Influence of a Nanoporous Zirconia Implant Surface of on Cell Viability of Human Osteoblasts

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 190-195

  Aboushelib, Moustafa N ^a   Osman, Essam ^b   Jansen, Ineke ^c   Everts, Vincent ^c   Feilzer, Albert J ^c  

^a University of Florida Health College of Medicine   (Egypt)

^b BEIRUT ARAB UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Cell attachment; Growth; Nanoporous; SEM; Zirconia implant

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; DNA; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENZYMOLOGY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NANOPORE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DNA; HUMANS; NANOPORES; OSTEOBLASTS; POROSITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84876322124     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00920.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Piattelli M, et al: A microscopical evaluation of 24 retrieved failed hollow implants. Biomaterials 1999;20:4858-4859
2. Piattelli A, Piattelli M, Mangano C, et al: A histologic evaluation of eight cases of failed dental implants: is bone overheating the most probable cause Biomaterials 1998;19:683-690
3. Seol YJ, Park YJ, Lee SC, et al: Enhanced osteogenic promotion around dental implants with synthetic binding motif mimicking bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2006;77:599-607
4. Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, et al: Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25:2239-2246
5. Piattelli A, Podda G, Scarano A: Histological evaluation of bone reactions to aluminium oxide dental implants in man: a case report. Biomaterials 1996;17:711-714
6. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, et al: Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: a histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:13-20
7. Bachle M, Butz F, Hubner U, et al: Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:53-59
8. Depprich R, Ommerborn M, Zipprich H, et al: Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces. Head Face Med 2008;4:29-33
9. Hao L, Lawrence J, Chian KS: Osteoblast cell adhesion on a laser modified zirconia based bioceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:719-726
10. Yari Sadi A, Shokrgozar MA, Homaeigohar SS, et al: Biological evaluation of partially stabilized zirconia added HA/HDPE composites with osteoblast and fibroblast cell lines. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:2359-2365
11. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ: Selective infiltration-etching technique for a strong and durable bond of resin cements to zirconia-based materials. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:379-388
12. Everts V, Korper W, Hoeben KA, et al: Osteoclastic bone degradation and the role of different cysteine proteinases and matrix metalloproteinases: differences between calvaria and long bone. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:1399-1408
13. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, et al: Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:515-525
14. Gerber I, Gwynn I: Influence of cell isolation, cell culture density, and cell nutrition on differentiation of rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Eur Cell Mater 2001;2:10-20
15. Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ: Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater 2008;24:633-638
16. Hempel U, Hefti T, Kalbacova M, et al: Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:174-181
17. Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, et al: Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater J 2009;28:461-470
18. Guizzardi S, Galli C, Martini D, et al: Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response. J Periodontol 2004;75:273-282
19. Schuler M, Owen GR, Hamilton DW, et al: Biomimetic modification of titanium dental implant model surfaces using the RGDSP-peptide sequence: a cell morphology study. Biomaterials 2006;27:4003-4015
20. Galli C, Guizzardi S, Passeri G, et al: Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2005;76:364-372
21. Setzer B, Bachle M, Metzger MC, et al: The gene-expression and phenotypic response of hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts to surface-modified titanium and zirconia. Biomaterials 2009;30:979-990
22. Piattelli A, Pontes AE, Degidi M, et al: Histologic studies on osseointegration: soft tissues response to implant surfaces and components. A review. Dent Mater 2011;27:53-60
23. Mendonca DB, Miguez PA, Mendonca G, et al: Titanium surface topography affects collagen biosynthesis of adherent cells. Bone 2011;49:463-472
24. Oates TW, Maller SC, West J, et al: Human gingival fibroblast integrin subunit expression on titanium implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2005;76:1743-1750
25. Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, et al: Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res 2003;82:372-376
26. Boyan BD, Schwartz Z, Hambleton JC: Response of bone and cartilage cells to biomaterials in vivo and in vitro. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:116-122
27. Ko HC, Han JS, Bachle M, et al: Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/alumina ceramics. Dent Mater 2007;23:1349-1355
28. Kohal RJ, Baechle M, Han JS, et al: In vitro reaction of human osteoblasts on alumina-toughened zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1265-1271
29. Le Guehennec L, Lopez-Heredia MA, Enkel B, et al: Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater 2008;4:535-543
30. Noth U, Hendrich C, Merklein F, et al: Standardized testing of bone implant surfaces with an osteoblast cell culture system: II. Titanium surfaces of different degrees of roughness. Biomed Tech 1999;44:6-11
31. Zhao M, An M, Wang Q, et al: Quantitative proteomic analysis of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells in response to bioinert implant material titanium and polyetheretherketone. J Proteomics 2012;75:3560-3573
32. Jager M, Urselmann F, Witte F, et al: Osteoblast differentiation onto different biometals with an endoprosthetic surface topography in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86:61-75