Concurrent product development across the supply chain: Development of integrator/supplier risk and coupling indicies

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2001, Pages 313-322

  Esterman, Marcos ^a   Ishii, Kosuke ^b  

^a HP   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent product development; Coupling; Design for manufacturability; Risk assessment; Robust design; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

CONCURRENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY; SUPPLY CHAIN;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CONCURRENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DEGREE OF COUPLING; DESIGN CUSTOMIZATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; RESEARCH AGENDA; SYSTEM LEVELS;

EID: 0035791347     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Barkan, P. and C. M. Hinckley (1993). "The Benefits and Limitations of Structured Design Methodologies." ASME Manufacturing Review 6(3): 211-220.
2. Clark, K. B. (1989). "Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development." Management Science 35(10): 1247-1263.
3. Clausing, D. (1994). Total Quality Development: A Step-By-Step Guide to World-Class Concurrent Engineering. New York, ASME Press.
4. Esterman, M. and K. Ishii (1999). Challenges in Robust Concurrent Product Development Across the Supply Chain. DETC '99: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, NV, ASME.
5. Fine, C. H. (1998). Clockspeed: Winning Industrial Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Reading, MA, Perseus Books.
6. Hartley, J. L., J. R. Meredith, et al. (1997). "Suppliers' contributions to product development: An exploratory study." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(3): 258.
7. Helper, S. R. and M. Sako (1995). "Supplier Relations in Japan and the United States: Are They Converging?" Sloan Management Review (Spring 1995): 77-84.
8. Hinckley, C. M. (1993). A Global Conformance Quality Model: A New Strategic Tool for Minimizing Defects Caused by Variation, Error and Complexity. Mechanical Engineering. Stanford, CA, Stanford University: 260.
9. Liker, J. K., D. K. Sobek, II, et al. (1996). "Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: Evidence for set-based concurrent engineering." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43(2): 165-178.
10. Martin, M. V. and K. Ishii (2000). Design for Variety: A Methodology for Developing Product Platform Architectures. 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, MD, ASME.
11. Nishiguchi, T. (1994). Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
12. Novak, S. and S. D. Eppinger (1998). Sourcing by Design: Product Architecture and the Supply Chain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Sloan School of Management.
13. Sobek, D. K. and A. C. Ward (1996). Principles from Toyota's Set-Based Concurrent Engineering Process. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
14. Ulrich, K. (1995). "The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm." Research Policy 24(3): 419.
15. Ulrich, K. T. and S. D. Eppinger (1995). Product Design and Development. Boston, MA, Irwin McGraw-Hill.
16. Wilson, E. (1993). "Maximizing Designers' Impact on Market Success through Product Definition." Design Management Journal (Fall, 1993).