Is a Short-Interval Postradiation Mammogram Necessary After Conservative Surgery and Radiation in Breast Cancer?

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1041-1047

  Lin, Kevin ^a   Eradat, Jilbert ^b   Mehta, Niraj H ^c   Bent, Chris ^c   Lee, Steve P ^a   Apple, Sophia K ^c   Bassett, Lawrence W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conservation; Mammogram; Radiation; Short interval

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCERS; BREAST CONSERVATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONSERVATION THERAPIES; CONSERVATIVE SURGERIES; DATA SUPPORTS; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; LOS ANGELES; MAMMOGRAM; NONINVASIVE; RECURRENT CANCERS; SHORT-INTERVAL; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;

RADIATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SALVAGE THERAPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 54049083035     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2007. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007PWSecured.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2008.
2. National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat fact sheets, 1995-2001. Available at: seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed February 2, 2008.
3. Mandelblatt J.S., Lawrence W.F., Cullen J., et al. Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 77-84
4. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1233-1241
5. Rapiti E., Fioretta G., Vlastos G., et al. Breast-conserving surgery has equivalent effect as mastectomy on stage I breast cancer prognosis only when followed by radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 69 (2003) 277-284
6. Kurtz J.M., Amalric R., Brandone H., et al. Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis. Cancer 63 (1989) 1912-1917
7. Haffty B.G., Goldberg N.B., Rose M., et al. Conservative surgery with radiation therapy in clinical stage I and II breast cancer. Results of a 20-year experience. Arch Surg 124 (1989) 1266-1270
8. Gage I., Recht A., Gelman R., et al. Long-term outcome following breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33 (1995) 245-251
9. Clarke M., Collins R., Darby S., et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366 (2005) 2087-2106
10. Orel S.G., Troupin R.H., Patterson E.A., et al. Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and irradiation: Role of mammography in detection. Radiology 183 (1992) 201-206
11. Stomper P.C., Recht A., Berenberg A.L., et al. Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148 (1987) 39-43
12. Orel S.G., Fowble B.L., Solin L.J., et al. Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy for early-stage disease: Prognostic significance of detection method. Radiology 188 (1993) 189-194
13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Breast cancer. v.2.2008 Available at: http://www.nccn.com/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2008.
14. Recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 15 (1997) 2149-2156
15. Smith T.J., Davidson N.E., Schapira D.V., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17 (1999) 1080-1082
16. Khatcheressian J.L., Wolff A.C., Smith T.J., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 5091-5097
17. 2007 Medicare reimbursement for diagnostic digital mammography (HCPCS G0206). Available at: http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/community/reimbursement/docs/MammographyOverview.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2008.
18. Kashikar-Zuck S., Keefe F.J., Kornguth P., et al. Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: A preliminary study. Pain 73 (1997) 165-172
19. Aro A.R., Absetz-Ylostalo P., Eerola T., et al. Pain and discomfort during mammography. Eur J Cancer 32A (1996) 1674-1679
20. Maxwell J.R., Bugbee M.E., Wellisch D., et al. Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: Study of psychological outcomes. Breast J 6 (2000) 53-61
21. Bugbee M.E., Wellisch D.K., Arnott I.M., et al. Breast core-needle biopsy: Clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 234 (2005) 73-78
22. Grunfeld E., Noorani H., McGahan L., et al. Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast 11 (2002) 228-235
23. Rosenberg R.D., Yankaskas B.C., Abraham L.A., et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 241 (2006) 55-66
24. Pinsky R.W., Rebner M., Pierce L.J., et al. Recurrent cancer after breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Mammographic features, method of detection, and stage of recurrence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 140-144
25. Grunfeld E., Dhesy-Thind S., and Levine M. Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update). CMAJ 172 (2005) 1319-1320
26. Dershaw D.D. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol 164 (1995) 309-316
27. Dershaw D.D., Shank B., and Reisinger S. Mammographic findings after breast cancer treatment with local excision and definitive irradiation. Radiology 164 (1987) 455-461
28. Libshitz H.I., Montague E.D., and Paulus D.D. Calcifications and the therapeutically irradiated breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 128 (1977) 1021-1025
29. Vora S.A., Wazer D.E., and Homer M.J. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy. Radiology 203 (1997) 667-671
30. Günhan-Bilgen I., and Oktay A. Management of microcalcifications developing at the lumpectomy bed after conservative surgery and radiation therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 393-398
31. Farria D.M., Schmidt M.E., Monsees B.S., et al. Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: A crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey. Cancer 104 (2005) 491-498
32. Kornguth P.J., Keefe F.J., Wright K.R., et al. Mammography pain in women treated conservatively for breast cancer. J Pain 1 (2000) 268-274
33. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. Cancer stat fact sheets-Cancer of the breast 2007. Available at: seer.cancer.gov/statfacts. Accessed February 2, 2008.
34. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57 (2007) 43-66
35. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2007-2008. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/BCFF-Final.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2008.
36. Buchholz T.A., Theriault R.L., Niland J.C., et al. The use of radiation as a component of breast conservation therapy in national comprehensive cancer network center. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 361-369
37. Baxter N.N., Virnig B.A., Durham S.B., et al. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 443-448
38. Ballard-Barbash R., Potosky A.L., Harlan L.C., et al. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst 88 (1996) 716-726
39. Potosky A.L., Merrill R.M., Riley G.F., et al. Breast cancer survival and treatment in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings. J Natl Cancer Inst 89 (1997) 1683-1691
40. Du X., Freeman J.L., and Goodwin J.S. Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: The advantages of the linked medicare and SEER data. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results. J Clin Epidemiol 52 (1999) 463-470
41. Lazovich D., Solomon C.C., Thomas D.B., et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 86 (1999) 628-637
42. White J., Morrow M., Moughan J., et al. Compliance with breast-conservation standards for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 97 (2003) 893-903
43. Mertz K.R., Baddour L.M., Bell J.L., et al. Breast cellulitis following breast conservation therapy: A novel complication of medical progress. Clin Infect Dis 26 (1998) 481-486
44. Sharp P.C., Michielutte R., Freimanis R., et al. Reported pain following mammography screening. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 833-836
45. Dershaw D.D. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: Digital versus film. Breast J 12 (2006) 99-102
46. Berman C.G. Recent advances in breast-specific imaging. Cancer Control 14 (2007) 338-349
47. Riedl C.C., Ponhold L., Flöry D., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13 (2007) 6144-6152
48. Lehman C.D., Isaacs C., Schnall M.D., et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244 (2007) 381-388
49. Gluck B.S., Dershaw D.D., Liberman L., et al. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology 188 (1993) 469-472
50. Teixidor H.S., Chu F.C., Kim Y.S., et al. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer 69 (1992) 1418-1423
51. Aref A., Youssef E., Washington T., et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am 6 (2000) 25-27
52. Schwartz G.F., Solin L.J., Olivotto I.A., et al. The Consensus Conference on the Treatment of in situ Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast, 22-25 April 1999. Breast 9 (2000) 177-186
53. Grann A., Abdou J.C., Dragman N., et al. The value of postexcision preradiation mammography in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 27 (2004) 285-288
54. Schapira M.M., McAuliffe T.L., and Nattinger A.B. Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors. Med Care 38 (2000) 281-289
55. Andersen M.R., and Urban N. The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer. Am J Public Health 88 (1998) 1713-1714