The development of organized visual search

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 191-199

  Woods, Adam J ^a,c   Göksun, Tilbe ^a,c   Chatterjee, Anjan ^a,c   Zelonis, Sarah ^b,c   Mehta, Anika ^a   Smith, Sabrina E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjunction search; Executive function; Normal development; Search organization; Search orientation; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84876316263     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson K., Starck L., Rosin I., Svensson E. The development of simple acoustic reaction time in normal children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1984, 26:490-494. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04476.x.
2. Baird A.A., Kagan J., Gaudette T., Walz K.A., Hershlag N., Boas D.A. Frontal lobe activation during object performance: Data from near-infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage 2002, 16:1120-1126.
3. Berch D.B., Foley E.J., Hill R.J., Ryan P.M. Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1999, 74:286-308.
4. Bernstein L.J., Robertson L.C. Independence between illusory conjunctions of color and motion with shape following bilateral parietal lesions. Psychological Science 1998, 9:167-175.
5. Boot W.R., McCarley J.S., Kramer A.F., Peterson M.S. Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychological Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:854-861.
6. Carrasco M. Visual attention: The past 25years. Vision Research 2011, 51:1484-1525. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012.
7. Carrasco M., Giordano A.M., McElree B. Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches. Vision Research 2006, 46:2028-2040.
8. Chokron S., De Agostini M. Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research 1995, 3:51-58.
9. Coyle T.R., Pillow D.R., Snyder A.C., Kochunov P. Processing speed mediates the development of general intelligence in adolescence. Psychological Science 2011, 22:1265-1269. 10.1177/0956797611418243.
10. Deary I.J., Der G. Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: Longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 2005, 12:187-215.
11. Diamond A., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Comparison of human infants and rhesus monkeys on Piaget's AB task: Evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1989, 74:24-40.
12. Donnelly N., Cave K., Greenway R., Hadwin J.A., Stevenson J., Sonuga-Barke E. Visual search in children and adults: Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:120-136.
13. Donnelly N., Guest R., Fairhurst M., Potter J., Deighton A., Patel M. Developing algorithms to enhance the sensitivity of cancellation tests of visuospatial neglect. Behavioral Research Methods in Instructional Computing 1999, 31:668-673.
14. Druker M., Anderson B. Spatial probability aids stimulus discrimination. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 63:1-10. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00063.
15. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
16. Elliot R. Executive functions and their disorders. British Medical Bulletin 2003, 65:49-59.
17. Emrich S.M., Al-Aidroos N., Pratt J., Ferber S. Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory. PLoS One 2009, 4(11):e8042. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008042.
18. Funahashi S. Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience Research 2001, 39:147-165.
19. Gauthier L., Dehaut F., Joanette Y. The Bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1989, 11:49-54.
20. Gerhardstein P., Rovee-Collier C. The development of visual search in infants and very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2002, 81:194-215. 10.1006/jecp.2001.2649.
21. Gibson B.S., Jiang Y. Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science 1998, 9:176-182.
22. Giedd J.N. Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004, 1021:77-85.
23. Giedd J.N., Blumenthal J., Jeffries N.O., Castellanos F.X., Liu H., Zijdenbos A., Paus T., Evans A.C., Rapoport A. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:861-863.
24. Han S., Kim M. Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working. Psychological Science 2004, 15:623-628.
25. Humphreys G.W., Cinel C., Wolfe J., Olson A., Klempen N. Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Research 2000, 40:1569-1596.
26. Jakobsen L.H., Sorensen J.M., Rask I.K., Jensen B.S., Kondrup J. Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients. Nutrition 2011, 27:561-570.
27. Kuperman V., Van Dyke J.A. Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 65:42-73.
28. Lenroot R.K., Geidd J.N. Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30:718-729.
29. Luria R., Vogel E.K. Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:6199-6207.
30. Mark V.W., Woods A.J. Age effects on cancellation speed and organization. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2003, 51:S388.
31. Mark V.W., Woods A.J., Ball K.K., Roth D.L., Mennemeier M. Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect. Neurology 2004, 63:78-84.
32. Moriguchi Y., Hiraki K. Neural origin of cognitive shifting in young children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2009, 106:6017-6021.
33. Muggleton N.G., Chen C.Y., Tzeng O.J.L., Hung D.L., Juan C.H. Inhibitory control and the frontal eye fields. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:2804-2812.
34. Opfer J.E., Furlong E.E. How numbers bias preschoolers' spatial search. Jounral of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2011, 42:682-695.
35. Opfer J.E., Thompson C.A., Furlong E.E. Early development of spatial-numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science 2010, 13:761-771.
36. Peterson M.S., Beck M.R., Vomela M. Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:123-135.
37. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F., Wang R.F., Irwin D.E., McCarley J.S. Visual search has memory. Psychological Science 2001, 12:287-292.
38. Philip B.R. Reaction-times of children. The American Journal of Psychology 1934, 46:379-396.
39. Robertson L.C. Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:93-102.
40. Robertson L.C., Brooks J.L. Visual search and spatial deficits. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:851-862.
41. Sowell E.R., Thompson P.M., Tessner K.D., Toga A.W. Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. The Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:8819-8829.
42. Thompson L.A., Massaro D.W. Before you see it, you see its parts: Evidence for feature encoding and integration in preschool children and adults. Cognitive Psychology 1989, 21:334-362.
43. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
44. Treisman A., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:459-478.
45. Trick L.M., Enns J.T. Life changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development 1998, 13:369-386.
46. van Galen M.S., Reitsma P. Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 101:99-113.
47. Weintraub S., Mesulam M.M. Visual hemispatial inattention: Stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1988, 51:1481-1488.
48. Wilson B.A., Evans J.J., Emslie H., Alderman N., Burgess P. The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998, 8:213-228.
49. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R., Franzel S.L. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:419-433.
50. Woods A.J., Mark V.W. Severe executive dysfunction is a component of left but not right neglect. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005, 11:45.
51. Woods A.J., Mark V.W. Convergent validity of executive organization measures on cancellation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007, 29:719-723.
52. Woods A.J., Mark V.W., Mennemeier M. Alterations in stimulus response influence cancellation performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004, 10:91.
53. Zebian S. Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2005, 5:165-190.
54. Zhou H., Desimone R. Feature-based attention in the frontal eye fields and area V4 during visual search. Neuron 2011, 70:1205-1217.