Species Interactions in the Dynamics of Even- and Uneven-Aged Boreal Forests

Journal of Sustainable Forestry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 371-403

  Pukkala, Timo ^a   Lähde, Erkki ^b   Laiho, Olavi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

growth model; mixed stands; species composition; species dynamics; species succession

Indexed keywords

DIAMETER INCREMENT; GROWTH MODELS; MIXED STANDS; SPECIES COMPOSITION; SPECIES INTERACTIONS; SPECIES SUCCESSION; UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT; UNEVEN-AGED STANDS;

FOOD TECHNOLOGY; PLANNING;

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH RATE; MODELING; STAND DYNAMICS; STAND STRUCTURE; SUCCESSION; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; THINNING;

FOOD; FORESTRY; PLANNING; TECHNOLOGY;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 84876311190     PISSN: 10549811     EISSN: 1540756X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2013.770766     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agestam, E. 1985. En produktionsmodell för blandbestånd av tall, gran och björk I Sverige [A growth simulator for mixed stands of pine, spruce, and birch in Sweden]. Reports of the Department of Forest Growth and Yield Research, 15: 1-150.
2. Andreassen, K. and Øyen, B.-H. 2011. Comparison of selected Nordic stand growth models for natural disturbance management. Forestry Chronicle, 75(3): 497-504.
3. Andreassen, K. and Tomter, S. M. 2003. Basal area growth models individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 180: 11-24.
4. Baskerville, G. L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2(1): 49-53.
5. Bollandsås, O. M., Buongiorno, J. and Gobakken, T. 2008. Predicting the growth of stands and trees of mixed species and size: A matrix model for Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(2): 167-178.
6. Bravo, F., Hann, D. W. and Maguire, D. A. 2001. Impact of competitor species composition on predicting diameter growth and survival rates of Douglas-fir trees in southwestern Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 2237-2247.
7. Brunner, A., Hahn, K., Biber, P. and Skovsgaard, J. P. 2006. "Conversion of Norway spruce: A case study in Denmark based on silvicultural scenario modeling". In Sustainable forest management, Edited by: Hasenauer, H. 343-372. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
8. Burkhart, H. E. and Tomé, M. 2012. Modeling forest trees and stands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
9. Calama, R., Mutke, S., Tomé, J., Gordo, J., Montero, G. and Tomé, M. 2011. Modelling spatial and temporal variability in a zero-inflated variable: The case of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone production. Ecological Modelling, 222: 606-618.
10. Cao, Q. V. 2000. Prediction of annual diameter growth and survival for individual trees from periodic measurements. Forest Science, 46: 127-131.
11. de-Miguel, S., Guzmán, G. and Pukkala, T. 2013. A comparison of fixed- and mixed-effects modeling in tree growth and yield prediction of an indigenous neotropical species (Centrolobium tomentosum) in a plantation system. Forest Ecology and Management, 291: 249-258.
12. de-Miguel, S., Pukkala, T., Assaf, N. and Bonet, J.-A. 2012. "Even-aged or uneven-aged modeling approach? A case for Pinus brutia". In Annals of Forest Science Vol. 69, 455-465. doi:10.1007/s13595-011-0171-2
13. Garber, S. M., Temesgen, H., Monleon, V. J. and Hann, D. W. 2009. Effects of height imputation strategies on stand volume estimation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39: 681-690.
14. Groom, J. D., Hann, D. W. and Temesgen, H. 2012. Evaluation of mixed-effects models for predicting Douglas-fir mortality. Forest Ecology and Management, 276: 139-145.
15. Gustavsen, H. G. 1998. Volymtillväxten och övre höjdens utveckling i talldominerade bestånd i Finland-En utvärdering av några modelers validitet i nuvarande skogar [Volume growth and dominant height development in pine-dominated stands in Finland-Evaluation of the validity of some models in current forests]. Communications of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, 707: 1-190.
16. Guzmán, G., Morales, M., Pukkala, T. and de-Miguel, S. 2012a. A model for predicting the growth of Eucalyptus globulus seedling stands in Bolivia. Forest Systems, 21(2): 205-209.
17. Guzmán, G., Pukkala, T., Palahí, M. and de-Miguel, S. 2012b. Predicting the growth and yield of Pinus radiata in Bolivia. Annals of Forest Science, 69: 335-343.
18. Hasenauer, H. 2006. "Concepts within tree growth modeling". In Sustainable forest management, Edited by: Hasenauer, H. 3-17. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
19. Hei{eth}arsson, L. and Pukkala, T. 2012. Models for simulating the development of Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) plantations in Hallormssta{eth}ur Iceland. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 25: 13-23.
20. Henttonen, H. 1990. Kuusen rinnankorkeusläpimitan kasvun vaihtelu Etelä-Suomessa [Variation in the diameter growth of Norway spruce in Southern Finland]. University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Mensuration and Management, Research Notes, 25: 1-88.
21. Hynynen, J., Ojansuu, R., Hökkä, H., Siipilehto, J., Salminen, H. and Haapala, P. 2002. Models for predicting stand development in MELA system. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers, 835: 1-116.
22. Kangas, A. 1997. On the prediction bias and variance in long-term growth projections. Forest Ecology and Management, 96: 207-216.
23. Kuuluvainen, T. and Aakala, T. 2011. Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: A review and classification. Silva Fennica, 45(5): 823-841.
24. Laasasenaho, J. 1982. Taper curve and volume equations for pine spruce and birch. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 108: 1-74.
25. Laiho, O., Lähde, E. and Pukkala, T. 2011. Uneven- vs. even-aged management in Finnish boreal forests. Forestry, 84: 547-556. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpr032
26. Liang, J., Buongiorno, J. and Monserud, R. S. 2005. Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands: A matrix model with stand diversity effects. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35: 2369-2382.
27. McCulloch, C. E. and Searle, S. R. 2001. Generalized, linear, and mixed models, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Mielikäinen, K. 1985. Koivusekoituksen vaikutus kuusikon rakenteeseen ja kehitykseen. [Effect of an admixture of birch on the structure and development of Norway spruce stands]. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 133: 1-79.
29. Miina, J. 1993. Residual variation in diameter growth in a stand of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Forest Ecology and Management, 58: 111-128.
30. Miina, J. and Pukkala, T. 2000. Using numerical optimization for specifying individual-tree competition models. Forest Science, 46(2): 277-283.
31. Miina, J. and Saksa, T. 2006. Predicting regeneration establishment in Norway spruce plantations using a multivariate multilevel model. New Forests, 32: 265-283.
32. Miina, J. and Saksa, T. 2012. Metsänuudistamistuloksen ennustaminen kuusen uudistamisaloilla Etelä-Suomessa [Predicting the regeneration result of spruce in South Finland], Unpublished manuscript.
33. Nord-Larsen, T. 2006. Modeling individual-tree growth from data with highly irregular measurement intervals. Forest Science, 52(2): 198-208.
34. Pasanen, K. 1998. Integrating variation in tree growth into forest planning. Silva Fennica, 32(1): 11-25.
35. Pretzsch, H., Block, J., Dieler, J., Dong, P. H., Kohnle, U., Nagel, J and Zingg, A. 2010. "Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and beech". In Annals of Forest Science, 67 (Article No. 712) doi:10.1051/forest/2010037
36. Pukkala, T. and Kellomäki, S. 2012. Anticipatory vs. adaptive optimization of stand management when tree growth and timber prices are stochastic. Forestry, 85: 463-472.
37. Pukkala, T., Lähde, E. and Laiho, O. 2009. Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 207-216.
38. Pukkala, T., Lähde, E. and Laiho, O. 2010. Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands in Finland. Forestry, 83(2): 129-142.
39. Pukkala, T., Lähde, E. and Laiho, O. 2011. Using optimization for fitting individual-tree growth models for uneven-aged stands. European Journal of Forest Research, 130(5): 829-839.
40. Pukkala, T., Lähde, E. and Laiho, O. 2012. "Continuous cover forestry in Finland-Recent research results". In Continuous cover forestry, Edited by: Pukkala, T. and von Gadow, K. 85-128. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
41. Pukkala, T., Miina, J., Kurttila, M. and Kolström, T. 1998. A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stand of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 31-42.
42. Pukkala, T., Vettenranta, J., Kolström, T. and Miina, J. 1994. Productivity of a mixed Scots pine-Norway spruce stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 9: 143-153.
43. Roessiger, J., Griess, V. C. and Knoke, T. 2011. May risk aversion lead to near-natural forestry? A simulation study. Forestry, 84: 527-537. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpr017
44. Rollin, F., Buongiorno, J., Zhou, M. and Peyron, J.-L. 2005. Management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura: From stochastic growth and price models to decision tables. Forest Science, 51(1): 64-75.
45. Schütz, J.-P., Pukkala, T., Donoso, P. J. and von Gadow, K. 2012. "Historical emergence and current application of CCF". In Continuous cover forestry, Edited by: Pukkala, T. and von Gadow, K. 1-28. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
46. Shater, Z., de-Miguel, S., Kraid, B., Pukkala, T. and Palahí, M. 2011. A growth and yield model for even-aged Pinus brutia Ten. stands in Syria. Annals of Forest Science, 68(1): 149-157.
47. Solberg, B. and Tveite, B. 2000. Crown density and growth relationships between stands of Picea abies in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15(1): 87-96.
48. Temesgen, H., Monleon, V. J. and Hann, D. W. 2008. Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38: 553-565.
49. Trasobares, A., Pukkala, T. and Miina, J. 2004. Growth and yield model for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. in Catalonia, north-east Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 6: 9-24.
50. Valsta, L. 1992. A scenario approach to stochastic anticipatory optimization in stand management. Forest Science, 3(8): 430-447.
51. Vanclay, J. K. 1994. Modelling forest growth and yield: Applications to mixed tropical forests, Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International.
52. von Gadow, K. and Hui, G. 1999. Modeling forest development, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.