Evaluating state funding for gifted education programs

Roeper Review

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 173-179

  Baker, Bruce D ^a   McIntire, Jay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876332948     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190309554225     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baker, B. D. 2001a. Living on the edges of school funding policies: The plight of at-risk, limited English proficient and gifted children. Educational Policy, 15(5): 699-723.
2. Baker, B. D. 2001b. Gifted children in the current policy and fiscal context of public education: A national snapshot and state level equity analysis of Texas. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3): 229-250.
3. Baker, B. D. 2001c. Measuring the outcomes of state policies for gifted education: An equity analysis of Texas school districts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1): 4-15.
4. Baker, B. D. 2003. An empirical test of bureaucratic responses to state categorical aid: The case of services for limited English proficient children Manuscript submitted for publication
5. Baker, B. D. in press. State policy influences on the internal allocation of school district resources: Evidence from the common core of data. Journal of Education Finance,
6. Baker, B. D. and Friedman-Nimz, R. C. 2002a. Is a federal mandate the answer? If so, what was the question?. Roeper Review, 25(1): 5-10.
7. Baker, B. D. and Friedman-Nimz, R. C. 2002b. Determinants of the availability of opportunities for gifted children: Evidence from NELS '88. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(1): 52-71.
8. Baker, B. D. and Friedman-Nimz, R.C. in press. State policies and equal opportunity: The example of gifted education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
9. Baker, B. D. and Friedman-Nimz, R. C. in press. Gifted children, vertical equity and state school finance policies. Journal of Education Finance,
10. Baker, B. D. and Markham, P. 2002. State school funding policies and limited English proficient children. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(3): 659-680.
11. Campbell, C. D. and Fischel, W. A. 1996. Preferences for school finance systems: Voters versus judges. National Tax Journal, 49(1): 1057-1073.
12. Curley, J. 1991. Financing programs for education of the gifted and talented in New York state. Journal of Education Finance, 16(3): 332-347.
13. Downes, T. A. and Figlio, D. N. 1997. School finance reforms, tax limits, and student performance: Do reforms level up or dumb down?, Medford, MA: Tufts University. Unpublished Manuscript
14. Seilke, C. C., Dayton, D., Holmes, C. T. and Jefferson, A. L. 2001. Public School Finance Programs of the United States and Canada. National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved October 1, 2002 from www.nces.ed.gov/edfin