State school funding policies and limited english proficient students

Bilingual Research Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 659-680

  Baker, Bruce D ^a   Markham, Paul L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011136096     PISSN: 15235882     EISSN: 15235890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2002.10162583     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alexander, C. D., Gronberg, T. J., Jansen, D. W., Keller, H., Taylor, L. I., & Treisman, P. U. (2000). A study of uncontrollable variations in the costs of Texas public education: A summary report prepared for the 77th Texas Legislature. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin.
2. Duncombe, W. D., & Yinger, J. M. (1999). Performance standards and educational cost indexes: You can’t have one without the other. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. S. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 260-297). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Gold, S. D., Smith, D. M., & Lawton, S. B. (1995). Public school finance programs of the United States and Canada: 1993-94. Albany, NY: American Education Finance Association Center for the Study of the States, The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
4. Guthrie, J. W., & Rothstein, R. (1999). Enabling adequacy to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finance distribution arrangements. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. S. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 209-259). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Guthrie, J. W., & Smith, J. R. (1998). Wyoming education finance issues report: Programs for students with special needs. Management Analysis & Planning Inc. Retrieved September 13, 2002, from www.edconsultants.com/Reports/WYspecialneeds.pdf
6. Hussar, W., & Sonnenberg, W. (1999). Trends in school district finance data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Seattle, WA.
7. Imber, M., & Van Geel, T. (2000). Education law (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department ofEducation. Common Core of Data (CCD), school years 1993-1994 through 1997-1998. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Odden, A. R., & Picus, L. O. (2000). School finance: A policy perspective (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Parrish, T. B. (1994). A cost analysis of alternative instructional models for limited English proficient students in California. Journal ofEducation Finance, 19 (3), 256-278.
10. Parrish, T. B., Matsumoto, C. S., Fowler, W. J. (1995). Disparities in public school district spending 1989-90: A multivariate, student-weighted analysis, adjusted for differences in geographic cost of living and student need. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (Report No. NCES 95-300R)
11. Seilke, C. (2001). Public school finance programs of the United States and Canada: 1998-1999. American Education Finance Association and National Center for Education Statistics, Education Finance Division. Retrieved August 12, 2002, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/edfin/ state_finance/StateFinancing.asp