Supply chain risk assessment during new product development: A group decision making approach using numeric and linguistic data

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2790-2804

  Chaudhuri, Atanu ^a   Mohanty, Bhaba Krishna ^a   Singh, Kashi Naresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

Author keywords

Linguistic and numeric data failure mode effect analysis; New product development; Supply chain risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING; FAILURE MODE EFFECT ANALYSIS; FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; NUMERIC DATA; PROCESS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT STAGES; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK;

DECISION MAKING; FAILURE MODES; LINGUISTICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84876346130     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.654922     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Atuahene-Gima, K., 2003. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: how does problem solving matter? Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 359-373.
2. Blackhurst, J., et al., 2005. An empirically derived agenda for critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (19), 4067-4081.
3. Bozdogan, K., et al., 1998. Architectural innovation in product development through early supplier integration. R&D Management, 28 (3), 163-173.
4. Chaudhuri, A. and Singh, K.N., 2012. Risk assessment of supply chains during new product development: applications in discrete and process manufacturing industries. In: H. Gurnani, A. Mehrotra and S. Ray, eds. Supply Chain Disruptions: Theory and Practice of Managing Risk. London: Springer-Verlag, 303-317.
5. Clark, K.B., 1989. Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science, 35 (10), 1247-1263.
6. Dowlatshahi, S., 1999. A modeling approach to logistics in concurrent engineering. European Journal of Operational Research, 115 (1), 59-76.
7. Esterman, M. and Ishii, K., 2001. Concurrent product development across the supply chain: development of integrator/supplier risk and coupling indices. Proceedings of DETC 2001, ASME 2001 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, 9-12 September, Pittsburg, PA, ASME, 1-10.
8. Evans, S. and Jukes, S., 2000. Improving co-development through process alignment. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 20 (8), 979-988.
9. Gaudenzi, B., 2008. Assessing risks in projects and processes. In: G.A. Zsidisin and B. Ritchie, eds. Supply chain risk - A handbook of assessment, management and performance. New York: Springer, 67-81.
10. Giunipero, L.C. and Eltantawy, R.A., 2004. Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34 (9), 698-713.
11. Goldratt, E.M., 1997. Critical chain. Great Barrington, MA: The North River Press.
12. Hartley, J.L., Zirger, B.J., and Kamath, R.R., 1997. Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development. Journal of Operations Management, 15 (1), 57-70.
13. Herrera, F. and Martinez, L., 2000. An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in decision making. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 8 (5), 539-562.
14. Hoult, D.P., (1997). Product development with suppliers - the role of database commonality. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Technical Paper Series, #970776, sp-1266, 7.
15. Johansson, E., Bellgran, M., and Johansson, M.I., 2006. Evaluation of materials supply systems during product development projects. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (5), 903-917.
16. Kamath, R. and Liker, J.K., 1994. A second look at Japanese product development. Harvard Business Review, 72 (6), 154-160.
17. Leonard-Barton, D., 1992. The factory as a learning laboratory. Sloan Management Review, 34 (1), 23.
18. Martin, M.V. and Ishii, K., 2000. Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures. ASME design engineering technical conferences, Proceedings of DETC 2000, 10-13 September 2000, Baltimore, MD, ASME, 1-15.
19. Nonaka, I., 1997. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 96.
20. Ragatz, G.L., Handfield, R.B., and Scannell, T.V., 1997. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14 (3), 190-202.
21. Sinha, P.R., Whitman, L.E., and Malzahn, D., 2004. Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Management - an International Journal, 9 (2), 154-168.
22. Tang, C.S., 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (2), 451-488.
23. Thomke, S. and Fujimoto, T., 2000. The effect of 'front-loading' problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17 (2), 128-142.
24. Ward, A., et al., 1995. The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 43-61.
25. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., and Chidambaram, V., 2006. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Computers in Industry, 57 (4), 350-365.
26. Wyatt, C., et al., 1997. Co-development: the COGENT initiative. Automotive manufacturing. London: Mechanical Engineering Publication.
27. Yager, R.R., 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18 (1), 183-190.
28. Yager, R.R., 1999. Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics- Part B: Cybernetics, 29 (2), 141-150.
29. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 (3), 338-353.
30. Zsidisin, G.A., et al., 2004. An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34 (5), 397-413.