Fibroblast growth on micro- and nanopatterned surfaces prepared by a novel sol-gel phase separation method

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 783-792

  Reemann, Paula ^a   Kangur, Triin ^a   Pook, Martin ^a   Paalo, Madis ^a,b   Nurmis, Liis ^a   Kink, Ilmar ^a,b   Porosaar, Orm ^c   Kingo, Külli ^a,d   Vasar, Eero ^a   Kõks, Sulev ^a,e   Jaks, Viljar ^a,f,g   Järvekülg, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b Estonian Nanotechnology Competence Centre   (Estonia)

^c TALLINN CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Estonia)

^d TARTU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Estonia)

^e ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Estonia)

^f Department of Immunotherapy   (Estonia)

^g KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROWTH CHARACTERISTIC; HUMAN DERMAL FIBROBLASTS; NANO-PATTERNED SURFACES; PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; SEPARATION METHODS; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; STRUCTURE FEATURES; SUPPORTING SURFACES;

CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL MEMBRANES; GROWTH KINETICS; MICROSTRUCTURE; MORPHOLOGY; PHASE SEPARATION; SOLS;

SURFACE STRUCTURE;

NANOPARTICLE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CELL AGING; CELL GROWTH; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CYTOPLASM; FIBROBLAST; FILOPODIUM; GEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN FIBROBLAST; SOLVENT EFFECT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CELLS, CULTURED; FIBROBLASTS; GELS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84876411367     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4829-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Saal K, Tätte T, Järvekülg M, Reedo V, Lohmus A, Kink I. Micro- and nanoscale structures by sol-gel processing. Int J Mater Prod Technol. 2011;40:2-14.
2. Dirè S, Tagliazucca V, Callone E, Quaranta A. Effect of functional groups on condensation and properties of sol-gel silica nanoparticles prepared by direct synthesis from organoalkoxysilanes. Mater Chem Phys. 2011;126:909-17.
3. Kim SH, Turnbull J, Guimond S. Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J Endocrinol. 2011;209:139-51.
4. Wheeldon I, Farhadi A, Bick AG, Jabbari E, Khademhosseini A. Nanoscale tissue engineering: spatial control over cell-materials interactions. Nanotechnology. 2011;22:212001.
5. Choi CK, Breckenridge MT, Chen CS. Engineered materials and the cellular microenvironment: a strengthening interface between cell biology and bioengineering. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:705-14.
6. Yang Y, Leong KW. Nanoscale surfacing for regenerative medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2:478-95.
7. Verma S, Domb AJ, Kumar N. Nanomaterials for regenerative medicine. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2011;6:157-81.
8. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677-89.
9. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;60:24-34.
10. Tirrell M, Kokkoli E, Biesalski M. The role of surface science in bioengineered materials. Surf Sci. 2002;500:61-83.
11. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J. 2009;97:357-68.
12. Poellmann MJ, Harrell PA, King WP, Wagoner Johnson AJ. Geometric microenvironment directs cell morphology on topographically patterned hydrogel substrates. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3514-23.
13. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Nikkhah M, Kolind K, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A. Micro- and nanoengineering approaches to control stem cell-biomaterial interactions. J Funct Biomater. 2011;2:88-106.
14. Smitha S, Shajesh P, Mukundan P, Warrier KGK. Sol-gel synthesis of biocompatible silica-chitosan hybrids and hydrophobic coatings. J Mater Res. 2008;23:2053-60.
15. Lee J-H, Kim H-E, Shin K-H, Koh Y-H. Electrodeposition of biodegradable sol-gel derived silica onto nanoporous TiO2 surface formed on Ti substrate. Mater Lett. 2011;65:1519-21.
16. Kajihara K, Hirano M, Hosono H. Sol-gel synthesis of monolithic silica gels and glasses from phase-separating tetraethoxysilane-water binary system. Chem Commun (Camb). 2009;2580, 2. doi: 10.1039/B900887J.
17. Timusk M, Järvekülg M, Salundi A, Lõhmus R, Kink I, Saal K. Optical properties of high-performance liquid crystal-xerogel microcomposite electro-optical film. J Mater Res. 2012;27:1257-64.
18. Nakanishi K, Tanaka N. Sol-gel with phase separation. Hierarchically porous materials optimized for high-performance liquid chromatography separations. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:863-73.
19. Brown JM, Swindle EJ, Kushnir-Sukhov NM, Holian A, Metcalfe DD. Silica-directed mast cell activation is enhanced by scavenger receptors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36:43-52.
20. Ferry VE, Verschuuren MA, Lare MC, Schropp RE, Atwater HA, Polman A. Optimized spatial correlations for broadband light trapping nanopatterns in high efficiency ultrathin film a-Si:H solar cells. Nano Lett. 2011;11:4239-45.
21. Bhushan B, Jung YC, Koch K. Micro-, nano- and hierarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009;367:1631-72.
22. Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature. 2010;463:485-92.
23. Belyantseva IA, Perrin BJ, Sonnemann KJ, Zhu M, Stepanyan R, McGee J, et al. Gamma-actin is required for cytoskeletal maintenance but not development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9703-8.
24. Dugina V, Zwaenepoel I, Gabbiani G, Clement S, Chaponnier C. Beta and gamma-cytoplasmic actins display distinct distribution and functional diversity. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:2980-8.
25. Tsai IY, Kimura M, Stockton R, Green JA, Puig R, Jacobson B, et al. Fibroblast adhesion to micro- and nano-heterogeneous topography using diblock copolymers and homopolymers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;71:462-9.
26. Hamilton DW, Riehle MO, Monaghan W, Curtis AS. Articular chondrocyte passage number: influence on adhesion, migration, cytoskeletal organisation and phenotype in response to nano- and micro-metric topography. Cell Biol Int. 2005;29:408-21.
27. Debacq-Chainiaux F, Erusalimsky JD, Campisi J, Toussaint O. Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-betagal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1798-806.
28. Stockton RA, Jacobson BS. Modulation of cell-substrate adhesion by arachidonic acid: lipoxygenase regulates cell spreading and ERK1/2-inducible cyclooxygenase regulates cell migration in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:1937-56.
29. Khor HL, Kuan Y, Kukula H, Tamada K, Knoll W, Moeller M, et al. Response of cells on surface-induced nanopatterns: fibroblasts and mesenchymal progenitor cells. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:1530-40.
30. Kill IR. Localisation of the Ki-67 antigen within the nucleolus. Evidence for a fibrillarin-deficient region of the dense fibrillar component. J Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 6):1253-63.
31. Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol. 1984;133:1710-5.
32. Knuchel R, Hofstaedter F, Sutherland RM, Keng PC. Proliferation- associated antigens PCNA and Ki-67 in two- and three-dimensional experimental systems of human squamous epithelial carcinomas. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1990;74:275-8.
33. Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology. 2008;47:1394-400.
34. Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT, Strange DG, Li Y, Oyen ML, et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2012;11:642-9.