Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-102

  Robertson, Lynn C ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; BRAIN; BRAIN CORTEX; COLOR; EXPERIENCE; MOTION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM; STROKE;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COGNITION; HUMANS; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037315865     PISSN: 1471003X     EISSN: 14710048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrn1030     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Livingstone, M. Hubel, D. Segregation of form, color, movement depth: anatomy, physiology and perception. Science 240, 740-749 (1988).
2. Fellaman, D. J. Van Essen, D. C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1-47 (1991).
3. Tootell, R. B. H., Dale, A. M., Sereno, M. I. Malach, R. New images from human visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 19, 481-489 (1998).
4. Newcombe, F. Missile Wounds of the Head (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1969).
5. Berhmann, M. Handbook of Neuropsychology Vol. 4 Disorders of Visual Behavior (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001).
6. Damasio, A. R. The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Comput. 1, 123-132 (1989).
7. Koch, C. Crick, R. in Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain (eds Koch, C. Davis, J. L.) 93-109 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994).
8. Garson, J. W. (Dis)solving the binding problem. Phil. Psychol. 14, 381-392 (2001).
9. Shadlen, M. Movshon, J. Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24, 67-77 (1999).
10. Freidman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C. Treisman, A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 269, 853-855 (1995)
11. Robertson, L. C., Treisman, A., Friedman-Hill, S. Grabowecky, M. The interaction of spatial and object pathways: evidence from Balint's syndrome. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 295-317 (1997).
12. Rich, A. N. Mattingley, J. B. Anomalous perception in synaesthesia: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 43-52 (2001).
13. Baron-Cohen, S., Harrison, J., Goldstein, L. H. Wyke, M. Coloured speech perception: is synaesthesia what happens when modularity breaks down? Perception 22, 419-426 (1993).
14. Treisman, A., Sykes, M. Gelade, G. in Attention Performance VI (ed. Dornic, S.) 333-361 (Earlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1977).
15. Treisman, A. M. Schmidt, H. Illusory conjunctions in perception of objects. Cognit. Psychol. 14, 107-141 (1982).
16. Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. Posner, M. Does attention affect visual feature integration? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perf. 12, 361-369 (1986).
17. Prinzmetal, W., Diedrichson, J. Ivry, R. B. Illusory conjunctions are alive and well. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 538-541 (2001).
18. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R. Maddox, T. A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychol. Rev. 103, 165-192 (1996).
19. Treisman, A. Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97-136 (1980).
20. Vallar, G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 87-97 (1998).
21. Rafal, R. in Patient-Based Approaches to Cognitive Neuroscience (eds Farah, M. J. Feinberg, T. E.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).
22. Cohan, A. Rafal, R. Attention and feature integration: illusory conjunctions in a patient with parietal lobe lesions. Psychol. Sci. 2, 106-110 (1991).
23. Eglin, M., Robertson, L. C. Knight, R. T. Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4, 372-381 (1989).
24. Estermann, M., McGlinchey-Berroth, R. Milberg, W. P. Parallel and serial search in hemispatial neglect: evidence for preserved preattentive but impaired attentive processing. Neuropsychology 14, 599-611 (2000).
25. Bisiach, E. Vallar, G. in Handbook of Neuropsychology Vol. 1 (2nd edn) (eds Boller, F, Grafman, J. Rizzolatti, G.) 195-222 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000).
26. Mesulam, M.-M. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 345, 1325-1346 (1999).
27. Rafal, R. in Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology (eds Feinberg, T. E. Farah, M. J.) 319-335 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997).
28. Bernstein, L. J. Robertson, L. C. Independence between illusory conjunctions of color and motion with shape following bilateral parietal lesions. Psychol. Sci. 9, 167-175 (1998).
29. Humphreys, G. W., Cinel, C., Wolfe, J., Olseon, A. Klampen, N. Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Res. 40, 1569-1596 (2000).
30. Treisman, A. Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence. Neuron 24, 105-110 (1999).
31. Treisman, A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1295-1306 (1998).
32. Humphreys, G. W. A multi-stage account of binding in vision: neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cogn. 8, 381-410 (2001).
33. Humphreys, G. W. Riddoch, M. J. Attention to within- object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Coqn. Neuropsychol. 11, 207-241 (1994).
34. Ward, R., Danziger, S., Owen, B. Rafal, R. Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar. Nature Neurosci. 5, 99-100 (2002).
35. Milner, A. D. Goodale, M. A. The Visual Brain in Action Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1995).
36. Ungerleider, L. G. Mishkin, M. in Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds Ingle, J., Goodale, M. S. Mansfield, R. J. W.) 549-586 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982).
37. Treisman, A. Features and objects: the 14 th Bartlett memorial lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 40, 201-217 (1988).
38. Desimone, R. Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18,193-222 (1995).
39. Duncan, J. Humphreys, G. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96, 433-458 (1989).
40. Nakayama, K. Silverman, G. H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320, 264-265 (1986).
41. Kim, M.-S. Robertson, L. C. Implicit representations of visual space after bilateral parietal damage. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 1080-1087 (2001).
42. Corbetta, M., Shulman, G., Miezin, F. Petersen, S. Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunctions. Science 270, 802-805 (1995).
43. Walsh, V. Cowey, A. Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 202-138 (1998).
44. Walsh, V., Ashbridge, E. Cowoey, A. Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 36, 363-367 (1998).
45. Robertson, L. C. Space, Objects, Minds and Brains (Psychology Press, New York, 2003).
46. Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T, Walsh, V Mesulam, M.-M. Dissociation of conjunctions and difficulty during visual search. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 585.12 (2000).
47. Donner, T. H. et al. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. Neuroimage 15, 16-25 (2002).
48. Wojciulik, E. Kanwisher, N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 23, 747-764 (1999).
49. Shafritz, K. M., Gore, J. C. Marois, R. The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10917-10922 (2002).
50. Posner, M. I. Petersen, S. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 25-42 (1990).
51. Desimone, R. Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev Neurosci. 18,193-222 (1995).
52. Singer, W. Gray, C. M. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555-586 (1995).
53. Fahle, M. Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B254, 199-203 (1993).
54. Usher, M. Donnelly, N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature 394, 179-182 (1998).
55. Robertson, L. C. in Approaches to Cognition: Contrasts and Controversies (eds Knapp, T. J. Robertson, L. C.) 159-188 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986).
56. Gray, C. M., Engel, A. K., Konig, P. Singer, W. Stimulus- dependent neuronal oscillations in cat visual cortex: receptive field properties and feature dependence. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2, 607-619 (1990).
57. Muller, M. M. Gruber, T. Induced y-band responses in the human EEG are related to attentional information processing. Visual Cogn. 8, 579-592 (2001).
58. Engle, A. K., Konig, P., Kreiter, A. K. Singer, W. Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science 252, 1177-1179 (1991).
59. Edelman, G. M. Tononi, G. in Neural Correlates of Consciousness (ed. Metzinger, T.) 139-151 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).
60. Muller, M. M., Gruber, T. Keil, A. Modulation of induced y- band activity in the human EEG by attention and visual information processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 38, 283-300 (2000).
61. Tiitinen, H. et al. Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature 364, 59-60 (1993).
62. Desmedt, J. E. Tomberg, C. Transient phase-locking of 40-Hz electrical oscillations in prefrontal and parietal human cortex reflects the process of conscious somatic perception. Neurosci. Lett. 168, 126-129 (1994).
63. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., Nys, G. Heinke, D. Transient binding by time: neuropsychological evidence from anti-extinction. Coqn. Neuropsychol. 19, 361-380 (2002).
64. Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P, Edelman, G. M. Tononi, G. Increased synchronization of magnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neurosci. 19, 5435-5448 (1999).
65. Cytowic, R. E. The Man who Tasted Shapes (Putnam, New York, 1993).
66. Smilek, D., Dixon, M. J., Cudahy, C. Merikle, P M. Synaesthetic photisms influence visual perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 930-936 (2001).
67. Nunn, J. A. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of synesthesia: activation of V4/V8 by spoken words. Nature Neurosci. 5, 371-375 (2002).
68. Paulesu, E. et al. The physiology of coloured hearing: a PET activation study of colour-word synaesthesia. Brain 118, 661-676 (1995).
69. Aleman, A., Rutten, G. M., Sitskoom, M. M., Dautzerberg, G. Ramsey, N. F. Activation of striate cortex in the absence of visual stimulation: an fMRI study of synesthesia. Neuroreport 12, 2827-2830 (2001).
70. Gray, J. A., Williams, S. C. R., Nunn, J. Baron-Cohen, S. in Synaesthesia: Classic and Contemporary Readings (eds Baron-Cohen, S. Harrison, J. E.) 173-181 (Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1997).
71. Maurer, D. in Synaesthesia: Classic and Contemporary Readings (eds Baron-Cohen, S. Harrison, J. E.) 224-242 (Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1997).
72. Ramachandran, V. S. Hubbard, E. M. Psychophysical investigations into the neural basis of synaesthesia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 979-983 (2001).
73. Palmeri, T. J., Blake, R., Marois, R., Flanery, M. A., Whetsell, W. Jr. The perceptual reality of synesthetic colors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4127-4131 (2002).
74. Mattingley, J. B., Rich, A. N., Yelland, G. Bradshaw, J. L. Unconscious priming eliminates automatic binding of color and alphanumeric form in synaesthesia. Nature 410, 580-582 (2001).
75. Grossenbacher, P. G. Lovelace, C. T. Mechanisms of synesthesia: cognitive and physiological constraints. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 36-41 (2001).
76. Treisman, A. M. The binding problem. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 171-178 (1996).
77. Harvey, M. Psychic paralysis of gaze, optic ataxia, and spatial disorder of attention. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12, 265-281 (1995).
78. Holmes, G. Horax, G. Disturbances of spatial orientation and visual attention with loss of stereoscopic vision. Arch. Neurol. Psych. 1, 385-407 (1919).
79. Hof, P. R., Bouras, C., Constantinidis, J. Morrison, J. H. Balint's syndrome in Alzheimer's disease: specific disruption of the occipito-parietal visual pathway. Brain Res. 493, 368-375 (1989).
80. Farah, M. Visual Agnosia (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990).
81. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T. Valenstein, E. in Clinical Neuropsychology(3rd edn) (eds Heilman, K. M. Valenstein, E.) 461-497 (Oxford Univ. Press, London, UK, 1993).
82. Rizzo, M. Vecera, S. P. Psychoanatomical substrates of Balint's syndrome. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72, 162-178 (2002).
83. Vallar, G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 87-97 (1998).
84. Meredith, M. A. On the neuronal basis of multisensory convergence: a brief overview. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 31-40 (2002).
85. Stein, B. E. Meredith, M. A. Merging of the Senses (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993).
86. Wallace, M. R. Stein, B. E. Cross-modal synthesis in the midbrain depends on input from cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 429-432 (1994).
87. Lewkowicz, D. J. Heterogeneity and heterochrony in the development of intersensory perception. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 41-63 (2002).