 2003; 98:697-702 (Pubitemid 36959264)
8. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Tenyear results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:907-911
9. Dershaw DD. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR 1995; 164:309-316
10. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, et al. Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: frequency, time course, and prognosis. Cancer 1989; 63:1912-1917 (Pubitemid 19118888)
11. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Farrell RS Jr, Pruneda JM, Flaming DP. Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery. AJR 1997; 168:485-488 (Pubitemid 27051994)
12. Chansakul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ. The postconservation breast. Part 1. Expected imaging findings. AJR 2012; 198:321-330
13. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ, et al. Time-course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15:255-261
14. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Recht A, et al. Breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. II. Detection, pathologic features and prognostic significance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11:1277-1284 (Pubitemid 15067910)
15. Dershaw DD, McCormick B, Cox L, Osborne MP. Differentiation of benign and malignant local tumor recurrence after lumpectomy. AJR 1990; 155:35-38 (Pubitemid 20218670)
16. Dershaw DD, McCormick B, Osborne MP. Detection of local recurrence after conservative therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 70:493-496
17. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ, Rubenstein J, Goodman RL. Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19:833-842 (Pubitemid 20345149)
18. Stomper PC, Recht A, Berenberg AL, Jochelson MS, Harris JR. Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast. AJR 1987; 148:39-43 (Pubitemid 17005358)
19. Hassell PR, Olivotto IA, Mueller HA, Kingston GW, Basco VE. Early breast cancer: detection of recurrence after conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology 1990; 176:731-735 (Pubitemid 20266765)
20. Buckley JH, Roebuck EJ. Mammographic changes following radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 337-344 (Pubitemid 16092858)
21. Paulus DD. Conservative treatment of breast cancer: mammography in patient selection and follow- up. AJR 1984; 143:483-487 (Pubitemid 14066644)
22. Orel SG, Troupin RH, Patterson EA, Fowble BL. Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and irradiation: role of mammography in detection. Radiology 1992; 183:201-206
23. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Köbrunner SH. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. MAGMA 1998; 7:141-152 (Pubitemid 29058342)
24. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breastconserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:265-270 (Pubitemid 28249319)
25. Rieber A, Merkle E, Zeitler H, et al. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:780-784 (Pubitemid 28049628)
26. Belli P, Pastore G, Romani M, Terribile D, CanadèA, Costantini M. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy. Rays 2002; 27:241-257
27. Preda L, Villa G, Rizzo S, et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 2006; 8:R53
28. Van Goethem M, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, et al. Role of MRI of the breast in the evaluation of the symptomatic patient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21:74-79
29. Kirova YM, Vilcoq JR, Asselain B, Sastre-Garau X, Fourquet A. Radiation-induced sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a large-scale singleinstitution review. Cancer 2005; 104:856-863 (Pubitemid 41113688)
30. Rao J, Dekoven JG, Beatty JD, Jones G. Cutaneous angiosarcoma as a delayed complication of radiation therapy for carcinoma of the breast. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49:532-538 (Pubitemid 37051925)
31. Wynn GR, Bentley PG, Liebmann R, Fletcher CD. Mammary parenchymal angiosarcoma after breastconserving treatment for invasive high-grade ductal carcinoma. Breast J 2004; 10:558-559 (Pubitemid 39524998)
32. Catena F, Santini D, Di Saverio S, et al. Skin angiosarcoma arising in an irradiated breast: casereport and literature review. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32:447-455
33. Lagrange JL, Ramaioli A, Chateau MC, et al. Sarcoma after radiation therapy: retrospective multiinstitutional study of 80 histologically confirmed cases. Radiology 2000; 216:197-205 (Pubitemid 30434742)