Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 863-873

  Buist, Diana S M ^a   Abraham, Linn A ^a   Barlow, William E ^a,b   Krishnaraj, Arun ^c   Holdridge, Regan C ^d   Sickles, Edward A ^e   Carney, Patricia A ^f   Kerlikowske, Karla ^g   Geller, Berta M ^h  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Department of Hematology Oncology   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms; Carcinoma; Diagnostic imaging; Ductal; Local; Mammary; Mammography; Neoplasm recurrence; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Second primary; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

HORMONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY CANCER; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SECOND CANCER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649322734     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1106-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. M Clarke R Collins S Darby C Davies P Elphinstone E Evans J Godwin R Gray C Hicks S James E MacKinnon P McGale T McHugh R Peto C Taylor Y Wang 2005 Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 366 2087 2106 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnnsVSitA%3D%3D 16360786 (Pubitemid 41797643)
2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687-1717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0 (Pubitemid 40719106)
3. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, Palli D, del Roselli TM, Liberati A (2005) Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25(1):CD001768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001768.pub2
4. JL Khatcheressian AC Wolff TJ Smith E Grunfeld HB Muss VG Vogel F Halberg MR Somerfield NE Davidson 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting J Clin Oncol 24 5091 5097 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8575 17033037 (Pubitemid 46631413)
5. M Schootman DB Jeffe M Lian R Aft WE Gillanders 2008 Surveillance mammography and the risk of death among elderly breast cancer patients Breast Cancer Res Treat 111 489 496 10.1007/s10549-007-9795-1 10.1007/s10549-007-9795-1 17957465
6. TL Lash MP Fox DS Buist F Wei TS Field FJ Frost AM Geiger VP Quinn MU Yood RA Silliman 2007 Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors J Clin Oncol 25 3001 3006 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9572 17548838 (Pubitemid 47218045)
7. E Grunfeld H Noorani L McGahan L Paszat D Coyle C van Walraven J Joyce C Sawka 2002 Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review Breast 11 228 235 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fns1GrtA%3D%3D 10.1054/brst.2001.0404 14965672 (Pubitemid 34830704)
8. R Ballard-Barbash SH Taplin B Yankaskas V Ernster RD Rosenberg P Carney WE Barlow B Geller K Kerlikowske BK Edwards C Lynch N Urban CA Chrvala CR Key S Poplack JK Worden L Kessler 1997 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database Am J Roentgenol 169 1001 1008 1:STN:280:DyaK2svltlygsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27406892)
9. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Homepage. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/. Accessed 5 March 2010
10. PA Carney BM Geller H Moffett M Ganger M Sewell WE Barlow N Stalnaker SH Taplin C Sisk VL Ernster HA Wilkie B Yankaskas SP Poplack N Urban MM West RD Rosenberg S Michael TD Mercurio R Ballard-Barbash 2000 Current medicolegal and confidentiality issues in large, multicenter research programs Am J Epidemiol 152 371 378 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjtFymsA%3D%3D 10.1093/aje/152.4.371 10968382 (Pubitemid 30626730)
11. Greene F, Page D, Fleming I, Fritz A, Balch C, Haller D, Morrow M (eds) (2001) AJCC cancer staging manual. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia
12. American College of Radiology (ed) (1998) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS™). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
13. RD Rosenberg BC Yankaskas WC Hunt R Ballard-Barbash N Urban VL Ernster K Kerlikowske B Geller PA Carney S Taplin 2000 Effect of variations in operational definitions on performance estimates for screening mammography Acad Radiol 7 1058 1068 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3gtFSkug%3D%3D 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80057-4 11131050
14. BC Yankaskas SH Taplin L Ichikawa BM Geller RD Rosenberg PA Carney K Kerlikowske R Ballard-Barbash GR Cutter WE Barlow 2005 Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States Radiology 234 363 373 10.1148/radiol.2342040048 10.1148/radiol.2342040048 15670994 (Pubitemid 40139904)
15. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (2008) Performance measures for 3,603,832 screening mammography examinations from 1996 to 2006 by age and time (months) since previous mammography. National Cancer Institute. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/performance/screening/perf-age-time.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2009
16. EA Sickles DL Miglioretti R Ballard-Barbash BM Geller JW Leung RD Rosenberg R Smith-Bindman BC Yankaskas 2005 Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography Radiology 235 775 790 10.1148/radiol.2353040738 15914475 (Pubitemid 40695870)
17. BM Geller K Kerlikowske PA Carney LA Abraham BC Yankaskas SH Taplin R Ballard-Barbash MB Dignan R Rosenberg N Urban WE Barlow 2003 Mammography surveillance following breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 81 107 115 10.1023/A:1025794629878 14572153 (Pubitemid 37211128)
18. National Cancer Institute BCSC (2007) Abnormal interpretations for 4,032,556 screening mammography examinations from 1996-2005. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/benchmarks/screening/table3.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2008
19. C Isaacs V Stearns DF Hayes 2001 New prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence Semin Oncol 28 53 67 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ntlKksA%3D%3D 10.1016/S0093-7754(01)90045-4 11254867
20. ER Fisher S Anderson E Tan-Chiu B Fisher L Eaton N Wolmark 2001 Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol-06 Cancer 91 1679 1687 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hvFWnsw%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1679::AID- CNCR1183>3.0.CO;2-8 11309768 (Pubitemid 32319246)
21. M Cianfrocca LJ Goldstein 2004 Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer Oncologist 9 606 616 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-606 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-606 15561805 (Pubitemid 39546402)
22. M Colozza E Azambuja F Cardoso C Sotiriou D Larsimont MJ Piccart 2005 Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now? Ann Oncol 16 1723 1739 10.1093/annonc/mdi352 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrlvFGntA%3D%3D 10.1093/annonc/mdi352 15980158 (Pubitemid 41631235)
23. PH Zahl J Maehlen HG Welch 2008 The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography Arch Intern Med 168 2311 2316 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311 19029493
24. D Mille T Roy MO Carrere I Ray N Ferdjaoui HM Spath F Chauvin T Philip 2000 Economic impact of harmonizing medical practices: compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the follow-up of breast cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center J Clin Oncol 18 1718 1724 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islyjtg%3D%3D 10764432
25. H Joensuu T Lehtimaki K Holli L Elomaa T Turpeenniemi-Hujanen V Kataja A Anttila M Lundin J Isola J Lundin 2004 Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods JAMA 292 1064 1073 10.1001/jama.292.9.1064 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnsVOgsL0%3D 10.1001/jama.292.9.1064 15339900 (Pubitemid 39129196)
26. Y Shen Y Yang LY Inoue MF Munsell AB Miller DA Berry 2005 Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials J Natl Cancer Inst 97 1195 1203 10.1093/jnci/dji239 10.1093/jnci/dji239 16106024 (Pubitemid 41258225)
27. N Houssami S Ciatto F Martinelli R Bonardi SW Duffy 2009 Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors Ann Oncol 20 1505 1510 10.1093/annonc/mdp037 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MrnsVaqsw%3D%3D 10.1093/annonc/mdp037 19297316
28. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Fast Stats. National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/. Accessed 25 Feb 2009
29. P Immonen-Raiha L Kauhava I Parvinen K Holli P Kronqvist L Pylkkanen H Helenius A Kaljonen O Rasanen PJ Klemi 2005 Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence Cancer 103 474 482 10.1002/cncr.20793 10.1002/cncr.20793 15611974
30. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer facts & figures 2009. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
31. CD Lehman C Gatsonis CK Kuhl RE Hendrick ED Pisano L Hanna S Peacock SF Smazal DD Maki TB Julian ER DePeri DA Bluemke MD Schnall 2007 MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 1295 1303 10.1056/NEJMoa065447 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFGht70%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa065447 17392300 (Pubitemid 46513295)
32. MR Andersen N Urban 1998 The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer Am J Public Health 88 1713 1714 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FisVKktA%3D%3D 10.2105/AJPH.88.11.1713 9807544
33. NL Keating MB Landrum E Guadagnoli EP Winer JZ Ayanian 2007 Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer J Clin Oncol 25 1074 1081 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6876 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6876 17369571 (Pubitemid 46596759)
34. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
35. AM Geiger SS Thwin TL Lash DS Buist MN Prout F Wei TS Field M Ulcickas Yood FJ Frost SM Enger RA Silliman 2007 Recurrences and second primary breast cancers in older women with initial early-stage disease Cancer 109 966 974 10.1002/cncr.22472 17243096 (Pubitemid 46333538)
36. E Huang TA Buchholz F Meric S Krishnamurthy NQ Mirza FC Ames BW Feig HM Kuerer MI Ross SE Singletary MD McNeese EA Strom KK Hunt 2002 Classifying local disease recurrences after breast conservation therapy based on location and histology: new primary tumors have more favorable outcomes than true local disease recurrences Cancer 95 2059 2067 10.1002/cncr.10952 10.1002/cncr.10952 12412158 (Pubitemid 35253366)
37. E Janschek D Kandioler-Eckersberger C Ludwig S Kappel B Wolf S Taucher M Rudas M Gnant R Jakesz 2001 Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 67 1 8 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXms1Siuro%3D 10.1023/A:1010661514306 11518461 (Pubitemid 32703382)
38. TE Smith D Lee BC Turner D Carter BG Haffty 2000 True recurrence vs. new primary ipsilateral breast tumor relapse: an analysis of clinical and pathologic differences and their implications in natural history, prognoses, and therapeutic management Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 1281 1289 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FnvVSqsA%3D%3D 11121624
39. B Fisher J Costantino C Redmond E Fisher R Margolese N Dimitrov N Wolmark DL Wickerham M Deutsch L Ore, et al. 1993 Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer N Engl J Med 328 1581 1586 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3lsVCqug%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199306033282201 8292119 (Pubitemid 23151917)
40. K Kerlikowske A Molinaro I Cha BM Ljung VL Ernster K Stewart K Chew DH Moore 2nd F Waldman 2003 Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy J Natl Cancer Inst 95 1692 1702 14625260